Motivating energy conservation in the workplace: An evaluation of the use of group-level feedback and peer education

Journal of Environmental Psychology

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 1-13

  Carrico, Amanda R ^a   Riemer, Manuel ^b  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b WILFRID LAURIER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Energy conservation; Environmental behavior; Feedback; Information campaign; Peer education

Indexed keywords

EID: 79951578484     PISSN: 02724944     EISSN: 15229610     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.11.004     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Abrahamse W., Steg L., Vlek C., Rothengatter T. A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2005, 25(3):273-291.
2. Abrahamse W., Steg L., Vlek C., Rothengatter T. The effect of tailored information, goal setting, and tailored feedback on household energy use, energy-related behaviors, and behavioral antecedents. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2007, 27:265-276.
3. Alcott H., Mullainathan S. Behavior and energy policy. Science 2010, 327(5970):1204-1205.
4. Ayres, I., Raseman, S., & Shih, A. (2009). Evidence from two large field experiments that peer comparison feedback can reduce residential energy usage. Unpublished manuscript, Yale University. Retrieved August 14, 2010 from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm%3Fabstract_id%3D1478804.
5. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: Towards a unifying theory of behavioral chane. Psychological Review 1977, 84:191-215.
6. Bandura A. Collective efficacy. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control 1997, 477-525. Freeman, New York. A. Bandura (Ed.).
7. Bandura A. Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2000, 9(3):75-78.
8. Becker L.J. Joint effect of feedback and goal setting on performance: A field study of residential energy conservation. Journal of Applied Psychology 1978, 63:428-433.
9. Benders R.M.T., Kok R., Moll H.C., Wiersma G., Noorman K.J. New approaches for household energy conservation - in search of personal household energy budgets and energy reduction options. Energy Policy 2006, 34(18):3612-3622.
10. Bonniface L., Henley N. 'A drop in the bucket': Collective efficacy perceptions and environmental behavior. Australian Journal of Social Issues 2008, 43:345-358.
11. Buller D.B., Morrill C., Taren D., Aickin M., Sennott-Miller L., Buller M.K., et al. Randomized trial testing the effect of peer education at increasing fruit and vegetable intake. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 1999, 91:1491-1500.
12. Buller D.B., Young W.F., Fisher K.H., Maloy J.A. The effect of endorsement by local opinion leaders and testimonials from teachers on the dissemination of a web-based smoking prevention program. Health Education Research 2007, 22(5):609-618.
13. Burn S.M. Social psychology and the stimulation of recycling behaviors: The block leader approach. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 1991, 21:611-629.
14. Carrico, A. R., Vandenbergh, M. P., Stern, P. C., Gardner, G. T., Dietz, T., & Gilligan. Energy and climate change: Key lessons for implementing the behavioral wedge. Journal of Energy and Environmental Law, in press.
15. A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior 1991, Academic Press, San Diego, CA. R.B. Cialdini, C.A. Kallgren, R.R. Reno (Eds.).
16. Cialdini R.B., Reno R.R., Kallgren C.A. A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1990, 58:1015-1026.
17. Constantinople A. Perceived instrumentality of the college as a measure of attitudes toward college. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1967, 5:196-201.
18. Costanzo M., Archer D., Aronson E., Pettigrew T. Energy conservation behavior: The difficult path from information to action. American Psychologist 1986, 41:521-528.
19. Craig C.S., McCann J.M. Assessing communication effects on energy conservation. Journal of Consumer Research 1978, 5:82-88.
20. Daamen D.D.L., Staats H., Wilke H.A.M., Engelen M. Improving environmental behavior in companies: The effectiveness of tailored versus nontailored interventions. Environment and Behavior 2001, 33:229-248.
21. Department of Trade and Industry Energy Consumption in the United Kingdom Retrieved from. http://www.bis.gov.uk/files/file11250.pdf.
22. DeVellis R.F. Scale development: Theory and application 2003, Sage Publications, Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA.
23. DeYoung R. Some psychological aspects of reduced consumption behavior - The role of intrinsic satisfaction and competence motivation. Environment and Behavior 1996, 28(3):358-409.
24. DiClemente R.J. Confronting the challenge of AIDS among adolescents: Directions for future research. Journal of Adolescent Research 1993, 8:156-166.
25. Dietz T., Gardner G.T., Gilligan J., Stern P.C., Vandenbergh M.P. Household actions can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce U.S. carbon emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2009, 106(44):18452-18456.
26. EPRI Residential electricity use feedback: A research synthesis and economic framework 2009, Palo Alto, CA.
