Shark tales: A molecular species-level phylogeny of sharks (Selachimorpha, Chondrichthyes)

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 58, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 207-217

  Vélez Zuazo, Ximena ^a,b   Agnarsson, Ingi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO RIO PIEDRAS   (Puerto Rico)

^b EcOceanica   (Peru)

Author keywords

Elasmobranchii; Galeomorphii; Squalimorphii; Taxon sampling; Taxonomy

Indexed keywords

MITOCHONDRIAL DNA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; CELL NUCLEUS; CLASSIFICATION; DATA MINING; DNA SEQUENCE; EVOLUTION; GENETICS; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SHARK;

ANIMALS; BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; CELL NUCLEUS; DATA MINING; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SHARKS;

ANIMALIA; BATOIDEA; CARCHARHINIFORMES; CHONDRICHTHYES; ECHINORHINUS; ELASMOBRANCHII; EUSELACHII; GALEOMORPHII; HETERODONTIFORMES; HEXANCHIFORMES; HYPNOSQUALEA; LAMNIFORMES; ORECTOLOBIFORMES; PRISTIOPHORIDAE; PRISTIOPHORIFORMES; SQUALIFORMES; SQUATINIFORMES;

EID: 79951581466     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: 10959513     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2010.11.018     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Agnarsson I., May-Collado L.J. The phylogeny of Cetartiodactyla: the importance of dense taxon sampling, missing data, and the remarkable promise of cytochrome b to provide reliable species-level phylogenies. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2008, 48:964-985.
2. Anisimova M., Gascuel O. Approximate likelihood-ratio test for branches: a fast, accurate, and powerful alternative. Syst. Biol. 2006, 55:539-552.
3. Benson, D.A., Karsch-Mizrachi, I., Lipman, D.J., Ostell, J., Wheeler, D.L., 2005. GenBank Nucleic Acids Res. Update 32.
4. Bernardi G., Powers D.A. Molecular phylogeny of the prickly shark, Echinorhinus cookei, based on a nuclear (18S rRNA) and a mitochondrial (cytochrome b) gene. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 1992, 1:161-167.
5. Cavalcanti M.J. A phylogenetic supertree of the hammerhead sharks (Carcharhiniformes: Sphyrnidae). Zool. Stud. 2007, 46:6-11.
6. Compagno L.J.V. Interrelationships of living elasmobranchs. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 1973, 53:15-61.
7. Compagno L.J.V. Phyletic relationships of living sharks and rays. Am. Zool. 1977, 17:303.
8. Compagno, L.J.V., 1990. Relationships of the megamouth shark, Megachasma pelagios (Lamniformes, Megachasmidae), with comments on its feeding habits. NOAA Tech. Report NMFS 90, pp. 357-379.
9. Corrigan S., Beheregaray L.B. A recent shark radiation: molecular phylogeny, biogeography and speciation of wobbegong sharks (family: Orectolobidae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2009, 52:205-216.
10. de Carvalho M.R. Higher-level elasmobranch phylogeny, basal squaleans, and paraphyly. Interrelationships of Fishes 1996, 35-62. Academic Press, San Diego. M.L.J. Stassny, L.R. Parenti, G.D. Johnson (Eds.).
11. de Carvalho M.R., Maisey J.G. Phylogenetic relationships of the Late Jurassic shark Protospinax Woodward 1919 (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii). Mesozoic Fishes: Systematics and Paleoecology 1996, 9-46. Verlag Dr Friedrich Pfeil, Munich.
12. Dosay-Akbulut M. The phylogenetic relationship within the genus Carcharhinus. C.R. Biol. 2008, 331:500-509.
13. Douady C.J., Dosay M., Shivji M.S., Stanhope M.J. Molecular phylogenetic evidence refuting the hypothesis of Batoidea (rays and skates) as derived sharks. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2003, 26:215-221.
14. Dulvy N.K., Baum J.K., Clarke S., Compagno L.J.V., Cortés E., Domingo A., Fordham S., Fowler S., Francis M.P., Gibson C. You can swim but you can't hide: the global status and conservation of oceanic pelagic sharks and rays. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshwat. Ecosys. 2008, 18:459-482.
15. Eitner B.J. Systematics of the genus Alopias (Lamniformes: Alopiidae) with evidence for the existence of an unrecognized species. Copeia 1995, 3:562-571.
