CMF: A Hydrological Programming Language Extension For Integrated Catchment Models

Environmental Modelling and Software

Volumn 26, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 828-830

  Kraft, Philipp ^a   Vaché, Kellie B ^a,b   Frede, Hans Georg ^a   Breuer, Lutz ^a  

^a JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Catchment models; Hydrological model; Model coupling; Object orientated programming; Solute transport

Indexed keywords

CATCHMENT MODELLING; CATCHMENT MODELS; FLOW PROCESS; HYDROLOGICAL MODEL; HYDROLOGICAL MODELS; INTEGRATED CATCHMENT MODEL; MODEL COUPLING; OBJECT ORIENTATED PROGRAMMING; PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE; PYTHON PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE; SPECIFIC LANGUAGES; STRAIGHT-FORWARD METHOD; STUDY AREAS;

C (PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE); CATCHMENTS; CLIMATE MODELS; SOLUTE TRANSPORT;

RUNOFF;

CATCHMENT; FLOW PATTERN; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; SOLUTE TRANSPORT;

EID: 79951722871     PISSN: 13648152     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.12.009     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Beazley, D.M., Lomdahl P.S., 1996. Lightweight computational steering of very large scale molecular dynamics simulations. 96, 50-61. In: Proceedings of the 1996 ACM/IEEE conference on Supercomputing.
2. Buytaert W., Reusser D., Krause S., Renaud J.P. Why can't we do better than Topmodel?. Hydrological Processes 2008, 22:4175-4179.
3. Clark M.P., Slater A.G., Rupp D.E., Woods R.A., Vrugt J.A., Gupta H.V., Wagener T., Hay L.E. Framework for understanding structural errors (FUSE): a modular framework to diagnose differences between hydrological models. Water Resources Research 2008, W00B02. 10.1029/2007WR006735.
4. Fenicia F., Savenije H.H.G., Matgen P., Pfister L. Is the groundwater reservoir linear? Learning from data in hydrological modelling. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 2006, 10:139-151.
5. Hindmarsh A.C., Brown P.N., Grant K.E., Lee S.L., Serban R., Shumaker D.E., Woodward C.S. SUNDIALS: suite of nonlinear and differential/algebraic equation solvers. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software 2005, 31:363-396.
6. Karssenberg D., de Jong K., van der Kwast J. Modelling landscape dynamics with Python. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2007, 21:483-495.
7. Kraft P., Multsch S., Vaché K.B., Frede H.-G., Breuer L. Using Python as a coupling platform for integrated catchment models. Advances in Geosciences 2010, 27:51-56.
8. Ousterhout J.K. Scripting: higher-level programming for the 21st century. IEEE Computer 1998, 31:23-30.
9. Qu Y.Z., Duffy C.J. A semidiscrete finite volume formulation for multiprocess watershed simulation. Water Resources Research 2007, 43:W08419. 10.1029/2006WR005752.
10. Refsgaard J.C., Storm B. MIKE SHE. Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology 1995, 809-846. Water Resources Publications, Highlands Ranch, Colorado. V.P. Singh (Ed.).
11. Vache K.B., McDonnell J.J. A process-based rejectionist framework for evaluating catchment runoff model structure. Water Resources Research 2006, W02409. 10.1029/2005WR004247.