Is cerebral function monitoring as accurate as conventional EEG in the detection of neonatal seizures?

Archives of Disease in Childhood

Volumn 96, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 314-316

  Ray, Sagarika ^a  

^a NORTHAMPTON GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMPLITUDE ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; BRAIN FUNCTION; CASE REPORT; CONVENTIONAL ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; NEUROMONITORING; NEWBORN; NEWBORN SEIZURE; NOTE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PEDIATRICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEIZURE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TONIC SEIZURE; BRAIN; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; METHODOLOGY; MONITORING; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; REVIEW;

BRAIN; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; SEIZURES;

EID: 79951664916     PISSN: 00039888     EISSN: 14682044     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/adc.2010.210054     Document Type: Note

References (13)

1. Toet MC, van der Meij W, de Vries LS, et al. Comparison between simultaneously recorded amplitude integrated electroencephalogram (cerebral function monitor) and standard electroencephalogram in neonates. Pediatrics 2002;109:772-9. (Pubitemid 34493341)
2. Rennie JM, Chorley G, Boylan GB, et al. Non-expert use of the cerebral function monitor for neonatal seizure detection. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2004;89:F37-40.
3. Shellhaas RA, Soaita AI, Clancy RR. Sensitivity of amplitude-integrated electroencephalography for neonatal seizure detection. Pediatrics 2007;120:770-7. (Pubitemid 47549565)
4. Shah DK, Mackay MT, Lavery S, et al. Accuracy of bedside electroencephalographic monitoring in comparison with simultaneous continuous conventional electroencephalography for seizure detection in term infants. Pediatrics 2008;121:1146-54.
5. Bourez-Swart MD, van Rooij L, Rizzo C, et al. Detection of subclinical electroencephalographic seizure patterns with multichannel amplitudeintegrated EEG in full-term neonates. Clin Neurophysiol 2009;120:1916-22.
6. Volpe JJ. Perinatal brain injury: from pathogenesis to neuroprotection. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev 2001;7:56-64. (Pubitemid 32206303)
7. Scher MS, Painter MJ, Bergman I, et al. EEG diagnoses of neonatal seizures: clinical correlations and outcome. Pediatr Neurol 1989;5:17-24. (Pubitemid 19074476)
8. McBride MC, Laroi a N, Guillet R. Electrographic seizures in neonates correlate with poor neurodevelopmental outcome. Neurology 2000;55:506-13. (Pubitemid 30647245)
9. Scher MS, Alvin J, Gaus L, et al. Uncoupling of EEG-clinical neonatal seizures after antiepileptic drug use. Pediatr Neurol 2003;28:277-80. (Pubitemid 36802226)
10. de Vries LS, Hel l ström-Westas L. Rol e of cerebral function monitoring in the newborn. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2005;90:F201-7.
11. Hellström-Westas L. Comparison between tape-recorded and amplitude-integrated EEG monitoring in sick newborn infants. Acta Paediatr 1992;81:812-19.
12. Hagmann CF, Robertson NJ, Azzopardi D. Artifacts on electroencephalograms may influence the amplitude-integrated EEG classification: a qualitative analysis in neonatal encephalopathy. Pediatrics 2006;118:2552-4. (Pubitemid 46397599)
13. Shellhaas RA, Clancy RR. Characterization of neonatal seizures by conventional EEG and single-channel EEG. Clin Neurophysiol 2007;118:2156-61. (Pubitemid 47386042)