Comparison of stability of 2.0 mm standard and 2.0 mm locking miniplate/screws for the fixation of sagittal split ramus osteotomy on sheep mandibles

British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Volumn 49, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 135-137

  Oguz, Yener ^a   Saglam, Haci ^b   Dolanmaz, Dogan ^b   Uckan, Sina ^a  

^a BASKENT UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b SELCUK UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Locking screw plates; Sagittal split ramus osteotomy; Titanium miniplates

Indexed keywords

TITANIUM;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; BONE SCREW; CONTROLLED STUDY; FIXATION DEVICE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MANDIBLE OSTEOTOMY; MANDIBLE RESECTION; MANDIBULAR NERVE; NONHUMAN; PLATE FIXATION; RANK SUM TEST;

ANIMALS; BITE FORCE; BONE PLATES; BONE SCREWS; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; JAW FIXATION TECHNIQUES; MANDIBLE; ORTHOGNATHIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; OSTEOTOMY; RANDOM ALLOCATION; RECURRENCE; SHEEP, DOMESTIC; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TITANIUM;

EID: 79951674037     PISSN: 02664356     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2009.11.014     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. R. Trauner, and H. Obwegeser The surgical correction of mandibular prognathism and retrognathia with consideration of genioplasty. I. Surgical procedures to correct mandibular prognathism and reshaping of the chin Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 10 1957 677 689
2. R. Trauner, and H. Obwegeser The surgical correction of mandibular prognathism and retrognathia with consideration of genioplasty. II. Operating methods for microgenia and distoclusion Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 10 1957 787 792
3. B. Alpert, R. Gutwald, and R. Schmelzeisen New innovations in craniomaxillofacial fixation: the 2.0 lock system Keio J Med 52 2003 120 127 (Pubitemid 36834407)
4. R. Gutwald, B. Alpert, and R. Schmelzeisen Principle and stability of locking plates Keio J Med 52 2003 21 24 (Pubitemid 36460531)
5. S. Uckan, A. Schwimmer, F. Kummer, and A.M. Greenberg Effect of the angle of the screw on the stability of the mandibular sagittal split ramus osteotomy: a study in sheep mandibles Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 39 2001 266 268 (Pubitemid 32700803)
6. D. Dolanmaz, S. Uckan, K. Isik, and H. Saglam Comparison of stability of absorbable and titanium plate and screw fixation for sagittal split ramus osteotomy Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 42 2004 127 132 (Pubitemid 38401330)
7. U. Cilasun, S. Uckan, D. Dolanmaz, and H. Saglam Immediate mechanical stability of sagittal split ramus osteotomy fixed with resorbable compared with titanium bicortical screws in mandibles of sheep Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 44 2006 534 537 (Pubitemid 44644920)
8. P.P. Gomes, R. Guimaraes Filho, and R. Mazzonetto Evaluation of the bending strength of rigid internal fixation with absorbable and metallic screws in mandibular ramus sagittal split osteotomy: in vitro study Pesqui Odontol Bras 17 2003 267 272
9. R.H. Haug, C.C. Street, and M. Goltz Does plate adaptation affect stability? A biomechanical comparison of locking and nonlocking plates J Oral Maxillofac Surg 60 2002 1319 1326 (Pubitemid 35266348)
10. C.P. Collins, G. Pirinjian-Leonard, A. Tolas, and R. Alcalde A prospective randomized clinical trial comparing 2.0-mm locking plates to 2.0-mm standard plates in treatment of mandible fractures J Oral Maxillofac Surg 62 2004 1392 1395 (Pubitemid 39423947)
11. R. Gutwald, P. Büscher, A. Schramm, B. Rahn, N.-C. Gellrich, and R. Schmelzeisen Biomechanical stability of an internal mini-fixation-system in maxillofacial osteosynthesis Med Biol Eng Comput 37 Suppl. 2 1999 280 281
12. E. Ellis III, and J. Graham Use of a 2.0-mm locking plate/screw system for mandibular fracture surgery J Oral Maxillofac Surg 60 2002 642 646
13. T.A. Chiodo, V.B. Ziccardi, M. Janal, and C. Sabitini Failure strength of 2.0 locking versus 2.0 conventional Synthes mandibular plates: a laboratory model J Oral Maxillofac Surg 64 2006 1475 1479 (Pubitemid 44389796)
14. K. Harada, M. Watanabe, K. Ohkura, and S. Enomoto Measure of bite force and occlusal contact area before and after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy of the mandible using a new pressure-sensitive device: a preliminary report J Oral Maxillofac Surg 58 2000 370 374