Diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of noninvasive testing for coronary artery disease

Annals of Internal Medicine

Volumn 154, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 290-

  Salavati, Ali ^a   Radmanesh, Farid ^a   Esfahani, Shadi A ^a  

^a ZENTRALKLINIK BAD BERKA   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; EXERCISE TEST; LETTER; NON INVASIVE PROCEDURE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 79951597544     PISSN: 00034819     EISSN: 15393704     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-4-201102150-00014     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Weustink AC, Mollet NR, Neefjes LA, Meijboom WB, Galema TW, van Mieghem CA, et al. Diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of noninvasive testing for coronary artery disease. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152:630-639. [PMID: 20479028]
2. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Report No. 160- Ionizing Radiation Exposure of the Population of the United States (2009). Bethesda, MD: National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements; 2009.
3. Garber AM, Solomon NA. Cost-effectiveness of alternative test strategies for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:719-728. [PMID: 10357690]
4. Mahajan N, Polavaram L, Vankayala H, Ference B, Wang Y, Ager J, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of myocardial perfusion imaging and stress echocardiography for the diagnosis of left main and triple vessel coronary artery disease: a comparative metaanalysis. Heart. 2010;96:956-966. [PMID: 20538671]
5. Einstein AJ, Moser KW, Thompson RC, Cerqueira MD, Henzlova MJ. Radiation dose to patients from cardiac diagnostic imaging. Circulation. 2007;116:1290-1305. [PMID: 17846343]