Choosing a patient-reported outcome measure

Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 47-60

  McClimans, Leah M ^b   Browne, John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE CORK   (Ireland)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Content validity; Judgement; Outcome measure; Psychometric appraisal

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); DECISION MAKING; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PSYCHOMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY; UNITED KINGDOM; UNITED STATES;

CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; GREAT BRITAIN; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT SATISFACTION; PSYCHOMETRICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESEARCH DESIGN; UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION;

EID: 79951670493     PISSN: 13867415     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11017-010-9163-8     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. J Worrall 2002 What evidence in evidence-based medicine? Philosophy of Science 69 S316 S330 10.1086/341855
2. MJ Goldenberg 2009 Iconoclast or creed? Objectivism, pragmatism, and the hierarchy of evidence Perspectives in Biological Medicine 52 168 187 10.1353/pbm.0.0080
3. N Cartwright E Munro 2010 The limitations of randomized control trials in predicting effectiveness Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16 260 266 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01382.x
4. A Garratt L Schmidt A MacIntosh, et al. 2002 Quality of life measurement: Bibliographic study of patient assessed health outcome measures British Medical Journal 324 1417 10.1136/bmj.324.7351.1417
5. US Food and Drug Administration 2009 Guidance for industry on patient-reported outcome measures: Use in medicinal product development to support labeling claims Federal Register 74 1 43
6. M Rotherman L Burke P Erickson NK Leidy DL Patrick CD Petrie 2009 Use of existing Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) instruments and their modification: The ISPOR good research practices for evaluating and documenting content validity for the use of existing instruments and their modification PRO Task Force Report Value in Health 12 8 1075 1083 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00603.x
7. S Mallinson 2002 Listening to respondents: A qualitative assessment of the Short-Form 36 Health Status Questionnaire Social Science and Medicine 54 11 21 10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00003-X (Pubitemid 33049868)
8. CE Schwartz BD Rapkin 2004 Reconsidering the psychometrics of quality of life assessment in light of response shift and appraisal Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2 14 10.1186/1477-7525-2-16 (Pubitemid 39112015)
9. MJ Westerman T Hak MA Sprangers HJ Groen G van der Wal AM The 2008 Listen to their answers: Response Behavior in the measurement of physical and role functioning Quality of Life Research 17 549 558 10.1007/s11136-008-9333-6
10. BD Rapkin CE Schwartz 2004 Toward a theoretical model of quality-of-life appraisal: Implications of findings from studies of response shift Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2 14 10.1186/1477-7525-2-14 (Pubitemid 39115369)
11. McClimans, L. 2010. A theoretical framework for patient-reported outcome measures. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 31(3): 225-240.
12. SM Hunt 1997 The problem of quality of life Quality of Life Research 6 205 212
13. Lamping, D. 2008. Presidential address given at the 2008 International Society for Quality of Life Research (ISOQoL) annual conference, Montevideo, Uruguay, October 25.
14. Gadamer, H.G. 2003. Truth and method. 2nd ed. Trans. J. Weinsheimer and D.G. Marshall. New York: Continuum Press.
15. UK Department of Health. 2007. Guidance on the routine collection of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). London: Department of Health.
16. L McClimans 2010 Towards self-determination in quality of life research Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 13 67 10.1007/s11019-009-9195-x
17. A Alexandrova 2008 First-person reports and the measurement of happiness Philosophical Psychology 21 657 669 10.1080/09515080802412552
18. Fitzpatrick, R., A. Bowling, E. Gibbons, et al. 2006. A structured review of patient-reported measures in relation to selected chronic conditions, perceptions of quality of care and carer impact. University of Oxford Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Group. http://phi.uhce.ox.ac.uk/pdf/Chronic Conditions/ch12-discussion.pdf.
19. Smith, S.C., S. Cano, D. Lamping, et al. 2005. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for routine use in treatment centres: Recommendations based on a review of the scientific evidence. Department of Public Health and Policy Documents, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. http://www.lshtm.ac. uk/php/documents/PROMS%20Final%20report%20Dec%2005.pdf.
20. Streiner, D.L., and G.R. Norman. 2003. Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21. C Terwee SDM Bot MR de Boer, et al. 2007 Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 60 34 42 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012 (Pubitemid 44856236)
22. DA Freedman DB Petitti JM Robins 2004 On the efficacy of screening for breast cancer International Journal of Epidemiology 33 43 55 10.1093/ije/dyg275 (Pubitemid 38500152)
23. EP Steinberg JM Tielsch OD Schein, et al. 1994 The VF-14: An index of functional impairment in patients with cataracts Archives of Ophthalmology 112 630 638 (Pubitemid 24155436)
24. Browne, J.P., L. Jamieson, J. Lewsey, et al. 2007. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in routine elective surgery. London: London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. http://www.lshtm.ac.uk/hsru/research/PROMs- Report-12-Dec-07.pdf.
25. N Black J Browne J van der Meulen L Jamieson L Copely J Lewsey 2009 Is there overutilization of cateract surgery in England? British Journal of Ophthalmology 93 13 17 10.1136/bjo.2007.136150
26. T Thronton 2006 Tacit knowledge as the unifying factor in evidence based medicine and clinical judgment Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities 1 2 10.1186/1747-5341-1-2
27. Wittgenstein, L. 1958. Philosophical investigations. Trans. G.E.M. Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell Press.
28. Kant, I. 1998. The critique of pure reason. Trans. P. Guyer and A.W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. J McDowell 1984 Wittgenstein on following a rule Synthese 58 325 363 10.1007/BF00485246
30. Kuhn, T. 1996. The structure of scientific revolutions. 3rd ed. Chicago: Chicago University Press.