To agent-based simulation from system dynamics

Proceedings - Winter Simulation Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 371-382

  Macal, Charles M ^a  

^a ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGENT BASED SIMULATION; BASS MODEL; CLASSICAL MODEL; COMPLEX SOCIAL SYSTEMS; FORMAL SPECIFICATION; INNOVATION DIFFUSION; KERMACK-MCKENDRICK MODEL; LOTKA-VOLTERRA EQUATIONS; MODELING APPROACH; MODELING SOCIAL SYSTEMS; MODELING TECHNIQUE; PREDATOR-PREY RELATIONSHIPS; SIR EPIDEMIC MODEL; SYSTEM DYNAMICS; SYSTEMS OF DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; TOPDOWN;

DIFFERENCE EQUATIONS; INTEGRAL EQUATIONS; SPECIFICATIONS;

SYSTEM THEORY;

EID: 79951608890     PISSN: 08917736     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/WSC.2010.5679148     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Aleman, D. M., T. G. Wibisono, and B. Schwartz. 2009. Accounting for Individual Behaviors in a Pandemic Disease Spread Model. in Proceedings of the 2009 Winter Simulation Conference, ed. M. D. Rossetti, R. R. Hill, B. Johansson, A. Dunkin and R. G. Ingalls, 1977-1985. Piscataway, New Jersey: Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers, Inc.
2. Ascher, U. M., and L. R. Petzold. 1998. Computer methods for ordinary differential equations and differential- algebraic equations. SIAM: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
3. Bagni, R., R. Berchi and P. Cariello. 2002. A comparison of simulation models applied to epidemics, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 5(3). http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/5/3/5.html.
4. Bonabeau, E. 2001. Agent-based modeling: methods and techniques for simulating human systems. In Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences 99(3): 7280-7287.
5. Borshchev, A., and A. Filippov. 2004. From system dynamics and discrete event to practical agent based modeling: reasons, techniques, tools. The 22nd International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, July 25-29, 2004, Oxford, England.
6. Epstein, J. M. and R. Axtell, 1996, Growing artificial societies: social science from the bottom up, MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
7. Epstein, J. M., J. Parker, et al. 2008. Coupled contagion dynamics of fear and disease: mathematical and computational explorations. PLoS ONE 3(12): e3955.
8. Forrester, J. W., 1961. Industrial dynamics, MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
9. Forrester, J. W., 1971. Principles of systems, Wright-Allen Press (available from Pegasus Communications: Waltham, MA): Cambridge, MA.
10. Kermack, W. O. and A. G. McKendrick. 1927. Contributions to the mathematical theory of epidemics. Proc. Roy. Soc., To 15, (Part I, 1927).
11. Larson, R. 2007. Simple models of influenza progression within a heterogeneous population. Operations Research 55 (3): 399-412. (Pubitemid 351159499)
12. Letellier, C., S. Elaydi, L. A. Aguirre, and A. Alaoui. 2004. Difference equations versus differential equations, a possible equivalence for the Rössler system? Physica D. 195:29-49.
13. Macal, C., 2006. Methodological comparison of agent-based and system dynamics simulation, Proc. 2006 North American Association for Computational Social and Organizational Science (NAACSOS) Conference, South Bend, IN, June 22-24, available on CD.
14. Macal, C., and M. J. North. 2009. Agent-based modeling and simulation, in Proceedings of the 2009 Winter Simulation Conference, ed. M. D. Rossetti, R. R. Hill, B. Johansson, A. Dunkin and R. G. Ingalls, 86-98, Piscataway, New Jersey: Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers, Inc.
15. Marin, M., Y. Zhu, P. T. Meade, M. Sargent, and J. Warren. 2006. In Proceedings of the 2006 Winter Simulation Conference, eds. L. R. Perrone, F. P. Wieland, J. Liu, B. G. Lawson, D. M. Nicol, and R. M. Fujimoto, 667-671. Piscataway, New Jersey: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.
16. Mickens, R. E. 2002. Nonstandard finite difference schemes for differential equations, J. Diff. Eqns. Appl. 8(9):823-947.
17. Norling, E. 2007. Contrasting a system dynamics model and an agent-based model of food web evolution. in Multi-Agent-Based Simulation VII. pp. 57-68. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer Berlin/Heidelberg. Volume 4442/2007.
18. North, M. J., and C. M. Macal. 2007. Managing business complexity: discovering strategic solutions with agent-based modeling and simulation, Oxford University Press: Oxford, U.K.
19. North, M. J., C. M. Macal. 2009. Agent-based modeling and systems dynamics model reproduction, International Journal of Simulation Process Modeling 5(3): 256-271.
20. Parunak, H. V. D., R. Savit, and R. L. Riolo, Agent-based modeling vs. equation-based modeling: a case study and users' guide. Proceedings of Workshop on Modeling Agent Based Systems (MABS98), Paris, 1998.
21. Rahmandad, H., and J. Sterman. 2008. Heterogeneity and network structure in the dynamics of diffusion: comparing agent-based and differential equation models. Management Science. 54(5): 998-1014.
22. Roberts, N., D. Anderson, R. Deal, M. Garet, and W. Schaffer. 1983. Introduction to computer simulation: a system dynamics modeling approach. Addision-Wesley.
23. Scholl, H. J. 2001. Agent based and system dynamics modeling: a call for cross study and joint research, 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences ( HICSS-34)-Volume 3, pp. 3003.
24. Sterman, J. D., 2000, Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World, Boston: Irwin McGraw-Hill.
25. Wakeland, W. W., and E. J. Gallaher, L, M. Macovsky, and C. A. Aktipis. 2004. A comparison of system dynamics and agent-based simulation applied to the study of cellular receptor dynamics. 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences ( HICSS-37).