In vivo graft performance of an improved bone substitute composed of poor crystalline hydroxyapatite based biphasic calcium phosphate

Dental Materials Journal

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 21-28

  Hung, Ching Lien ^d   Yang, Jen Chang ^a   Chang, Wei Jen ^a   Hu, Chih Yuan ^a   Lin, Yong Ho ^c   Huang, Chun Hsien ^a   Chen, Chien Chung ^a   Lee, Sheng Yang ^a,b   Teng, Nai Chia ^a,b  

^a TAIPEI MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b TAIPEI MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c TAIPEI MEDICAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^d SHIN KONG WU HO SU MEMORIAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

tricalcium phosphate; Biphasic calcium phosphate; Bone graft; Hydroxyapatite; In vivo

Indexed keywords

ALVEOLAR BONES; ARTIFICIAL BONES; ARTIFICIAL DEFECTS; BIPHASIC CALCIUM PHOSPHATE; BIPHASIC CALCIUM PHOSPHATES; BONE FORMATION; BONE GRAFT; BONE REGENERATION; BONE SUBSTITUTES; CONTROL GROUPS; CRYSTALLINE HYDROXYAPATITE; CRYSTALLINE STRUCTURE; DENTAL APPLICATIONS; HISTOLOGICAL ANALYSIS; IN-VIVO; SEM; STATISTICAL DIFFERENCES; TRI-CALCIUM PHOSPHATES; XRD MEASUREMENTS;

APATITE; BIOMATERIALS; BONE; CALCIUM; CRYSTALLINE MATERIALS; DEFECTS; GRAFTING (CHEMICAL); GRAFTS; HYDROXYAPATITE; TRANSMISSION CONTROL PROTOCOL;

CALCIUM PHOSPHATE;

BIOMATERIAL; CALCIUM PHOSPHATE; HYDROXYAPATITE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BONE PROSTHESIS; BONE REGENERATION; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CRYSTALLIZATION; DOG; DOSE RESPONSE; DRUG COMBINATION; DRUG EFFECT; EVALUATION; JAW; TOOTH SOCKET; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ALVEOLAR PROCESS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BONE REGENERATION; BONE SUBSTITUTES; CALCIUM PHOSPHATES; CRYSTALLIZATION; DOGS; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; DRUG COMBINATIONS; HYDROXYAPATITES; OSSEOINTEGRATION; TOOTH SOCKET;

