Water alternatives-who and what influences public acceptance?

Journal of Public Affairs

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 49-59

  Dolnicar, Sara ^a   Hurlimann, Anna ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79951616654     PISSN: 14723891     EISSN: 14791854     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pa.378     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Alhumoud J, Behbehani H, Abdullah T. 2003. Wastewater reuse in Kuwait. The Environmentalist 23: 117-126. DOI: 10.1023/A:1024831503569
2. Bruvold WH. 1972. Public Attitudes Toward Reuse of Reclaimed Water. Water Resources Center, University of California: California.
3. Bruvold WH. 1979. Public Attitudes Toward Community Wastewater Reclamation and Reuse Options. University of California: California.
4. Bruvold WH. 1988. Public opinion on water reuse options. Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation 60: 45-49.
5. Bruvold WH. 1992. Public evaluation of municipal water reuse alternatives. Water Science and Technology 26: 1537-1543.
6. California Governor's Advisory Drought Planning Panel. 2000. Critical Water Shortage Contingency Plan. Government of California: Los Angeles.
7. Christen K. 2005. Water reuse: getting past the 'yuck factor'. Water Environment and Technology 17: 11-15.
8. Dishman M, Sherrard JH, Rebhum M. 1989. Gaining support for direct potable water reuse. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering 115: 154-161.
9. Dolnicar S. 2003. Simplifying three-way questionnaires-Do the advantages of binary answer categories compensate for the loss of information? Australia and New Zealand Marketing Academy (ANZMAC) CD Proceedings. ANZMAC: Adelaide, Australia.
10. Dolnicar S. 2004. Beyond "Commonsense Segmentation"-a systematics of segmentation approaches in tourism. Journal of Travel Research 42: 244-250. DOI: 10.1177/0047287503258830
11. Dolnicar S, Hurlimann A. 2009. Drinking water from alternative water sources: differences in beliefs, social norms and factors of perceived behavioral control across eight Australian locations. Water Science and Technology 60: 1433-1444.
12. Dolnicar S, Hurlimann A. 2010. Desalinated versus recycled water-what does the public think? In Sustainable Water for the Future: Water Recycling Versus Desalination, Escobar IC, Schäfer A (eds). Elsevier: Amsterdam; 375-388.
13. Dolnicar S, Leisch F. 2010. Evaluation of structure and reproducibility of cluster solutions using the bootstrap. Marketing Letters 21: 83-101. DOI: 10.1007/s11002-009-9083-4
14. Dolnicar S, Saunders C. 2006. Recycled water for consumer markets-a marketing research review and agenda. Desalination 187: 203-214. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2005.04.080
15. Dolnicar S, Schäfer AI. 2009. Desalinated versus recycled water: public perceptions and profiles of the accepters. Journal of Environmental Management 90: 888-900. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.02.003
16. Flack JE, Greenberg J. 1987. Public attitudes towards water conservation. Journal of the American Water Works Association 79: 46-51.
17. Formann AK. 1984. Die Latent-Class-Analyse: Einführung in die Theorie und Anwendung. Beltz: Weinheim.
18. Hartley TW. 2001. Public Perception and Participation in Water Reuse: Literature Summary. Resolve Inc.: Washington, DC.
19. Hovland CI, Janis IL, Kelley HH. 1953. Communication and Persuasion. Yale University Press: New Haven.
20. Hurlimann A. 2006. Who should manage recycled water systems? The community's perspective. WateReuse Symposium, American Water Reuse Association, Los Angeles, 10-13 September
21. Hurlimann A. 2007. Attitudes to future use of recycled water in a Bendigo office building. Water Journal of the Australian Water Association 34: 58-64.
22. Hurlimann A, Dolnicar S. 2010. When public opposition defeats alternative water projects-the case of Toowoomba Australia. Water Research 44: 287-297. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2009.09.020
23. Hurlimann A, Dolnicar S, Meyer P. 2009. Understanding behaviour to inform water supply management in developed nations-a review of literature, conceptual model and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Management 91: 47-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.07.014
