A Strain-Based Flow-Induced Hemolysis Prediction Model Calibrated by In Vitro Erythrocyte Deformation Measurements

Artificial Organs

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 145-156

  Chen, Yangsheng ^a   Sharp, M Keith ^a  

^a University of Louisville   (United States)

Author keywords

Blood; Blood damage; Microscope image; Red blood cell; Shear stress

Indexed keywords

ASPECT RATIO; BLOOD; CELLS; CYTOLOGY; DEFORMATION; FORECASTING; REYNOLDS NUMBER; SHEAR FLOW; VISCOELASTICITY;

BLOOD; BLOOD DAMAGE; CARDIOVASCULAR DEVICES; CELL DAMAGE; CELL DEFORMATION; FLOW INDUCED; FLUID STRESS; HAEMOLYSIS; MICROSCOPE IMAGES; RED BLOOD CELL;

SHEAR STRESS;

HEMOGLOBIN;

ARTICLE; CANIDAE; CELL DAMAGE; CELL DEFORMATION; CELL MEMBRANE; CELL STRAIN; CELL STRUCTURE; EQUILIBRIUM EQUATION; ERYTHROCYTE; FLUID STRESS; HEMOLYSIS; HUMAN; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; NONHUMAN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHEAR STRESS; VISCOELASTICITY;