EID: 79951624303     PISSN: 02874547     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2010-060     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Parikh SN. Bone graft substitutes: past, present, future. J Postgrad Med 2002; 48: 142-148.
2. Khan SN, Tomin E, Lane JM. Clinical applications of bone graft substitutes. Orthop Clin North Am 2000; 31: 389-398.
3. Betz RR. Limitations of autograft and allograft: new synthetic solutions. Orthopedics 2002; 25: s561-570.
4. Giannoudis PV, Dinopoulos H, Tsiridis E. Bone substitutes: an update. Injury 2005; 36: S20-S27.
5. Jensen SS, Broggini N, Hjorting-Hansen E, Schenk R, Buser D. Bone healing and graft resorption of autograft, anorganic bovine bone and beta-tricalcium phosphate. A histologic and histomorphometric study in the mandibles of minipigs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006; 17: 237-243.
6. Le Guehennec L, Goyenvalle E, Aguado E, Houchmand-Cuny M, Enkel B, Pilet P, Daculsi G, Layrolle P. Small-animal models for testing macroporous ceramic bone substitutes. J Biomed Mater Res B 2005; 72: 69-78.
7. Daculsi G, LeGeros RZ, Deudon C. Scanning and transmission electron microscopy, and electron probe analysis of the interface between implants and host bone. Osseo-coalescence versus osseo-integration. Scanning Microsc 1990; 4: 309-314.
8. Jarcho M, Kay JF, Gumaer KI, Doremus RH, Drobeck HP. Tissue, cellular and subcellular events at a bone-ceramic hydroxylapatite interface. J Bioeng 1977; 1: 79-92.
9. Walsh WR, Vizesi F, Michael D, Auld J, Langdown A, Oliver R, Yu Y, Irie H, Bruce W. Beta-TCP bone graft substitutes in a bilateral rabbit tibial defect model. Biomaterials 2008; 29: 266-271.
10. Habibovic P, Kruyt MC, Juhl MV, Clyens S, Martinetti R, Dolcini L, Theilgaard N, van Blitterswijk CA. Comparative in vivo study of six hydroxyapatite-based bone graft substitutes. J Orthop Res 2008; 26: 1363-1370.
11. Weiss P, Layrolle P, Clergeau LP, Enckel B, Pilet P, Amouriq Y, Daculsi G, Giumelli B. The safety and efficacy of an injectable bone substitute in dental sockets demonstrated in a human clinical trial. Biomaterials 2007; 28: 3295-3305.
12. Le Nihouannen D, Daculsi G, Saffarzadeh A, Gauthier O, Delplace S, Pilet P, Layrolle P. Ectopic bone formation by microporous calcium phosphate ceramic particles in sheep muscles. Bone 2005; 36: 1086-1093.
13. Cavagna R, Daculsi G, Bouler JM. Macroporous calcium phosphate ceramic: a prospective study of 106 cases in lumbar spinal fusion. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 1999; 9: 403-412.
14. Shi H, Ma J, Zhao N, Chen Y, Liao Y. Periodontal regeneration in experimentally-induced alveolar bone dehiscence by an improved porous biphasic calcium phosphate ceramic in beagle dogs. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2008; 19: 3515-3524.
15. Ghosh SK, Nandi SK, Kundu B, Datta S, De DK, Roy SK, Basu D. In vivo response of porous hydroxyapatite and betatricalcium phosphate prepared by aqueous solution combustion method and comparison with bioglass scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res B 2008; 86: 217-227.
16. Cao W, Hench L. Bioactive materials. Ceramics Int 1996; 22: 493-507.
17. LeGeros RZ, Shirra WP, Miravite MA, Legeros JP. Amorphous calcium phosphates: synthetic and biological. Paris: Colloque Int CNRS; 1973.
18. LeGeros RZ. Calcium phosphates in oral biology and medicine. Monographs in oral aciences. Karger: Basel; 1991.
19. Pang YX, Bao X. Influence of temperature, ripening time and calcination on the morphology and crystallinity of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles. J Euro Ceram Soc 2003; 23: 1697-1704.
20. Romano FL, Ambrosano GMB, Magnani MBBdA, Nouer DF. Analysis of the coefficient of variation in shear and tensile bond strength tests. J Appl Oral Sci 2005; 13: 243-246.
21. Ruhé P, Wolke J, Spauwen P, Jansen J. Calcium phosphate ceramics for bone tissue engineering. BocaRaton, FL: CRC; 2005.
22. Bohner M. Calcium orthophosphates in medicine: from ceramics to calcium phosphate cements. Injury 2000; 31: 37-47.
23. Vaccaro AR. The role of the osteoconductive scaffold in synthetic bone graft. Orthopedics 2002; 25: s571-s578.
24. Habibovic P, Yuan H, van den Doel M, Sees TM, van Blitterswijk CA, de Groot K. Relevance of osteoinductive biomaterials in critical-sized orthotopic defect. J Orthop Res 2006; 24: 867-876.
25. Habibovic P, Yuan H, van der Valk CM, Meijer G, van Blitterswijk CA, de Groot K. 3D microenvironment as essential element for osteoinduction by biomaterials. Biomaterials 2005; 26: 3565-3575.
26. Nery EB, LeGeros RZ, Lynch KL, Lee K. Tissue response to biphasic calcium phosphate ceramic with different ratios of HA/beta TCP in periodontal osseous defects. J Periodontol 1992; 63: 729-735.
27. Fellah BH, Gauthier O, Weiss P, Chappard D, Layrolle P. Osteogenicity of biphasic calcium phosphate ceramics and bone autograft in a goat model. Biomaterials 2008; 29: 1177-1188.
28. Kwon S-H, Jun Y-K, Hong S-H, Lee I-S, Kim H-E, Won YY. Calcium phosphate bioceramics with various porosities and dissolution rates. J Amer Ceram Soc 2002; 85: 3129-3131.
29. Farina NM, Guzon FM, Pena ML, Cantalapiedra AG. In vivo behaviour of two different biphasic ceramic implanted in mandibular bone of dogs. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2008; 19: 1565-1573.
30. Oonishi H, Hench LL, Wilson J, Sugihara F, Tsuji E, Kushitani S, Iwaki H. Comparative bone growth behavior in granules of bioceramic materials of various sizes. J Biomed Mater Res B 1999; 44: 31-43.
31. Kamitakahara M, Ohtsuki C, Miyazaki T. Review paper: behavior of ceramic biomaterials derived from tricalcium phosphate in physiological condition. J Biomater Appl 2008; 23: 197-212.