Building a chain of trust: Using policy and practice to enhance trustworthy clinical data discovery and sharing

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 15-20

  Anderson, Nick ^a   Edwards, Kelly ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Clinical data; Compliance with government regulations; Data sharing; Policy governance; Translational health research; Trust

Indexed keywords

INVESTMENTS; PUBLIC POLICY;

CHAIN OF TRUST; CLINICAL DATA; CLINICAL DATA DISCOVERIES; COMPLIANCE WITH GOVERNMENT REGULATION; DATA SHARING; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HEALTH RESEARCH; POLICY GOVERNANCE; TRANSLATIONAL HEALTH RESEARCH; TRUST;

CLINICAL RESEARCH;

EID: 79951623072     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1920320.1920323     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Zerhouni EA. Translational research: moving discovery to practice. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Jan;81(1):126-8 (Pubitemid 46050877)
2. Brickell J, Shmatikov, V. The Cost of Privacy: Destruction of Data-Mining Utility in Anonymized Data Publishing. Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining Conference2008.
3. Bhumiratana, B, Bishop, M Privacy Aware Data Sharing: Balancing the Usability and Privacy of Datasets, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Pervasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments, June 2009.
4. Nussbaum M. Poetic Justice: The literary Imagination and Public Life. Boston: Beacon Press; 1995.
5. Milgram S. Behavioral study of obedience. J of Abnormal Psychology. 1963;67:371-8.
6. Harmon A. Where Did You Go with My DNA. New York Times. 2010 April 24.
7. Gamble K. High stakes: HITECH's privacy provisions will make costly security breaches even more painful to bear. Healthc Inform. 2009;26(7):42-4.
8. Yarborough M, Fryer-Edwards K, Geller G, Sharp RR. Transforming the culture of biomedical research from compliance to trustworthiness: insights from nonmedical sectors. Acad Med. 2009 Apr;84(4):472-7.
9. P. Ohm, "Broken Promises of Privacy: Responding to the Surprising Failure of Anonymization," University of Colorado Law Legal Studies Research Paper, vol. 09-12, August 13 2009.
10. Malin B. A computational model to protect patient data from location-based re-identification. Artif Intell Med. 2007 Jul;40(3):223-39. (Pubitemid 47048714)
11. Boyd AD, Hosner C, Hunscher DA, Athey BD, Clauw DJ, Green LA. An 'Honest Broker' mechanism to maintain privacy for patient care and academic medical research. Int J Med Inform. 2007 May-Jun;76(5-6):407-11. (Pubitemid 46522507)
12. Ludman EJ, Fullerton SM, Spangler L, Trinidad SB, Fujii MM, Jarvik GP, et al. Glad You Asked: Participants' Opinions Of Re-Consent for dbGap Data Submission. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2010 Sep;5(3):9-16.
13. ONCHIT Meaningful Use Final Rule. 2009. http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/ 2010/pdf/2010-17207.pdf
14. Homer N, Szelinger S, Redman M, Duggan D, Tembe W, Muehling J, et al. Resolving individuals contributing trace amounts of DNA to highly complex mixtures using highdensity SNP genotyping microarrays. PLoS Genet. 2008 Aug;4(8):e1000167.
15. Framingham Heart Study [database on the Internet]2010 [cited 10/8/10]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/gap/cgibin/study.cgi?study- id=phs000007.v1.p1.
16. dbGAP resource [database on the Internet]2010 [cited 10/8/10]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gap/.
17. GTSCB U. EnCore: Ensuring Consent and Revocation. 2010; Available from: http://www.encore-project.info/.
18. Kaufman DJ, Murphy-Bollinger J, Scott J, Hudson KL. Public opinion about the importance of privacy in biobank research. Am J Hum Genet. 2009 Nov;85(5):643-54.