EID: 79951595193     PISSN: 0160564X     EISSN: 15251594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2010.01050.x     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Lokhandwalla M, Sturtevant B. Mechanical hemolysis in shock wave lithotripsy (SWL): I. Analysis of cell deformation due to SWL flow fields. Phys Med Biol 2001;46:413-37.
2. Raisky F, Gauthier C, Marchal A, Blum D. Haemolyzed samples responsibility of short catheters. Ann Biol Clin Paris 1994;52:523-7.
3. Kawahito K, Nosé Y. Hemolysis in different centrifugal pumps. Artif Organs 1997;21:323-6.
4. Luckras H, Woods M, Large SR. And hemlysis goes on: ventricular assist device in combination with veno-venous hemofiltration. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;73:546-8.
5. Tsuji A, Tanabe M, Onishi K, etal. Intravascular hemolysis in aortic stenosis. Intern Med 2004;43:935-8.
6. Vavuranakis M, Tzannos KA, Thanopoulos BD, Vlasis K, Stefanadis C. Severe hemolysis complicating transcatheter occlusion of a patent ductus arteriosus: the importance of elimination of residual flow. Hellenic J Cardiol 2007;48:373-6.
7. Anil SR, Sivakumar K, Philip AK, Francis E, Kumar RK. Clinical course and management strategies for hemolysis after transcatheter closure of patent ductus arteriosus. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2003;59:538-43.
8. Dhaene M, Gulbis B, Lietaer N, etal. Red blood cell destruction in single-needle dialysis. Clin Nephrol 1989;31:327-31.
9. Fischer TM, Stohr-Liesen M, Schmid-Schonbein H. The red cell as a fluid droplet: tank tread-like motion of the human erythrocyte membrane in shear flow. Science 1978;202:894-6.
10. Secomb TW. Mechanics of red blood cells and blood flow in narrow tubes. In: Pozrikidis C, ed. Modeling and Simulation of Capsules and Biological Cells. Chapter 4. London: Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2003;168-9.
11. Pfafferott C, Nash GB, Meiselman HJ. Red blood cell deformation in shear flow: effects of internal and external phase viscosity and of in vivo aging. Biophys J 1985;47:695-704.
12. Pozrikidis C. Numerical simuation of the flow-induced deformation of red blood cells. Ann Biomed Eng 2003;31:1194-205.
13. Ramanujan S, Pozrikidis C. Deformation of liquid capsules enclosed by elastic membranes in simple shear flow: large deformations and the effect of fluid viscosities. J Fluid Mech 1998;361:117-43.
14. Goldsmith HL, Marlow J. Flow behaviour of erythrocytes. I. Rotation and deformation in dilute suspensions. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B 1972;182:351-84.
15. Sharp MK, Mohammad SF. The scaling of hemolysis in needles and catheters. Ann Biomed Eng 1998;26:788-97.
16. Heuser G, Opitz RA. Couette viscometer for short time shearing in blood. Biorheology 1980;17:17-24.
17. Giersiepen M, Wurzinger LJ, Opitz R, Reul H. Estimation of shear stress-related blood damage in heart valve prostheses: in vitro comparison of 25 aortic valves. Int J Artif Organs 1990;13:300-6.
18. Hochmuth RM, Worthy PR, Evans EA. Red cell extensional recovery and the determination of membrane viscosity. Biophys J 1979;26:101-14.
19. Mohandas N, Evans EA. Mechanical properties of the red cell membrane in relation to molecular structure and genetic defects. Ann Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 1994;23:787-818.
20. Rand RP. Mechanical properties of the red cell membrane: II. Viscoelastic breakdown of the membrane. Biophys J 1964;4:303-16.
21. Sutera SP, Mehrjardi MH. Deformation and fragmentation of human red blood cells in turbulent shear flow. Biophys J 1975;15:1-10.
22. Hellums JD, Hardwick PA. Response of platelets to shear stress-a review. In: Gross DR, Hwang NHC, eds. The Rheology of Blood, Blood Vessels and Associated Tissue. Rockville: Sijthoff & Noordhoff, 1981;160.
23. Forstrom RJ. A new measure of erythrocyte membrane strength: the jet fragility test. PhD thesis, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 1969.
24. Williams AR, Hughes DE, Hyborg WL. Hemolysis near a transversely oscillating wire. Science 1970;169:871-3.
25. Rooney JA. Hemolysis near an ultrasonically pulsating gas bubble. Science 1970;169:869-71.
26. Leverett LB, Hellums JD, Alfrey CP, Lynch EC. Red blood cell damage by shear stress. Biophys J 1972;12:257-73.
27. Williams JC, Woodward JF, Stonehill MA, Evans AP, McAteer JA. Cell damage by lithotripter shock waves at high pressure to preclude cavitation. Ultrasound Med Biol 1999;25:1445-9.
28. Lokhandwalla M. Damage mechanism in shock wave lithotripsy. PhD Thesis, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, 2001.
29. Zhao R, Antaki JF, Naik T, Bachman TN, Kameneva MV, Wu ZJ. Microscopic investigation of erythrocyte deformation dynamics. Biorheology 2006;43:747-65.
30. Richardson E. Applications of a theoretical model for haemolysis in shear flow. Biorheology 1975;12:27-37.
31. Jeffrey GB. The motion of ellipsoidal particles immersed in a viscous fluid. Proc R Soc Lond 1922;A102:161-79.
32. Arora D, Behr M, Pasquali M. A tensor-based measure for estimating blood damage. Artif Organs 2004;28:1002-15.
33. Chen Y. Analysis and experiments on flow-induced hemolysis. PhD thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Louisville, 2006.
34. Tran-Son-Tay R, Nash GB, Meiselman HJ. Effects of dextran and membrane shear rate on red cell membrane viscosity. Biorheology 1985;22:335-40.
35. White FM. Viscous Fluid Flow. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1991.
36. Hochmuth RM. Properties of red blood cells. In: Skalak R, Chien S, eds. Handbook of Bioengineering. Chapter 12. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1987;12.1-12.17.
37. Zhao Y, Sharp MK. Finite element analysis of the lift on a slightly deformable and freely rotating and translating circular cylinder in two-dimensional channel flow. J Biomech Eng 1999;121:148-52.
38. Tran-Son-Tay R, Sutera SP, Zahalak GI, Rao PR. Membrane stress and internal pressure in a red blood cell freely suspended in a shear flow. Biophys J 1987;51:915-24.
39. Keller SR, Skalak R. Motion of a tank-treading ellipsoidal particle in a shear flow. J Fluid Mech 1982;120:27-47.
40. Evans EA, Hochmuth RM. Membrane viscoelasticity. Biophys J 1976;16:1-10.
41. Evans EA, Waugh R, Melnik L. Elastic area compressibility modulus of red cell membrane. Biophys J 1976;16:585-95.
42. Waugh RE, Evans EA. Thermoelasticity of red blood cell membrane. Biophys J 1979;26:115-32.
43. Blackshear PL, Blackshear GL. Mechanical hemolysis. In: Skalak R, Chien S, eds. Handbook of Bioengineering. Chapter 15. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1987;15.1-9.
44. Fung YC. Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues, 2nd Edition. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1993;116.
45. Fischer TM. On the energy dissipation in a tank-treading human red blood cell. Biophys J 1980;32:863-8.
46. Yeleswarapu KK, Antaki JF, Kameneva MV, Rajagopal KR. A mathematical model for shear-induced hemolysis. Artif Organs 1995;19:576-82.
47. Bludszuweit C. Model for a general mechanical blood damage prediction. Artif Organs 1995;19:583-9.