Improvements in hip- and pelvic motion for patients with osseointegrated trans-femoral prostheses

Gait and Posture

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 165-168

  Tranberg, R ^a   Zugner R ^a   Karrholm J ^a  

^a SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY AT UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Above knee prosthesis; Gait analysis; Low back pain; Osseointegration

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY MOVEMENT; BONE REGENERATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GAIT; GENERAL CONDITION IMPROVEMENT; HIP; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; JOINT FUNCTION; KINEMATICS; MALE; PELVIS; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE TREATMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANGE OF MOTION; TILTING; WALKING;

AMPUTEES; ARTIFICIAL LIMBS; BIOMECHANICS; FEMALE; GAIT; HIP; HUMANS; LOW BACK PAIN; MALE; MOTION; OSSEOINTEGRATION; PELVIS;

EID: 79951550208     PISSN: 09666362     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.11.004     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Kapp S.L. Transfemoral socket design and suspension options. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2000, 11(3):569-583. vi.
2. Kapp S. Suspension systems for prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999, 361:55-62.
3. Almassi F., Mousavi B., Masumi M., Souroush M.R., Honari G. Skin disorders associated with bilateral lower extremity amputation. Pak J Biol Sci 2009, 12(20):1381-1384.
4. Dillingham T.R., Pezzin L.E., MacKenzie E.J., Burgess A.R. Use and satisfaction with prosthetic devices among persons with trauma-related amputations: a long-term outcome study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2001, 80(8):563-571.
5. Hagberg K., Branemark R. Consequences of non-vascular trans-femoral amputation: a survey of quality of life, prosthetic use and problems. Prosthet Orthot Int 2001, 25(3):186-194.
6. Stam H.J., Dommisse A.M., Bussmann H.J. Prevalence of low back pain after transfemoral amputation related to physical activity and other prosthesis-related parameters. Disabil Rehabil 2004, 26(13):794-797.
7. Boonstra A.M., Schrama J., Fidler V., Eisma W.H. The gait of unilateral transfemoral amputees. Scand J Rehabil Med 1994, 26(4):217-223.
8. Lee R.Y., Turner-Smith A. The influence of the length of lower-limb prosthesis on spinal kinematics. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003, 84(9):1357-1362.
9. Hagberg K., Haggstrom E., Uden M., Brånemark R. Socket versus bone-anchored trans-femoral prostheses: hip range of motion and sitting comfort. Prosthet Orthot Int 2005, 29(2):153-163.
10. Rabuffetti M., Recalcati M., Ferrarin M. Trans-femoral amputee gait: socket-pelvis constraints and compensation strategies. Prosthet Orthot Int 2005, 29(2):183-192.
11. Brånemark R., Branemark P.I., Rydevik B., Myers R.R. Osseointegration in skeletal reconstruction and rehabilitation: a review. J Rehabil Res Dev 2001, 38(2):175-181.
12. Hagberg K., Branemark R. One hundred patients treated with osseointegrated transfemoral amputation prostheses-rehabilitation perspective. J Rehabil Res Dev 2009, 46(3):331-344.
13. Weidow J., Tranberg R., Saari T., Kärrholm J. Hip and knee joint rotations differ between patients with medial and lateral knee osteoarthritis: gait analysis of 30 patients and 15 controls. J Orthop Res 2006, 24(9):1890-1899.
14. Goujon-Pillet H., Sapin E., Fode P., Lavaste F. Three-dimensional motions of trunk and pelvis during transfemoral amputee gait. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008, 89(1):87-94.
15. Nolan L., Lees A. The functional demands on the intact limb during walking for active trans-femoral and trans-tibial amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int 2000, 24(2):117-125.
16. Nolan L., Wit A., Dudziñski K., Lees A., Lake M., Wychowañski M. Adjustments in gait symmetry with walking speed in trans-femoral and trans-tibial amputees. Gait Posture 2003, 17(2):142-151.
17. Segal A.D., Orendurff M.S., Klute G.K., McDowell M.L., Pecoraro J.A., Shofer J., et al. Kinematic and kinetic comparisons of transfemoral amputee gait using C-Leg and Mauch SNS prosthetic knees. J Rehabil Res Dev 2006, 43(7):857-870.
18. Ehde D.M., Czerniecki J.M., Smith D.G., Campbell K.M., Edwards W.T., Jensen M.P., et al. Chronic phantom sensations, phantom pain, residual limb pain, and other regional pain after lower limb amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000, 81(8):1039-1044.
19. Kulkarni J., Gaine W.J., Buckley J.G., Rankine J.J., Adams J. Chronic low back pain in traumatic lower limb amputees. Clin Rehabil 2005, 19(1):81-86.
20. Morgenroth D.C., Shakir A., Orendurff M.S., Czerniecki J.M. Low-back pain in transfemoral amputees: is there a correlation with static or dynamic leg-length discrepancy? Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2009, 88(2):108-113.
21. Sjödahl C., Jarnlo G.B., Persson B.M. Gait improvement in unilateral transfemoral amputees by a combined psychological and physiotherapeutic treatment. J Rehabil Med 2001, 33(3):114-118.