-
1
-
-
79951571087
-
-
registration 24-25 September 2009, London. Brussels, Belgium: European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals; November Workshop Report No. 18
-
Workshop: Enhancement of the Scientific Process and Transparency of Observational Epidemiology Studies, 24-25 September 2009, London. Brussels, Belgium: European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals; November 2009. Workshop Report No. 18. Available at: http://links.lww.com/EDE/A415.RCT registration.
-
(2009)
Workshop: Enhancement of the Scientific Process and Transparency of Observational Epidemiology Studies
-
-
-
2
-
-
4544295352
-
Clinical trial registration: A statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors
-
DOI 10.1056/NEJMe048225
-
DeAngelis C, Drazen JM, Frizelle FA, et al. Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical E (Pubitemid 39296312)
-
(2004)
New England Journal of Medicine
, vol.351
, Issue.12
, pp. 1250-1251
-
-
De Angelis, C.1
Drazen, J.M.2
Frizelle, F.A.3
Haug, C.4
Hoey, J.5
Horton, R.6
Kotzin, S.7
Laine, C.8
Marusic, A.9
Overbeke, A.J.P.M.10
Schroeder, T.V.11
Sox, H.C.12
Van Der Weyden, M.B.13
-
3
-
-
79951570910
-
Should protocols for observational studies be registered?
-
The editors
-
The editors. Should protocols for observational studies be registered? Lancet. 2010;357-348.
-
(2010)
Lancet
, pp. 357-348
-
-
-
4
-
-
77149140781
-
Registration of observational studies: The next step toward research transparency
-
Loder E, Groves T, MacCauley D. Registration of observational studies: the next step toward research transparency. BMJ. 2010;340:375-376.
-
(2010)
BMJ
, vol.340
, pp. 375-376
-
-
Loder, E.1
Groves, T.2
MacCauley, D.3
-
5
-
-
77955925111
-
The registration of observational studies-when metaphors go bad
-
The editors
-
The editors. The registration of observational studies-when metaphors go bad. Epidemiology. 2010;21:607-609.
-
(2010)
Epidemiology
, vol.21
, pp. 607-609
-
-
-
6
-
-
77955922279
-
To register or not to register
-
Samet J. To register or not to register. Epidemiology. 2010;21:610-611.
-
(2010)
Epidemiology
, vol.21
, pp. 610-611
-
-
Samet, J.1
-
7
-
-
77955925454
-
Preregistration of study proposals is unlikely to improve the yield from our sciences, but other strategies might
-
Lash TL. Preregistration of study proposals is unlikely to improve the yield from our sciences, but other strategies might. Epidemiology. 2010;21:612-613.
-
(2010)
Epidemiology
, vol.21
, pp. 612-613
-
-
Lash, T.L.1
-
8
-
-
77955919758
-
Meta-analysis protocol registration: Sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes? but who will guard the guardians?
-
Takkouche B, Norman G. Meta-analysis protocol registration: Sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes? But who will guard the guardians? Epidemiology. 2010;21:614-615.
-
(2010)
Epidemiology
, vol.21
, pp. 614-615
-
-
Takkouche, B.1
Norman, G.2
-
9
-
-
77955924681
-
A vision of accessible epidemiology
-
Poole C. A vision of accessible epidemiology. Epidemiology. 2010;21: 616-618.
-
(2010)
Epidemiology
, vol.21
, pp. 616-618
-
-
Poole, C.1
-
10
-
-
77955919258
-
Pre-registration of epidemiologic studies: An ill-founded mix of ideas
-
Vandenbroucke JP. Pre-registration of epidemiologic studies: an ill-founded mix of ideas. Epidemiology. 2010;21:619-620.
-
(2010)
Epidemiology
, vol.21
, pp. 619-620
-
-
Vandenbroucke, J.P.1
-
11
-
-
2442692780
-
Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: Comparison of protocols to published articles
-
DOI 10.1001/jama.291.20.2457
-
Chan AW, Hróbjartsson A, Haahr MT, Gøtzsche PC, Altman DG. Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles. JAMA. 2004;291: 2457-2465. PMID: 15161896. (Pubitemid 38669189)
-
(2004)
Journal of the American Medical Association
, vol.291
, Issue.20
, pp. 2457-2465
-
-
Chan, A.-W.1
Hrobjartsson, A.2
Haahr, M.T.3
Gotzsche, P.C.4
Altman, D.G.5
-
12
-
-
52649129348
-
Systematic review of the epidemiologic evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias
-
Dwan K, Altman DG, Arnaiz JA, et al. Systematic review of the epidemiologic evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias. PLoS ONE. 2008;3:e3081.
