Offering patients choices: A pilot study of interactions in the seizure clinic

Epilepsy and Behavior

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 312-320

  Toerien, Merran ^a   Shaw, Rebecca ^b   Duncan, Roderick ^c   Reuber, Markus ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^c SOUTHERN GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Conversation analysis; Decision making; Epilepsy; Nonepileptic seizures; Patient choice; Patient participation

Indexed keywords

ANTICONVULSIVE AGENT;

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONSULTATION; CONVERSATION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HOSPITAL; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LINGUISTICS; MALE; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; PHYSICIAN; PILOT STUDY; PSYCHOTHERAPY; SEIZURE; UNITED KINGDOM;

CHOICE BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PILOT PROJECTS; SEIZURES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 79951674305     PISSN: 15255050     EISSN: 15255069     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2010.11.004     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Guadagnoli E., Ward P. Patient participation in decision-making. Soc Sci Med 1998, 47:329-339.
2. Crawford M., Rutter D., Manley C., Weaver T., Bhui K., Fulop N., et al. Systematic review of involving patients in the planning and development of health care. Br Med J 2002, 325:1263-1266.
3. Lewin S., Skea Z., Entwistle V., Zwarenstein M., Dick J. Interventions for providers to promote a patient-centred approach in clinical consultations. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001, 4.
4. Choice Matters: 2007-8 Putting patients in control 2007, Department of Health, London.
5. The expert patient: a new approach to chronic disease management for the 21st century 2000, Department of Health, London.
6. The national service framework for long-term conditions 2005, Department of Health, London.
7. Pugh M.J.V., Berlowitz D.R., Montouris G., et al. What constitutes high quality of care for adults with epilepsy?. Neurology 2007, 69:2020-2027.
8. Brown I., Sheeran P., Reuber M. Enhancing antiepileptic drug adherence: a randomized controlled trial. Epilepsy Behav 2009, 16:634-639.
9. Howlett S., Grünewald R.A., Khan A., Reuber M. Engagement in psychological treatment for functional neurological symptoms: barriers and solutions. Psychol Theory Res Pract Training 2007, 44:354-360.
10. Braddock C.H., Edwards K.A., Hasenberg N.M., Laidley T.L., Levinson W. Informed decision-making in outpatient practice: time to get back to basics. JAMA 1999, 282:2313-2320.
11. Ford S., Schofield T., Hope T. Observing decision-making in the general practice consultation: who makes which decisions?. Health Expect 2006, 9:130-137.
12. Campion P., Foulkes J., Neighbour R., Tate P. Patient centredness in the MRCGP video examination: analysis of large cohort. Br Med J 2002, 325:691-692.
13. Elwyn G., Gwyn R., Edwards A., Grol R. Is 'shared decision-making' feasible in consultations for upper respiratory tract infections? Assessing the influence of antibiotic expectations using discourse analysis. Health Expect 1999, 2:105-117.
14. Karnieli-Miller O., Eisikovits Z. Physician as partner or salesman? Shared decision-making in real-time encounters. Soc Sci Med 2009, 69:1-8.
15. Stevenson F.A., Barry C.A., Britten N., Barber N., Bradley C.P. Doctor-patient communication about drugs: the evidence for shared decision making. Soc Sci Med 2000, 50:829-840.
16. Cohen H., Britten N. Who decides about prostate cancer treatment? A qualitative study. Fam Pract 2003, 20:724-729.
17. McCorry D., Marson T., Jacoby A. Understanding routine antiepileptic drug decisions: a qualitative analysis of patients' accounts of hospital consultations. Epilepsy Behav 2009, 14:210-214.
18. Drew P., Chatwin J., Collins S. Conversation analysis: a method for research into interactions between patients and health-care professionals. Health Expect 2001, 4:58-70.
19. Drew P., Heritage J. Talk at work: interaction in institutional settings 1992, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
20. Britten N. Patients' expectations of consultations. Br Med J 2004, 328:416-417.
21. Heritage J., Maynard D.W. Communication in medical care: Interaction between primary care physicians and patients 2006, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
22. Heritage J., Robinson J.D., Elliott M.N., Beckett M., Wilkes M. Reducing patients' unmet concerns in primary care: the difference one word can make. J Gen Intern Med 2007, 22:1429-1433.
23. Reuber M., Monzoni C., Sharrack B., Plug L. Using conversation analysis to distinguish between epileptic and psychogenic non-epileptic seizures: a prospective blinded multi-rater study. Epilepsy Behav 2009, 16:139-144.
24. Plug L., Sharrack B., Reuber M. Seizure metaphors differ in patients' accounts of epileptic and non-epileptic seizures. Epilepsia 2009, 50:994-1000.
25. Kitzinger C., Toerien M. The turn of talk. No interpretation please! In-depth paper, AQR; Summer 2009 Available at:. http://www.aqr.org.uk/indepth/summer2009/.
26. Waitzkin H. Information giving in medical care. J Health Soc Behav 1985, 26:81-101.
27. Structures of social action: studies in conversation analysis 1984, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge. J.M. Atkinson, J. Heritage (Eds.).
28. Stivers T. Prescribing under pressure: parent-physician conversations and antibiotics 2007, Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
29. Shared decision-making in health care: achieving evidence-based patient choice 2009, 17-22. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford. A. Edwards, G. Elwyn (Eds.).
30. Kanaan R., Armstrong D., Wessely S. Limits to truth-telling: neurologists' communication in conversion disorder. Patient Educ Couns 2009, 77:296-301.
31. Stivers T. Parent resistance to physicians' treatment recommendations: one resource for initiating a negotiation of the treatment decision. Health Commun 2005, 18:41-74.
32. Drew P., Toerien M., Irvine A., Sainsbury R. A study of language and communication between advisers and claimants in work focused interviews. Department for Work and Pensions Research Report 633 2010, HMSO, Norwich.
33. Makoul G. Arntson Paul, Schofield T. Health promotion in primary care: physician-patient communication and decision making about prescription medications. Soc Sci Med 1995, 41:1241-1254.
34. England S.L., Evans J. Patients' choices and perceptions after an invitation to participate in treatment decisions. Soc Sci Med 1992, 34:1217-1225.
35. Antaki C., Finlay W.M.L., Walton C. Choices for people with intellectual disabilities: official discourse and everyday practice. J Pol Prac Intell Disabil 2009, 6:260-266.
36. Hall-Patch L., Brown R., House A., et al. Acceptability and effectiveness of a strategy for the communication of the diagnosis of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures. Epilepsia 2010, 51:70-78.
37. Carton S., Thompson P.J., Duncan J.S. Non-epileptic seizures: patients' understanding and reaction to the diagnosis and impact on outcome. Seizure 2003, 12:287-294.
38. Buchanan N., Snars J. Pseudoseizures (non epileptic attack disorder): clinical management and outcome in 50 patients. Seizure 1993, 2:141-146.
39. Ettinger A.B., Devinsky O., Weisbrot D.M., Ramakrishna R.K., Goyal A. A comprehensive profile of clinical, psychiatric, and psychosocial characteristics of patients with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures. Epilepsia 1999, 40:1292-1298.
40. Farias S.T., Thieman C. Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: acute change in event frequency after presentation of the diagnosis. Epilepsy Behav 2003, 4:424-429.
41. McKenzie P., Oto M., Russell A., Pelosi A., Duncan R. Early outcomes and predictors in 260 patients with psychogenic nonepileptic attacks (PNEA). Neurology 2010, 74:64-69.