A simple multi-directional absorbing layer method to simulate elastic wave propagation in unbounded domains

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering

Volumn 85, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 1543-1563

  Semblat, Jean François ^a   Lenti, Luca ^a   Gandomzadeh, Ali ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS EST   (France)

Author keywords

Absorbing boundaries; Damping; Finite element method; Spurious reflections; Unbounded domains; Wave propagation

Indexed keywords

2-D MODEL; ABSORBING BOUNDARIES; ABSORBING BOUNDARY CONDITION; ABSORBING LAYERS; ARTIFICIAL BOUNDARIES; FINITE ELEMENT SIMULATIONS; FINITE ELEMENT SOFTWARE; INFINITE ELEMENT; LAYERED SOLIDS; MULTI-DIRECTIONAL; P-WAVES; PERFECTLY MATCHED LAYER; SPURIOUS REFLECTIONS; SPURIOUS WAVES; UNBOUNDED DOMAIN; UNBOUNDED MEDIA;

DAMPING; ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVE REFLECTION; SEISMIC WAVES; SOIL STRUCTURE INTERACTIONS; WAVE PROPAGATION;

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD;

EID: 79951685675     PISSN: 00295981     EISSN: 10970207     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nme.3035     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Virieux J. P-SV wave propagation in heterogeneous media: velocity-stress finite-difference method. Geophysics 1986; 51:889-901.
2. Moczo P, Kristek J, Vavrycuk V, Archuleta RJ, Halada L. 3D heterogeneous staggered-grid finite-difference modeling of seismic motion with volume harmonic and arithmetic averaging of elastic moduli and densities. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2002; 92(8):3042-3066.
3. Hughes TJR. Linear Static and Dynamic Finite Element Analysis. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1987.
4. Semblat JF, Pecker A. Waves and Vibrations in Soils: Earthquakes, Traffic, Shocks, Construction Works. IUSS Press: Pavia, Italy, 2009.
5. Beskos DE. Boundary elements methods in dynamic analysis: Part II (1986-1996). Applied Mechanics Reviews (ASME) 1997; 50(3):149-197.
6. Bonnet M. Boundary Integral Equation Methods for Solids and Fluids. Wiley: Chichester, U.K., 1999.
7. Faccioli E, Maggio F, Paolucci R, Quarteroni A. 2D and 3D elastic wave propagation by a pseudo-spectral domain decomposition method. Journal of Seismology 1997; 1:237-251.
8. Komatitsch D, Vilotte JP, Vai R, Castillo-Covarrubias JM, Sanchez-Sesma FJ. The spectral element method for elastic wave equations-Application to 2D and 3D seismic problems. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1999; 45:1139-1164.
9. Li S, Liu WK. Meshfree Particle Methods. Springer: Berlin, 2007.
10. Ihlenburg F, Babuška I. Dispersion analysis and error estimation of Galerkin finite element methods for the Helmholtz equation. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1995; 38:3745-3774.
11. Semblat JF, Brioist JJ. Efficiency of higher order finite elements for the analysis of seismic wave propagation. Journal of Sound and Vibration 2000; 231(2):460-467.
12. Hughes TJR, Reali A, Sangalli G. Duality and unified analysis of discrete approximations in structural dynamics and wave propagation: comparison of p-method finite elements with k-method NURBS. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2008; 197(49-50):4104-4124.
13. Modaressi H, Benzenati I. An absorbing boundary element for dynamic analysis of two-phase media. 10th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Madrid, 1992; 1157-1163.
14. Gaul L, Schanz M. A comparative study of three boundary element approaches to calculate the transient response of viscoelastic solids with unbounded domains. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1999; 179(1-2):111-123.
15. Semblat JF, Duval AM, Dangla P. Numerical analysis of seismic wave amplification in Nice (France) and comparisons with experiments. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2000; 19(5):347-362.
16. Fujiwara H. The fast multipole method for the integral equations of seismic scattering problems. Geophysical Journal International 1998; 133:773-782.
17. Chaillat S, Bonnet M, Semblat JF. A new fast multi-domain BEM to model seismic wave propagation and amplification in 3D geological structures. Geophysical Journal International 2009; 177:509-531.
18. Dangla P. A plane strain soil-structure interaction model. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1988; 16:1115-1128.
19. Bielak J, Loukakis K, Hisada Y, Yoshimura C. Domain reduction method for three-dimensional earthquake modeling in localized regions, part I: theory. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2003; 93(2):817-824.
20. Givoli D. Non-reflecting boundary conditions. Journal of Computational Physics 1991; 94:1-29.
21. Harari I, Schohet Z. On non-reflecting boundary conditions in unbounded elastic solids. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1998; 163(1-4):123-139.
