Sludge characteristics and performances of the sequencing batch reactor at different influent phenol concentrations

Desalination

Volumn 270, Issue 1-3, 2011, Pages 181-187

  Leong, M L ^a   Lee, K M ^a   Lai, S O ^a   Ooi, B S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITI TUNKU ABDUL RAHMAN   (Malaysia)

^b SCHOOL OF PHYSICS   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Phenol; Sequencing batch reactor; Settleability; Sludge characteristics

Indexed keywords

CYCLE TIME; MORPHOLOGICAL OBSERVATIONS; OPERATIONAL MODES; PHENOL CONCENTRATION; PHENOL REMOVAL; SEQUENCING BATCH REACTORS; SETTLEABILITY; SLUDGE CHARACTERISTICS; SLUDGE MORPHOLOGY; SLUDGE SETTLEABILITY; SUSPENDED SOLIDS; SYNTHETIC WASTE WATER; TREATMENT PERFORMANCE;

BATCH REACTORS; CONCENTRATION (PROCESS); EFFLUENTS; MORPHOLOGY; PHENOLS; WASTEWATER; WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

CHEMICALS REMOVAL (WATER TREATMENT);

BIOREACTOR; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); PHENOL; POLLUTANT REMOVAL; SLUDGE; WASTE TREATMENT; WASTEWATER;

EID: 79951669718     PISSN: 00119164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2010.11.043     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Yoong E.T., Lant P.A. Biodegradation of high strength phenolic wastewater using SBR. Water Science and Technology 2001, 43(3):29-306.
2. Eriksson L., Steen I., Tendaj M. Evaluation of sludge properties at an activated sludge plant. Water Science and Technology 1992, 25:251-265.
3. Beun J.J., Hendriks A., van Loosdrecht M.C.M., Morgenroth E., Wilderer P.A., Heijnen J.J. Aerobic granulation in a sequencing batch reactor. Water Research 1999, 33(10):2283-2290.
4. Sanchez Sanchez A., Garrido J.M., Mendez R. A comparative study of tertiary membrane filtration of industrial wastewater treated in a granular and flocculent sludge SBR. Desalination 2010, 250:810-814.
5. Papadimitriou C.A., Samaras P., Sakellaropoulos G.P. Comparative study of phenol and cyanide containing wastewater in CSTR and SBR activated sludge reactors. Bioresource Technology 2009, 100:31-37.
6. Ng W.J. Sequencing batch reactor (SBR) treatment of wastewaters. Environ. Sanitation Review 1989, Environ. Sanitation Information Centre, Bangkok, Thailand.
7. Yu H.Q., Gu G.W., Song L.P. The effect of Fill mode on the performance of Sequencing Batch Reactors treating various wastewaters. Bioresource Technology 1996, 58:49-55.
8. Maranon E., Vazquez I., Rodriguez J., Castrillon L., Fernandez Y., Lopez H. Treatment of coke wastewater in a sequential batch reactor (SBR) at pilot plant scale. Bioresource Technology 2008, 99:4192-4198.
9. Benatti C.T., Tavares C.R.G., Filhoe B.P.D., Gaspar M.P. Sequencing Batch Reactor for treatment of chemical laboratory wastewater. Acta Scientianum Technology 2003, 25(2):141-145.
10. Papadimitriou Ch., Palaska G., Lazaridou M., Samaras P., Sakellaropoulos G.P. The effects of toxic substances on the activate sludge microfauna. Desalination 2007, 211:177-191.
11. Govoreanu R., Saveyn H., van der Meeren P., Vanrolleghem P.A. Simultaneous determination of activated sludge floc size distribution by different techniques. Water Science and Technology 2003, 50(12):39-46.
12. Uygur A., Kargi F. Phenol inhibition of biological nutrient removal in a four-step sequencing batch reactor. Process Biochemistry 2004, 39:2123-2128.
13. Yoong E.T., Lant P.A., Greenfield P.F. In situ respirometry in an SBR treating wastewater with high phenol concentrations. Water Resource 1999, 34(1):239-245.
14. Yu H.Q., Gu G.W. Treatment of phenolic wastewater by Sequencing Batch Reactors with aerated and unaerated fills. Water Management 1996, 16(7):561-566.
15. Hsu E.H. Treatment of a batch petrochemical wastewater in sequencing batch reactors. Environ. Progress 1986, 5:71-81.
16. Sivida M. Sequencing Batch Reactor treatment of pharmaceutical wastewater. Internal Report, National University of Singapore 1988.
17. Chiesa S.C., Irvine R.L. Growth and control of filamentous microbes in activated sludge: an integrated hypothesis. Water Resource 1985, 19:471-479.
18. Chan C.H., Lim P.E. Evaluation of sequencing batch reactor performance with aerated and unaerated FILL periods in treating phenol-containing wastewater. Bioresource Technology 2007, 98:1333-1338.
19. American Public Health Association (APHA) Standard Method for the Examination of Water and Wastewater 1998, APHA, Washington D.C. 20 Ed.
20. Singer P.L., Yen C. Adsorption of alkyl phenols by activated carbon. Activated carbon adsorption of organics from the aqueous phase 1980, 167-189. Ann Arbor Science, Michigan. M.J. McGuire, I.H. Suffet (Eds.).
21. Lee K.M. Process Serentak Penjerapan dan Penguraian untul Pengolahan sebation Alkilfenol dan Kajian Mekanismenya. Kajian Kadar Spesifik Pengambilan Oksigen (SOUR), USM Malaysia 2001.
22. Amaral A.L., Ferreira E.C. Activated sludge monitoring of a wastewater treatment plant using image analysis and partial least squares regression. Abalytuca Chimica Acta 2005, 544:246-253.
23. Gerardi M.H. Settleability problems and loss of solids in the activated sludge process. Environmental Protection Magazine Series 2002, Wiley-Interscience, New York.
24. Pujols R., Canler J.P. Biosorption and dynamics of bacterial population in activated sludge. Water Research 1992, 26:209-212.
25. Comas J., Rodriguez-Roda I., Sanchez-Marre M., Cortes U., Freixo A., Arraez J., Poch M. A knowledge-based approach to the deflocculation problem: integrating on-line, off-line and heuristic information. Water Research 2003, 37:2377-2387.
26. H.Q. Yu, Study on the characteristics and mechanism of SBRs for the treatment of refractory/ toxic wastewater, PhD thesis, Tongji University, Shanghai, China, 1994.