16. Faith D.P. Systematics and conservation - on predicting the feature diversity of subsets of taxa. Cladistics 1992, 8:361-373.
17. Faith D.P. Threatened species and the potential loss of phylogenetic diversity: conservation scenarios based on estimated extinction probabilities and phylogenetic risk analysis. Conserv. Biol. 2008, 22:1461-1470.
18. Ferretti F., Myers R.A., Serena F., Lotze H.K. Loss of large predatory sharks from the Mediterranean Sea. Conserv. Biol. 2008, 22:952-964.
19. Gatesy J., Hayashi C., Cronin M.A., Arctander P. Evidence from milk casein genes that cetaceans are close relatives of hippopotamid artiodactyls. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1996, 13:954-963.
20. Goloboff P.A. Analyzing large data sets in reasonable times: solutions for composite optima. Cladistics 1999, 15:415-428.
21. Goloboff P.A., Farris J.S., Nixon K.C. TNT, a free program for phylogenetic analysis. Cladistics 2008, 24:774-786.
22. Guindon S., Gascuel O. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst. Biol. 2003, 52:696-704.
23. Hebert P.D.N., Gregory T.R. The promise of DNA barcoding for taxonomy. Syst. Biol. 2005, 54:852.
24. Heinicke M.P., Naylor G.J.P., Hedges S.B. Cartilaginous fishes (Chondrichthyes). The Timetree of Life 2009, 320. Oxford University Press, New York. S.B. Hedges, S. Kumar (Eds.).
25. Heithaus M.R., Frid A., Wirsing A.J., Worm B. Predicting ecological consequences of marine top predator declines. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2008, 23:202-210.
26. Human B.A., Owen E.P., Compagno L.J.V., Harley E.H. Testing morphologically based phylogenetic theories within the cartilaginous fishes with molecular data, with special reference to the catshark family (Chondrichthyes; Scyliorhinidae) and the interrelationships within them. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2006, 39:384-391.
27. Iglésias S.P., Lecointre G., Sellos D.Y. Extensive paraphylies within sharks of the order Carcharhiniformes inferred from nuclear and mitochondrial genes. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2005, 34:569-583.
28. Irwin D.M., Arnason U. Cytochrome b gene of marine mammals: phylogeny and evolution. J. Mammal. Evol. 1994, 2:37-55.
29. Isaac N.J.B., Turvey S.T., Collen B., Waterman C., Baillie J.E.M. Mammals on the EDGE: conservation priorities based on threat and phylogeny. PLoS One 2007, 2:e296.
30. Klug S., Kriwet J. Timing of deep-sea adaptation in dogfish sharks: insights from a supertree of extinct and extant taxa. Zool. Scr. 2010, 10.1111/j.1463-6409.2010.00427.x.
31. Libralato S., Christensen V., Pauly D. A method for identifying keystone species in food web models. Ecol. Model. 2005, 195:153-171.
32. Lim D.D., Motta P., Mara K., Martin A.P. Phylogeny of hammerhead sharks (Family Sphyrnidae) inferred from mitochondrial and nuclear genes. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2010, 55:572-579.
33. Lopez J.A., Ryburn J.A., Fedrigo O., Naylor G.J. Phylogeny of sharks of the family Triakidae (Carcharhiniformes) and its implications for the evolution of carcharhiniform placental viviparity. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2006, 40:50-60.
34. Maddison W.P. Missing data versus missing characters in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 1993, 42:576-581.
35. Maddison, W.P., Maddison, D.R., 2009. Mesquite: A Modular System for Evolutionary Analysis. Version 2.72. http://www.mesquiteproject.org.
36. Mallatt J., Winchell C.J. Ribosomal RNA genes and deuterostome phylogeny revisited: more cyclostomes, elasmobranchs, reptiles, and a brittle star. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2007, 43:1005-1022.
37. Martin A.P., Pardini A.T., Noble L.R., Jones C.S. Conservation of a dinucleotide simple sequence repeat locus in sharks. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2002, 23:205-213.
38. May-Collado L.J., Agnarsson I. Cytochrome b and Bayesian inference of whale phylogeny. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2006, 38:344-354.
39. Mooers A., Faith D.P., Maddison W.P. Converting endangered species categories to probabilities of extinction for phylogenetic conservation prioritization. PLoS One 2008, 3:e3700.