27. Feiler D.C., Soll J.B. A blind spot in driving decisions: How neglecting costs puts us in overdrive. Climatic Change 2009, 98(1-2):277-305.
28. Fisher L.D., Dixon D.O., Herson J., Frankowski R.K., Hearon M.S., Pearce K.E. Intention to treat in clinical trials. Statistical issues in drug research and development 1990, 331-350. Marcel Dekker, New York. K.E. Pearce (Ed.).
29. The challenge of increasing proenvironment behavior 2002, John Wiley & Sons, New York. E.S. Geller (Ed.).
30. Gifford R. Psychology's essential role in climate change. Canadian Psychology/psychologie canadienne 2008, 49:273-280.
31. Goldstein N.J., Griskevicius V., Cialdini R.B. Invoking social norms - A social psychology perspective on improving hotels' Linen-Reuse programs. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly 2007, 48(2):145-150.
32. Hope K.R. Promoting behavior change in Botswana: An assessment of the peer education HIV/AIDS prevention program at the workplace. Journal of Health Communication 2003, 8:267-281.
33. Hopper J.R., Nielsen J.M. Recycling as altruistic behavior - Normative and behavioral strategies to expand participation in a community recycling program. Environment and Behavior 1991, 23(2):195-220.
34. van Houwelingen J.H., van Raaij W.F. The effect of goal-setting and daily electronic feedback on in-home energy use. Journal of Consumer Research 1989, 16:98-105.
35. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Synthesis report: Summary for policymakers. Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability 2007, 7-22. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. O.F.C.M.L. Parry, J.P. Palutikof, P.J. van der Linden, C.E. Hanson (Eds.).
36. Kaufman L. Utilities turn their customers green, with envy. The New York Times 2009, January 30, A1. Retrieved August 14, 2010 from. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/31/science/earth/31compete.html.
37. Kelly J.A. HIV risk reduction interventions for persons with severe mental illness. Clinical Psychology Review 1997, 17(3):293-309.
38. Kelly J.A., Lawrence J.S.S., Diaz Y.E., Stevenson L.Y., Hauth A.C., Brasfield T.L., et al. HIV risk behavior reduction following intervention with key opinion leaders of population - An experimental-analysis. American Journal of Public Health 1991, 81(2):168-171.
39. Kelly J.A., Murphy D.A., Sikkema K.J., McAuliffe T.L., Roffman R.A., Solomon L.J., et al. Randomised, controlled, community-level HIV-prevention intervention for sexual-risk behaviour among homosexual men in US cities. Lancet 1997, 350(9090):1500-1505.
40. Kelly J.A., Stlawrence J.S., Stevenson L.Y., Hauth A.C., Kalichman S.C., Diaz Y.E., et al. Community AIDS HIV risk reduction - the effects of endorsements by popular people in 3 cities. American Journal of Public Health 1992, 82(11):1483-1489.
41. Kluger A.N., DeNisi A. The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin 1996, 119:254-284.
42. Lachin J.M. Statistical considerations in the intent-to-treat principle. Controlled Clinical Trials 2000, 21:167-189.
43. Lam S.P. Predicting intention to save water: Theory planned behavior, response efficacy, vulnerability and perceived efficiency of alternative solutions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 2006, 36(11):2803-2824.
44. McCalley L.T., Midden C.J.H. Energy conservation through product-integrated feedback: The roles of goal-setting and social orientation. Journal of Economic Psychology 2002, 23(5):589-603.
45. McKinsey Global Institute Curbing global energy demand growth: The energy productivity opportunity Retrieved August 2, 2010 from. http://www.mckinsey.com/mgi/reports/pdfs/Curbing_Global_Energy/MGI_Curbing_Global_Energy_full_report.pdf.
46. Mellanby A.R., Phelps F.A., Crichton N.J., Tripp J.H. School sex-education - An experimental program with educational and medical benefit. British Medical Journal 1995, 311(7002):414-417.
47. Merakou K., Kourea-Kremastinou J. Peer education in HIV prevention: an evaluation in schools. European Journal of Public Health 2006, 16(2):128-132.
48. Midden C.J.H., Meter J.F., Weenig M.H., Zieverink H.J.A. Using feedback, reinforcement and information to reduce energy consumption in households: A field-experiment. Journal of Economic Psychology 1983, 3:65-86.
49. National Weather Service Degree day monitoring and data: Explanation Retrieved February 12, 2008, from. http://www.cpc.noaa.gov/products/analysis_monitoring/cdus/degree_days/ddayexp.shtml.
50. Needleman L.D., Geller E.S. Comparing interventions to motivate work-site collection of home-generated recyclables. American Journal of Community Psychology 1992, 20:775-785.
51. Nigbur D., Lyons E., Uzzell D. Attitudes, norms, identity and environmental behaviour: Using an expanded theory of planned behaviour to predict participation in a kerbside recycling programme. British Journal of Social Psychology 2010, 49:259-284.
52. Social processes and resource conservation 1983, Praeger, New York. J.M. Nielsen, B.L. Ellington (Eds.).
53. Norr K.F., Norr J.L., McElmurry B.J., Tlou S., Moeti M.R. Impact of peer group education on HIV prevention among women in Botswana. Health Care of Women International 2004, 25:210-226.