24. Hurlimann A, Hemphill CE, McKay J, Geursen G. 2008. Establishing components of community satisfaction with recycled water use through a structural equation model. Journal of Environmental Management 88: 1221-1232. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.06.002
25. Hurlimann A, McKay J. 2004. Attitudes to reclaimed water for domestic use: Part 2. Trust. Water, Journal of the Australian Water Association 31: 40-45.
26. Jeffrey P, Jefferson B. 2003. Public receptivity regarding "in-house" water recycling: results from a UK survey. Water Science and Technology: Water Supply 3: 109-116.
27. Jungermann H, Pfister HR, Fischer K. 1996. Credibility, information preferences, and information interests. Risk Analysis 16: 251-261. DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1996.tb01455.x
28. Krech D, Crutchfield R, Ballachey E. 1962. Individual in Society. McGraw-Hill: New York.
29. Lohman LC, Milliken JG. 1985. Informational/Educational Approaches to Public Attitudes on Potable Reuse of Wastewater. U.S. Department of the Interior: Denver.
30. Marks JS. 2004. Back to the future: Reviewing the findings on acceptance of reclaimed water. Presented at Enviro 2004 Conference, Sydney, Australia, 29-31 March.
31. Marks JS. 2006. Taking the public seriously: the case of potable and non potable reuse. Desalination 187: 137-147. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2005.04.074
32. Marshall H. 2002. What do we do when we code data? Qualitative Research Journal 2: 56-70.
33. Mazanec J. 2000. Market segmentation. In Encyclopedia of Tourism, Jafari J (ed.). Routledge: London.
34. Menegaki A, Hanley N, Tsagarakis KP. 2006. Social acceptability and evaluation of recycled water in Crete: a study of consumers' and farmers' attitudes. Ecological Economics 62: 7-18. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.01.008
35. Miller E, Buys L. 2008. Water-recycling in South East Queensland, Australia: what do men and women think? Rural Society 18: 220-229.
36. Nancarrow B, Leviston Z, Po M, Porter N, Tucker D. 2008. What drives communities' decisions and behaviours in the reuse of wastewater. Water Science and Technology 57: 485-491.
37. Po M, Kaercher JD, Nancarrow BE. 2003. Literature Review of Factors Influencing Public Perceptions of Water Reuse. CSIRO: Perth, Australia.
38. Po M, Nancarrow BE. 2004. Literature Review: Consumer Perceptions of the Use of Reclaimed Water for Horticultural Irrigation. CSIRO: Perth, Australia.
39. Po M, Nancarrow BE, Leviston Z, Porter N, Syme GJ, Kaercher JD. 2005. Predicting Community Behaviour in Relation to Wastewater Reuse: What Drives Decisions to Accept or Reject? CSIRO: Perth, Australia.
40. Richards L. 2005. Handling Qualitative Data. Sage: London.
41. Rogers EM. 2003. Diffusion of Innovations. The Free Press: New York.
42. Selnes F. 1998. Antecedents and consequences of trust and satisfaction in buyer-seller relationships. European Journal of Marketing 32: 305-322. DOI: 10.1108/03090569810204580
43. Sims J, Baumann D. 1974. Renovate waste water: the question of public acceptance. Water Resources Research 10: 659-665. DOI: 10.1029/WR010i004p00659
44. Stempel GH. 1989. Content analysis. In Research Methods in Mass Communication, Stempel GH, Westley BH (eds). Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ; 124-136.
45. Stone R and Company Incorporated. 1974. Wastewater Reclamation: Socio-Economics, Technology, and Public Acceptance. U.S Department of the Interior: Los Angeles.
46. Syme GJ, Sadler B. 1994. Evaluation of public involvement in water resources planning. Evaluation Review 18(5): 523-542. DOI: 10.1177/0193841X9401800501
47. The Wentworth Group. 2002. Blueprint for a Living Continent. WWF Australia: Sydney.
48. Tsagarakis KP, Georgantzis N. 2003. The role of information on farmers' willingness to use recycled water for irrigation. Water Science and Technology: Water Supply 3: 105-113.
49. Tsagarakis KP, Mellon R, Stamataki E, Kounalaki E. 2007. Identification of recycled water with an empirically derived symbol increases its probability of use. Environmental Science and Technology 41: 6901-6908. DOI: 10.1021/es0627491