40. Mortimer, J.A., Donnelly, M., 2007. Marine Turtle Specialist Group 2007 IUCN Red List Status Assessment, Hawksbill Turtle (Eretmochelys imbricata). <> (accessed 13.05.10). http://www.iucnmtsg.org/red_list/ei/.
41. Myers R.A., Worm B. Rapid worldwide depletion of predatory fish communities. Nature 2003, 423:280-283.
42. Myers R.A., Baum J.K., Shepherd T.D., Powers S.P., Peterson C.H. Cascading effects of the loss of apex predatory sharks from a coastal ocean. Science 2007, 315:1846-1850.
43. Naylor G.J.P., Ryburn J.A., Fedrigo O., López J.A. Phylogenetic relationships among the major lineages of modern elasmobranchs. Reproductive Biology and Phylogeny 2005, vol. 3:1-25. Science Publishers, Inc., Enfield, NH.
44. Nixon K.C. The parsimony ratchet, a new method for rapid parsimony analysis. Cladistics 1999, 15:407-414.
45. Posada D. jModelTest: phylogenetic model averaging. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2008, 25:1253-1256.
46. Robbins W.D., Hisano M., Connolly S.R., Choat J.H. Ongoing collapse of coral-reef shark populations. Curr. Biol. 2006, 16:2314-2319.
47. Schindler D.E., Essington T.E., Kitchell J.F., Boggs C., Hilborn R. Sharks and tunas: fisheries impacts on predators with contrasting life histories. Ecol. Appl. 2008, 12:735-748.
48. Shimada K., Rigsby C.K., Kim S.H. Labial Cartilages in the Smalltooth Sandtiger Shark, Odontaspis ferox (Lamniformes: Odontaspididae) and their significance to the phylogeny of Lamniform Sharks. Anat. Rec. Adv. Integr. Anat. Evol. Biol. 2009, 292:813-817.
49. Shimamura M., Yasue H., Ohshima K., Abe H., Kato H., Kishiro T., Goto M., Munechika I., Okada N. Molecular evidence from retroposons that whales form a clade within even-toed ungulates. Nature 1997, 388:666-670.
50. Shirai S. Phylogenetic relationships of the angel sharks, with comments on elasmobranch phylogeny (Chondrichthyes, Squatinidae). Copeia 1992, 2:505-518.
51. Shirai S. Squalean Phylogeny: A New Framework of " squaloid" Sharks and Related Taxa 1992, Hokkaido University Press, Sapporo.
52. Shirai S. Phylogenetic interrelationships of neoselachians (Chondrichthyes: Euselachii). Interrelationships of Fishes 1996, 9-34. Academic Press, San Diego. M.L.J. Stassny, L.R. Parenti, G.D. Johnson (Eds.).
53. Stanhope M.J., Waddell V.G., Madsen O., de Jong W., Hedges S.B., Cleven G.C., Kao D., Springer M.S. Molecular evidence for multiple origins of Insectivora and for a new order of endemic African insectivore mammals. PNAS 1998, 95:9967-9972.
54. Steel M., Mimoto A., Mooers A. Hedging our bets: the expected contribution of species to future phylogenetic diversity. Evol. Bioinf. 2007, 3:237-244.
55. Stelbrink B., von Rintelen T., Cliff G., Kriwet J. Molecular systematics and global phylogeography of angel sharks (genus Squatina). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2009, 54:395-404.
56. Tamura K., Dudley J., Nei M., Kumar S. MEGA4: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2007, 24:1596-1599.
57. Thompson J.D., Higgins D.G., Gibson T.J. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignments through sequence weighting, position specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994, 22:4673-4680.
58. Vaudo J.J., Heithaus M.R. Spatiotemporal variability in a sandflat elasmobranch fauna in Shark Bay, Australia. Mar. Biol. 2009, 156:2579-2590.
59. Vié J.C., Hilton-Taylor C., Pollock C., Ragle J., Smart J., Stuart S.N., Tong R. The IUCN Red List: a key conservation tool. The 2008 Review of the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2008, IUCN Gland, Switzerland. J.-C. Vié, C. Hilton-Taylor, S.N. Stuart (Eds.).
60. Winchell C.J., Martin A.P., Mallatt J. Phylogeny of elasmobranchs based on LSU and SSU ribosomal RNA genes. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2004, 31:214-224.
61. Wolsan M., Sato J.J. Effects of data incompleteness on the relative performance of parsimony and Bayesian approaches in a supermatrix phylogenetic reconstruction of Mustelidae and Procyonidae (Carnivora). Cladistics 2010, 26:168-194.