54. Ohtomo S., Hirose Y. The dual-process of reactive and intentional decision-making involved in eco-friendly behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2007, 27:117-125.
55. Petersen J.E., Shunturov V., Janda K., Platt G., Weinberger K. Dormitory residents reduce electricity consumption when exposed to real-time visual feedback and incentives. International Journal of Sustainability 2007, 8:16-33.
56. Rogers E.M., Shoemaker F.F. Communication of innovations: A cross-cultural approach 1971, The Free Press, New York.
57. Riemer M., Bickman L. Using program theory to link social psychology and program evaluation. Social psychology and program/policy evaluation 2010, Guilford, New York. M.M. Mark, S.I. Donaldson, B. Campbell (Eds.).
58. Riggs M.L., Knight P.A. The impact of perceived group success failure on motivational beliefs and attitudes - A causal model. Journal of Applied Psychology 1994, 79(5):755-766.
59. Rosenberg M.J. Cognitive structure and attitudinal affect. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 1956, 53:367-372.
60. Rothstein R.N. Television feedback used to modify gasoline consumption. Behavior Therapy 1980, 11:683-688.
61. Schultz P.W. Changing behavior with normative feedback interventions: A field experiment on curbside recycling. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 1998, 21(1):25-36.
62. Schultz P.W., Khazian A.M., Zaleski A.C. Using normative social influence to promote conservation among hotel guests. Social Influence 2008, 3:4-23.
63. Schultz P.W., Nolan J.M., Cialdini R.B., Goldstein N.J., Griskevicius V. The constructive, destructive and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychological Science 2007, 18(5):429-434.
64. Seligman C., Darley J.M. Feedback as a means of decreasing residential energy consumption. Journal of Applied Psychology 1977, 62:363-368.
65. Siero F.W., Bakker A.B., Dekker G.B., vandenBurg M.T.C. Changing organizational energy consumption behaviour through comparative feedback. Journal of Environmental Psychology 1996, 16(3):235-246.
66. Siero F.W., Van Oudenhoven J.P. The effects of contingent feedback on perceived control and performance. European Journal of Psychology of Education 1995, 10(1):13-24.
67. Simon B., Loewy M., Sturmer S., Weber U., Freytag P., Habig C., et al. Collective identification and social movement participation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1998, 74(3):646-658.
68. Singer J.D., Willett J.B. Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence 2003, Oxford University Press, New York.
69. Staats H., Harland P., Wilke H.A.M. Effecting durable change - A team approach to improve environmental behavior in the household. Environment and Behavior 2004, 36(3):341-367.
70. Starik M., Marcus A.A. Introduction to the special research forum on the management of organizations in the natural environment: A field emerging from multiple paths, with many challenges ahead. Academy of Management Journal 2000, 43:539-546.
71. Stephenson J.M., Strange V., Forrest S., Oakley A., Copas A., Allen E., et al. Pupil-led sex education in England (RIPPLE study): Cluster-randomized intervention trial. Lancet 2004, 364(9431):338-346.
72. Stern P.C., Aronson E. Energy use: The human dimension 1984, Freeman, New York.
73. Stevens S., Leybas-Amedia V., Bourdeau B., McMichael L., Nyitray A. Blending prevention models: An effective substance use and HIV prevention program for minority youth. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal 2006, 23:4-23.
74. Sturmer S., Simon B. The role of collective identification in social movement participation: A panel study in the context of the German gay movement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2004, 30(3):263-277.
75. Sturmer S., Simon B., Loewy M., Jorger H. The dual-pathway model of social movement participation: The case of the fat acceptance movement. Social Psychology Quarterly 2003, 66(1):71-82.
76. Truelove H.B. An examination of the role of efficacy in intention to mitigate climate change: Self-efficacy, response efficacy, collective efficacy and collective response efficacy. International Congress on Applied Psychology, Melbourne, Australia 2010.
77. U.S.Department of Energy Energy efficiency trends in residential and commercial buildings 2008.
78. U.S.Energy Information Administration Average retail price of electricity to ultimate customers by end-use sector, by state 2009, Retrieved from. http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/epm/table5_6_a.html.
79. Vandenbergh M.P., Barkenbus J., Gilligan J. Individual carbon emissions: The low hanging fruit. UCLA Law Review 2008, 55(1701):1701-1758.
80. Wilhite H., Ling R. Measured energy savings from a more informative energy bill. Energy and Buildings 1995, 22:145-155.
81. Wilson C., Dowlatabadi H. Models of decision making and residential energy use. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 2007, 32:169-203.
82. Young K.J., Kline J.B. Perceived self-efficcacy, outcome-efficacy and feedback: Their effects on professors' teaching development motivation. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science 1996, 28:43-51.