Effects-driven IT development: An instrument for supporting sustained participatory design

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 61-70

  Hertzum, Morten ^a   Simonsen, Jesper ^a  

^a ROSKILDE UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Effects specification; Effects driven IT development; Formative evaluation; Organizational implementation; Pilot implementation; Prototyping; Sustained participatory design

Indexed keywords

EFFECTS SPECIFICATION; EFFECTS-DRIVEN IT DEVELOPMENT; FORMATIVE EVALUATION; ORGANIZATIONAL IMPLEMENTATION; PARTICIPATORY DESIGN; PILOT IMPLEMENTATION; PROTOTYPING;

DESIGN; RATING; SPECIFICATIONS;

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 79951635864     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1900441.1900451     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (41)

1. Berg, M., Aarts, J., and Lei, J. v. d. ICT in health care: Sociotechnical approaches. Methods of Information in Medicine, 2003, 42(4): 297-301. (Pubitemid 37288173)
2. Bødker, K., Kensing, F., and Simonsen, J. Participatory IT design: Designing for business and workplace real-ities. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. 2004.
3. Connell, K., Andal, D., and Brown, C. L. Performance based procurement. Another model for California. California Franchise Tax Board, Sacramento, CA. 1995.
4. Davis, F. D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 1989, 13(3): 319-340.
5. Dumas, J. S., and Redish, J. C. A practical guide to usability testing. Revised edition. Intellect Books, Exeter, UK. 1999.
6. Fichman, R. G., and Moses, S. A. An incremental process for software implementation. Sloan Management Re-view, 1999, 40(2): 39-52.
7. Gagnon, M., Hébert, R., Dubé, M., and Dubois, M.-F. Development and validation of an instrument measuring individual empowerment in relation to personal health care: The Health Care Empowerment Questionnaire (HCEQ). American Journal of Health Promotion, 2006, 20(6): 429-435. (Pubitemid 44330640)
8. Glass, R. L. Pilot studies: What, why, and how. Journal of Systems and Software, 1997, 36(1): 85-97.
9. Good, M., Spine, T. M., Whiteside, J., and George, P. User-derived impact analysis as a tool for usability engineering. In Proc. CHI'86, pp. 241-246. ACM Press, New York, 1986.
10. Granlien, M. F., Hertzum, M., and Gudmundsen, J. The gap between actual and mandated use of an electronic medication record three years after deployment. In S. K. Andersen, G. O. Klein, S. Schulz, J. Arts, and M. C. Mazzoleni (eds), Proc. MIE'2008, pp. 419-424. IOS Press, Amsterdam, 2008.
11. Granlien, M. S., and Hertzum, M. Implementing new ways of working: Interventions and their effect on the use of an electronic medication record. In Proc. GROUP'2009, pp. 321-330. ACM Press, New York, 2009.
12. Hamilton, S., and Chervany, N. L. Evaluating informa-tion system effectiveness - Part I: Comparing evaluation approaches. MIS Quarterly, 1981, 5(3): 55-69.
13. Harlen, W., and James, M. Assessment and learning: Differences and relationships between formative and summative assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 1997, 4(3): 365-379.
14. Hart, S. G., and Staveland, L. E. Development of NASA-TLX (task load index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In P. A. Hancock and N. Meshkati (eds), Human Mental Workload, pp. 139-183. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1988.
15. Hartswood, M., Procter, R., Slack, R., Voss, A., Büscher, M., Rouncefield, M., and Rouchy, P. Co-realization: Toward a principled synthesis of ethnomethodology and participatory design. In M. S. Ackerman, C. A. Halverson, T. D. Erickson, and W. A. Kellogg (eds), Resources, Co-Evolution and artifacts, pp. 59-94. Springer, London, 2008.
16. Hertzum, M., and Simonsen, J. Positive effects of elec-tronic patient records on three clinical activities. Inter-national Journal of Medical Informatics, 2008, 77(12): 809-817.
17. ISO 9241 Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) - Part 11: Guidance on usability. International Standard Organization, Ge-neva, CH. 1998.
