AmI in good care? Developing design principles for ambient intelligent domotics for elderly

Informatics for Health and Social Care

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 75-88

  Meulendijk, Michiel ^a   Van De Wijngaert, Lidwien ^b   Brinkkemper, Sjaak ^a   Leenstra, Herbert ^c  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^c Division of Energy Utilities and Telecom   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Ambient intelligence; domotics; elderly; obtrusiveness

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; COMPUTER INTERFACE; HUMAN; INDEPENDENT LIVING; INSTRUMENTATION; MIDDLE AGED; MOTIVATION; QUALITY OF LIFE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SELF CONCEPT; TELECOMMUNICATION; TELEMEDICINE;

AGED; ATTITUDE; HUMANS; INDEPENDENT LIVING; MIDDLE AGED; MOTIVATION; QUALITY OF LIFE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SELF EFFICACY; TELECOMMUNICATIONS; TELEMEDICINE; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 79951660019     PISSN: 17538157     EISSN: 17538165     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/17538157.2010.542528     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Statistics Netherlands. Bevolking groeit tot 17.5 miljoen in 2038 (Population grows to 17.5 million in 2038, in Dutch); 2008.
2. Van der Leeuw J. Ambient intelligent-technologie in de (woon)zorg (Ambient intelligent technology in (residential) care, in Dutch). The Netherlands: Vilans; 2007.
3. Statistics Netherlands. Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek. [Online]; 2009. http://statline.cbs.nl/StatWeb/publication/? VWT&DMSLNL&PA7042mc&D17-10,18-21,29-32,128-131,139-142,150-153, 322-325,333-336,344-347,355-358,366-369,377-380&D219-28&HD090525- 2114&HDRT&STBG1.
4. Statistics Netherlands. Meer alleenwonende ouderen (More single-living elderly, in Dutch; Press Release 01- 112). Voorburg, The Netherlands; 2001.
5. Van der Leeuw J. Handreiking domotica, personenalarmering en ICT voor ouderen (Guide domotics, personal alarms and ICT for elderly, in Dutch). Netherlands Institute for Care and Welfare; 2005.
6. Rodríguez MD, Favela J, Preciado A, Vizcaíno A. Agent-based ambient intelligence for healthcare. AI Communications 2005;18:201-216. (Pubitemid 41383224)
7. Aarts E, Marzano S. The new everyday: views on ambient intelligence Rotterdam: 010 Publishers; 2003.
8. Riva G. Ambient intelligence in health care. CyberPsychology & Behavior 2003;6:295-300. (Pubitemid 36753991)
9. Hensel BK, Demiris G, Courtney KL. Defining obtrusiveness in home telehealth technologies: a conceptual framework. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2006;13:428-431. (Pubitemid 43947625)
10. Östlund B. The deconstruction of a targetgroup for IT-innovations: elderly users technological needs and attitudes towards new IT. Nätverket - Kulturforskning 2002;11:77-93.
11. Statistics Netherlands. Statline - Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek. [Online] http://statline.cbs.nl/StatWeb/publication/? VWT&DMSLNL&PA03799&D191-93&D20-17&D30&D40, 6-9&HD100316-1017&HDRG2,G3,T&STBG1.
12. Langheinrich M. Privacy by design - principles of privacy-aware ubiquitous systems. In Ubicomp 2001: Ubiquitous Computing: International Conference. USA: Springer; 2001.
13. Coen MH. Design Principles for Intelligent Environments. In Proceedings of the 1998 National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-98). Madison, WI: American Association for Artificial Intelligence; 1998. pp 547- 554.
14. Obermair C, Ploderer B, Reitberger W, Tscheligi M. Cues in the environment: a design principle for ambient intelligence. CHI 2006 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2006. pp 1157-1162.
15. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organization Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1991;50:179-211.
16. Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 1989;13:319-340.
17. Venkatesh V, Davis FD. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Management Science 2000;46:186-204. (Pubitemid 30594361)
18. Renaud K, Biljon JV. Predicting technology acceptance and adoption by the elderly: a qualitative study. In ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. Wilderness, South Africa: ACM; 2008. pp. 210-219.
19. Felce D, Perry J. Quality of life; its definition and measurement. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2005;16:51-74.
20. Xavier FMF, Ferraz MPT, Marc N, Escosteguy NU, Moriguchi EH. Elderly people's definition of quality of life. Rev Bras Psiquiatr 2003;25:31-39. (Pubitemid 36396145)
21. Golafshani N. Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report 2004;8:597-607.
22. Denzin NK. The research act. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978.
23. Rossi PH, Nock L. Measuring social judgments: the factorial survey approach. Beverly Hills: Sage; 1982.
24. Coons SJ, Rao S, Keininger DL, Hays RD. A comparative review of generic quality-of-life instruments. Pharmacoeconomics 2000;17:13-35. (Pubitemid 30072853)
25. Oudhoff JP, Timmermans DRM, Van der Wal G. Wachten op een operatie (Waiting for a surgical procedure, in Dutch). Amsterdam; 2002.
26. Hart H, Boeije H, Hox J. Onderzoeksmethoden (Research Methods, in Dutch). Amsterdam: Boom Onderwijs; 2005.
27. Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine; 1967.
28. Boeije H. A purposeful approach to the constant comparison method in the analysis of qualitative interviews. Quality and Quantity 2002;36:391-409. (Pubitemid 37132934)
29. Abascal J. Ambient Intelligence for people with disabilities and elderly people. In SIGCHI Workshop on Ambient Intelligence for Scientific Discovery. Vienna: ACM; 2004.