22. Festa G, Vilotte JP. The Newmark scheme as velocity-stress time-staggering: an efficient PML implementation for spectral element simulations of elastodynamics. Geophysical Journal International 2005; 161:789-812.
23. Engquist B, Majda A. Radiation boundary conditions for acoustic and elastic wave. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics 1979; 32(3):313-357.
24. Bayliss A, Turkel E. Radiation boundary conditions for wave-like equations. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics 1980; 33(6):707-725.
25. Chadwick E, Bettess P, Laghrouche O. Diffraction of short waves modelled using new mapped wave envelope finite and infinite elements. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1999; 45:335-354.
26. Basu U, Chopra AK. Perfectly matched layers for time-harmonic elastodynamics of unbounded domains: theory and finite-element implementation. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2003; 192:1337-1375.
27. Festa G, Nielsen S. PML absorbing boundaries. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2003; 93(2):891-903.
28. Festa G, Vilotte JP, Delavaud E. Interaction between surface waves and absorbing boundaries for wave propagation in geological basins: 2D numerical simulations. Geophysical Research Letters 2005; 32(20):L20306.1-L20306.4.
29. Komatitsch D, Martin R. An unsplit convolutional Perfectly Matched Layer improved at grazing incidence for the seismic wave equation. Geophysics 2007; 72(5):155-167.
30. Meza-Fajardo KC, Papageorgiou AS. A nonconvolutional, split-field, perfectly matched layer for wave propagation in isotropic and anisotropic elastic media: stability analysis. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2008; 98(4):1811-1836.
31. Bérenger J-P. A perfectly matched layer for the absorption of electromagnetics waves. Journal of Computational Physics 1994; 114:185-200.
32. Chew WC, Liu QH. Perfectly matched layers for elastodynamics: a new absorbing boundary condition. Journal of Computational Acoustics 1996; 4(4):341-359.
33. Collino F, Tsogka C. Application of the PML absorbing layer model to the linear elastodynamic problem in anisotropic heterogeneous media. Geophysics 2001; 66(1):294-307.
34. Marcinkovich C, Olsen KB. On the implementation of perfectly matched layers in a three-dimensional fourth-order velocity-stress finite difference scheme. Journal of Geophysical Research 2003; 108(B5):2276.
35. Carcione JM, Cavallini F, Mainardi F, Hanyga A. Time-domain modeling of constant-Q seismic waves using fractional derivatives. Pure and Applied Geophysics 2002; 159(7-8):1719-1736.
36. Day SM, Minster JB. Numerical simulation of wavefields using a Padé approximant method. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society 1984; 78:105-118.
37. Delépine N, Bonnet G, Lenti L, Semblat JF. Nonlinear viscoelastic wave propagation: an extension of Nearly Constant Q models. Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE) 2009; 135(11):1305-1314.
38. Emmerich H, Korn M. Incorporation of attenuation into time-domain computations of seismic wave fields. Geophysics 1987; 52(9):1252-1264.
39. Kausel E, Assimaki D. Seismic simulation of inelastic soils via frequency-dependent moduli and damping. Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE) 2002; 128(1):34-47.
40. Kjartansson E. Constant Q wave propagation and attenuation. Journal of Geophysical Research 1979; 84:4737-4748.
41. Moczo P, Kristek J. On the rheological models used for time-domain methods of seismic wave propagation. Geophysical Research Letters 2005; 32:L01306.
42. Caughey T. Classical normal modes in damped linear systems. Journal of Applied Mechanics 1960; 27:269-271.
43. m proportional damping in explicit integration of dynamic structural systems. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1998; 41:1277-1296.
44. Chopra AK. Dynamics of Structures, Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering (3rd edn). Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 2007.
45. Semblat JF. Rheological interpretation of Rayleigh damping. Journal of Sound and Vibration 1997; 206(5):741-744.
46. Bourbié T, Coussy O, Zinzsner B. Acoustics of Porous Media. Technip: Paris, France, 1987.
47. Idriss IM, Seed HB, Serff N. Seismic response by variable damping finite elements. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division (ASCE) 1974; 100(1):1-13.
48. Semblat JF, Brioist JJ. Wave propagation in non-homogenesouly damped medium: numerical vs experimental approach. 11th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paris, France, 1998.
49. Mavroeidis GP, Papageorgiou AS. A mathematical representation of nearfault ground motions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2003; 93(3):1099-1131.