18. Leveson, N. G. Intent specifications: An approach to building human-centered specifications. IEEE Trans-actions on Software Engineering, 2000, 26(1): 15-35. (Pubitemid 30584678)
19. Markus, M. L. Technochange management: Using IT to drive organizational change. Journal of Information Technology, 2004, 19(1): 4-20. (Pubitemid 38978969)
20. Maulsby, D., Greenberg, S., and Mander, R. Prototyping an intelligent agent through Wizard of Oz. In Proc. INTERCHI '93, pp. 277-284. ACM Press, New York, 1993.
21. Mechling, J. Better funding for government IT: Views from the front line. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1999, 50(4): 305-313.
22. Orlikowski, W. J., and Hofman, J. D. An improvisational model for change management: The case of group-ware technologies. Sloan Management Review, 1997, 38(2): 11-22.
23. Ottersten, I., and Balic, M. Effect managing IT. Liber, Køge. 2007.
24. Ramsay, C. R., Grant, A. M., Wallace, S. A., Garthwaite, P. H., Monk, A. F., and Russell, I. T. Assessment of the learning curve in health technologies: A systematic review. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2000, 16(4): 1095-1108.
25. Robinson, M. Design for unanticipated use... In G. De Michelis, C. Simone, and K. Schmidt (eds), Proc. ECSCW'93, pp. 187-202. Springer, Berlin, 1993.
26. Rosson, M. B., and Carroll, J. M. Usability engineering: Scenario-based development of human-computer inte-raction. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA. 2002.
27. Rzevski, G. Prototypes versus pilot systems: Strategies for evolutionary information system development. In R. Budde, K. Kuhlenkamp, L. Mathiassen, and L. Zullighoven (eds), Approaches to Prototyping: Proceed-ings on the Working Conference on Prototyping, pp. 356-367. Springer, Heidelberg, 1984. (Pubitemid 16561910)
28. Sarti, C., Rastenyte, D., Cepaitis, Z., and Tuomilehto, J. International trends in mortality from stroke, 1968 to 1994. Stroke, 2000, 31(7): 1588-1601. (Pubitemid 30437509)
29. Shapiro, D. Participatory design: The will to succeed. In Proc. AARHUS'2005 Conference on Critical Compu-ting, pp. 29-38. ACM Press, New York, 2005.
30. Simonsen, J. The role of ethnography in the design and implementation of IT systems. Design Principles and Practices, an International Journal, 2009, 3(3): 251-264.
31. Simonsen, J., and Hertzum, M. Participative design and the challenges of large-scale systems: Extending the iterative PD approach. In J. Simonsen, T. Robertson, and D. Hakken (eds), Proc. PDC'2008, pp. 1-10. ACM Press, New York, 2008.
32. Simonsen, J., and Hertzum, M. Iterative participatory design. In J. Simonsen, J. O. Bærenholdt, M. Büscher, and J. D. Scheuer (eds), Design Research: Synergies from Interdisciplinary Perspectives, pp. 16-32. Rout-ledge, London, 2010.
33. Sommerville, I. Software engineering. Seventh edition. Addison Wesley, San Francisco, CA. 2004.
34. Steinberg, D. H., and Palmer, D. W. Extreme software engineering. Pearson, Upper Saddle River, NJ. 2004.
35. Suchman, L. A. Human-machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated action, 2nd edition. Cambridge Universi-ty Press, Cambridge, UK. 2007.
36. Turner, J. R. The role of pilot studies in reducing risk on projects and programmes. International Journal of Project Management, 2005, 23(1): 1-6. (Pubitemid 40102333)
37. Tyre, M. J., and Orlikowski, W. J. Windows of opportunity: Temporal patterns of technological adaptation in organizations. Organization Science, 1994, 5(1): 98-118.
38. Vicente, K. J. Cognitive work analysis: Toward safe, productive, and healthy computer-based work. Erl-baum, Mahwah, NJ. 1999.
39. Ward, J., and Daniel, E. Benefits management: Delivering value from IS & IT investments. Wiley, Chichester, UK. 2006.
40. Whiteside, J., Bennett, J., and Holtzblatt, K. Usability engineering: Our experience and evolution. In M. He-lander (ed), Handbook of Human-Computer Interac-tion, pp. 791-817. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1988.
41. Whyte, W. F. (ed). Participatory action research. Sage, Newbury Park, CA. 1991.