-
(2008)
PLoS ONE
, vol.3
-
-
Dwan, K.1
Altman, D.G.2
Arnaiz, J.A.3
-
13
-
-
79951566291
-
-
http://www.consort-statement.org/consort-statement/.
-
-
-
-
14
-
-
79951571698
-
-
http://www.prisma-statement.org.
-
-
-
-
15
-
-
79951568263
-
-
http://www.stard-statement.org/.
-
-
-
-
16
-
-
85041813459
-
Improving bioscience research reporting: The ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research
-
Kilkenny C, Browne WJ, Cuthill IC, Emerson M, Altman DG. Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol. 2010;8:e1000412.
-
(2010)
PLoS Biol
, vol.8
-
-
Kilkenny, C.1
Browne, W.J.2
Cuthill, I.C.3
Emerson, M.4
Altman, D.G.5
-
17
-
-
79951561979
-
-
http://www.strobe-statement.org.
-
-
-
-
18
-
-
37349036501
-
Probing STOBE
-
The editors
-
The editors. Probing STOBE. Epidemiology. 2007;18:789-790.
-
(2007)
Epidemiology
, vol.18
, pp. 789-790
-
-
-
19
-
-
79951563677
-
-
http://www.cochrane.org/.
-
-
-
-
20
-
-
79951575172
-
-
http://www.campbellcollaboration.org/.
-
-
-
-
21
-
-
79951562606
-
-
http://www.cdc.gov/genomics/hugenet/default.htm.
-
-
-
-
22
-
-
0037108235
-
Subgroup analysis, covariate adjustment and baseline comparisons in clinical trial reporting: Current practice and problems
-
Pocock SJ, Assmann SE, Enos LE, Kasten LE. Subgroup analysis, covariate adjustment and baseline comparisons in clinical trial reporting: current practice and problems. Stat Med. 2002;21:2917-2930.
-
(2002)
Stat Med
, vol.21
, pp. 2917-2930
-
-
Pocock, S.J.1
Assmann, S.E.2
Enos, L.E.3
Kasten, L.E.4
-
24
-
-
74749087796
-
The false discovery rate; A key concept in large-scale genetic studies
-
Chen JJ, Robertson PK, Schell MJ. The false discovery rate; a key concept in large-scale genetic studies. Cancer Control. 2010;17:58-62.
-
(2010)
Cancer Control
, vol.17
, pp. 58-62
-
-
Chen, J.J.1
Robertson, P.K.2
Schell, M.J.3
-
25
-
-
77950863251
-
The ongoing tyranny of statistical significance testing in biomedical research
-
Stang A, Poole C, Kuss O. The ongoing tyranny of statistical significance testing in biomedical research. Eur J Epidemiol. 2010:25;225-230.
-
(2010)
Eur J Epidemiol
, vol.25
, pp. 225-230
-
-
Stang, A.1
Poole, C.2
Kuss, O.3
-
26
-
-
77949680683
-
The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomized controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews
-
Kirkham JJ, Altman DG, Gamble C, Dodd S, Smyth R, Williamson PR. The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomized controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews. BMJ. 2010;340:c365.
-
(2010)
BMJ
, vol.340
-
-
Kirkham, J.J.1
Altman, D.G.2
Gamble, C.3
Dodd, S.4
Smyth, R.5
Williamson, P.R.6
-
27
-
-
0024238618
-
Scientific standards in epidemiologic studies of the menace of daily life
-
Feinstein AR. Scientific standards in epidemiologic studies of the menace of daily life. Science. 1989;243:1257-1263. (Pubitemid 19008055)
-
(1988)
Science
, vol.242
, Issue.4883
, pp. 1257-1263
-
-
Feinstein, A.R.1
-
28
-
-
33846563409
-
Why most published research findings are false
-
Ionnides JP. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med. 2005;8:e124.
-
(2005)
PLoS Med
, vol.8
-
-
Ionnides, J.P.1
-
29
-
-
0029049462
-
Epidemiology faces its limits
-
Taubes G. Epidemiology faces its limits. Science. 1995;269:164-169.
-
(1995)
Science
, vol.269
, pp. 164-169
-
-
Taubes, G.1
|