An energetic Ecodesign at conceptual design phase

International Journal of Industrial Engineering : Theory Applications and Practice

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 190-199

  Boonkanit, Prin ^a   Aphikajornsin, Akajate ^a  

^a RAJAMANGALA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY PHRA NAKHON   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Analytic Network Process; Concurrent Engineering; Distance to target; Patent mapping; Quality function deployment; Theory of inventive problem solving

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL DESIGN; CONCURRENT ENGINEERING; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; DECISION THEORY; ECODESIGN; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT;

ANALYTIC NETWORK PROCESS; CONCEPTUAL DESIGN PHASE; DECISION MAKING PROCESS; DISTANCE TO TARGETS; NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT PROCESS; PATENT MAPPINGS; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT TEAMS; THEORY OF INVENTIVE PROBLEM SOLVING;

PRODUCT DESIGN;

EID: 79951688137     PISSN: 10724761     EISSN: 1943670X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Altshuller, G. (2005). 40 principles Extended Edition: TRIZ keys to technical innovation, Technical Innovation Center, Inc. USA.
2. Aoe, T. (2003a). Development of a Factor X (Eco-efficiency) Tool - Study of How to Calculate "Product Function. " Proceedings of Ecodesign 2003, Third international Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing, Tokyo, Japan, December 8-11, pp. 644-649.
3. Aoe, T. (2003b). Introduction and Development of a Factor X (Eco-Efficiency) Tool. IEEE on Electronics and Environment & the IAER Electronics recycling Summit, Electronics Going Green. 2003, pp. 371-376.
4. Baumann, H., Boons, F. and Bragd, A. (2002), Mapping the green product development field: engineering, policy and busi (Pubitemid 34614094)
5. Boks, C. (2006). The Soft Side of Ecodesign. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14:1346-1356. (Pubitemid 43975775)
6. th Annual International Conference on Industrial Engineering-Theory, Applications and Practice, Clearwater, Florida, USA, pp. 163-168.
7. Boonkanit, P. and Apikajornsin, A. (2005b). The methodology for selected product at conceptual design, Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing, International Symposium on Ecodesign 2005, Tokyo, Japan, pp. 242-243. (Pubitemid 46402627)
8. Brezet, H. and Hemel, V. (1997). Ecodesign - a promising approach to sustainable production and consumption. Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands.
9. Charter, M. and Tischner, U. (2001). Sustainable Solutions - Developing Products and Services for the Future. Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield, UK.
10. Dou, H. J. M. (2004). Benchmarking R&D and companies through patent analysis using free databases and special software: a tool to improve innovative thinking. World Patent Information, 26:297-309.
11. Heo, Y. (2001). Methodology for Prioritizing DfE Strategies based on LCA and AHP. MS Thesis. Department of Environmental Engineering Graduate School of Ajou University, Korea.
12. Hsiao, S. W., 2002. Concurrent Design Method for Developing a New Product. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 29:41-55.
13. ISO 14021(1999). Environmental labels and declarations - Self-declared environmental claims (type II environmental labeling), International Standard Organization.
14. ISO/TR 14062(2002). Environmental Management-Integrating Environmental Aspects into Product Design and Development. International Standard Organization.
15. James, R. (1987). Improving Product Development with Value Analysis/Value Engineering: A Total Management Tool. Save Conference Proceedings, pp. 51-66.
16. Kengpol, A. and O'Brien, C. (2000). An analytic network process for evaluation of investment in time compression Technology. Proceeding of The Eleventh Annual Meeting of the production and Operations Management Society (POMS-2000), April, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
17. Karlsson, R. and Luttropp, C. (2006). Ecodesign: What's Happening? An Overview of the Subject Area of Ecodesign and of the Papers. Special Issue. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14:1291-1298. (Pubitemid 43975770)
18. Kengpol, A. and O'Brien, C. (2001). The development of a decision support tool for the selection of advance technology to achieve rapid product development. International Journal of Production Economics, 69:177-191. (Pubitemid 32035377)
19. Kengpol, A. (2004). Quality function deployment (QFD) in Small to medium-sized enterprises: a study of obstacles in implementing QFD in Thailand. International Journal of Management, 21(3):393-402.
20. Kengpol, A. (2006). A framework for group decision support systems: An application in the evaluation of information technology for logistics firms. International Journal of Production Economics, 101:159-171. (Pubitemid 43003700)
21. Kobayashi, H. (2006). A systematic approach to eco-innovative product design based on life cycle planning. Advance Engineering Informatics, 20:113-125.
22. Kusar, J., Duhovnik, J., Grum, J. and Starbek, M. (2004). How to Reduce New Product Development Time. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 20, pp. 1-15.
23. Lindahl, M. (2006). Engineering designers' experience of design for environment methods and tools - Requirements definitions from an interview study. Journal of Cleaner Production, (14) 4:87-496.
24. Pandey, P. C. and Kengpol, A. (1995). Sections of an automated inspection system using multi attribute decision analysis, International Journal of Production Economics, 39:289-298.
25. Quella, F. and Schmidt, W. P. (2003). Integrating Environmental Aspects into Product Design and Development The new ISO TR 14062 - Part 2: Contents and Practical Solutions. Life Cycle Management - Design for Environment, March 17th, pp. 1-7.
26. Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decision Making with Dependence and Feed Back: The Analytics Network Process. RWS Publications. USA.
27. Sakao, T., Masui, K., Kobayashi, M., Aizawa, S. and Inaba, A. (2001). Quality Function Deployment for Environment: QFDE (2ndReport) Verifying the Applicability by Two Case Studies. IEEE. 2001, pp. 858-863.
28. Sakao, T., Kaneko K., Masui, K. and Tsubaki, H. (2004). Analysis of the Characteristics of QFDE and LCA for Ecodesign support. Electronics Goes Green 2004+. Proceedings of joint international congress and exhibition, Berlin, pp. 495-500.
29. Seppala, J. and Hamalainen, R. P. (2001). On Meaning of the Distance-to-Target Weighting Method and Normalization in Life Cycle Impact Assessment. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 6(4):211-218. (Pubitemid 32756335)
30. SETAC (1999). Streamlined Life-Cycle Assessment: A Final Report from the SETAC North America Streamlined LCA Workgroup. SETAC.
31. Sherwin, C. and Evans, S., (2000). Ecodesign Innovation: Is 'Early' Always 'Best'?. International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing, 112-117. (Pubitemid 32394036)
32. Steven, G. A. and Burley, J. (1997). 3000 Raw ideas = 1 commercial success. Research Technology Management 40(3), pp. 16-27. (Pubitemid 127630921)
33. Tong, L. H., Cong, H. and Lixiang, S. (2006). Automatic classification of patent documents for TRIZ users. World Patent Information 28:6-13.