Multimodal prostate registration using thin-plate splines from automatic correspondences

Proceedings - 2010 Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications, DICTA 2010

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 587-592

  Mitra, Jhimli ^a,c   Oliver, Arnau ^a   Martí, Robert ^a   Lladó, Xavier ^a   Vilanova, Joan C ^b   Meriaudeau, Fabrice ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GIRONA   (Spain)

^b HOSPITAL JOSEP TRUETA   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE BOURGOGNE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

B SPLINES; COMPUTATIONALLY EFFICIENT; CONTROL POINT; DEFORMABLE REGISTRATION; GENERATION METHOD; GEOMETRIC METHOD; INTERVENTIONAL; MULTI-MODAL; NOVEL METHODS; PATIENT DATASETS; PROSTATE BIOPSY; RADIAL BASIS FUNCTIONS; REFERENCE IMAGE; STRATEGIC CHOICE; THIN-PLATE SPLINE;

DEFORMATION; INTERPOLATION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PORE PRESSURE;

SPLINES;

EID: 79951629486     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/DICTA.2010.104     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. F. Bookstein. Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1991.
2. V. Daanen, J. Gastaldo, J. Y. Giraud, P. Fourneret, J. L. Descotes, M. Bolla, D. Collomb, and J. Troccaz. MRI/TRUS data fusion for brachytherapy. Intl. Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, 2(3):256-261, 2006. (Pubitemid 44580024)
3. B. Fei, C. Kemper, and D. L. Wilson. A comparative study of warping and rigid body registration for the prostate and pelvic MR volumes. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, 27:267-281, 2003. (Pubitemid 36298795)
4. S. Ghose, A. Oliver, R. Martí, X. Lladó, J. Freixenet, J. Vilanova, and F. Meriaudeau. Texture guided Active Appearance Model propagation for prostate segmentation. Accepted in Prostate Cancer Imaging, Computer Aided Diagnosis, Prognosis and Intervention, MICCAI workshop, 2010.
5. I. Kaplan, N. E. Oldenburg, P. Meskell, M. Blake, P. Church, and E. J. Holupka. Real time MRI-ultrasound image guided stereotactic prostate biopsy. Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 20:295-299, 2002. (Pubitemid 34791371)
6. J. Lu, R. Srikanchana, M. McClain, Y. Wang, J. Xuan, I. A. Sesterhenn, M. T. Freedman, and S. K. Mun. A statistical volumetric model for characterization and visualization of prostate cancer. Proc. of SPIE, 3976:142-153, February 2000.
7. R. Narayanan, J. Kurhanewicz, K. Shinohara, E. D. Crawford, A. Simoneau, and J. S. Suri. MRI-ultrasound registration for targeted prostate biopsy. IEEE Intl. Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, pages 991-994, 2009.
8. M. A. Padilla-Castañeda and F. Arámbula-Cosió. Resection simulations with local tissue deformations for computer assisted surgery of the prostate. MICAI, LNAI, 2313:450-459, 2002.
9. C. R. Porter, C. O'Donnell, E. D. Crawford, E. J. Gamito, J. Kim, and A. Tewari. Predicting the outcome of the random prostate biopsy. Technical report, Department of Urology, State University of New York, Stony Brook, NY. http://www.cancernews.com/data/Article/230.asp, accessed [30 May 2010].
10. K. Rohr, H. S. Stiehl, R. Sprengel, T. M. Buzug, J. Weese, and M. H. Kuhn. Landmark-based elastic registration using approximating thin-plate splines. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 20(6), June 2001.
11. D. Shepard. A two-dimensional interpolation function for irregularly-spaced data. Proceedings of the 1968 23rd ACM national conference, pages 517-524, 1968.
12. A. K. Singh, J. Kruecker, S. Xu, N. Glossop, P. Guion, K. Ullman, P. L. Choyke, and B. J. Wood. Initial clinical experience with real-time transrectal ultrasonography-magnetic resonance imaging fusion-guided prostate biopsy. British Journal of Urology (BJU) International, 101(7):841-845, April 2008. (Pubitemid 351347719)
13. S. Xu, J. Kruecker, B. Turkbey, N. Glossop, A. K. Singh, P. Choyke, P. Pinto, and B. J. Wood. Real-time MRI-TRUS fusion for guidance of targeted prostate biopsies. Computer Aided Surgery, 13(5):255-264, 2008.
14. P. Yan, S. Xu, B. Turkbey, and J. Kruecker. Optimal search guided by partial active shape model for prostate segmentation in trus images. Proceedings of SPIE Medical Imaging, 7261:72611G.1-72611G.11, 2009.