Science or ideology?

American Psychologist

Volumn 66, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 152-154

  Shedler, Jonathan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79951536724     PISSN: 0003066X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0022654     Document Type: Note

References (17)

1. Anderson E.M., Lambert M.J. Short-term dynamically oriented psychotherapy: A review and meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review 1995, 15:503-514. doi: 10.1016/0272-7358(95)00027-M.
2. Anestis M.D., Anestis J.C., Lilienfeld S.O. When it comes to evaluating psychodynamic therapy, the devil is in the details. American Psychologist 2011, 66:149-151. doi: 10.1037/a0021190.
3. Churchill R., Hunot V., Corney R., Knapp M., McGuire H., Tylee A., Wessely S. A systematic review of controlled trials of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of brief psychological treatments for depression. Health Technology Assessment 2001, 5:1-173.
4. Cuijpers P., Smit F., Bohlmeijer E., Hollon S.D., Andersson G. Efficacy of cognitive-behavioural therapyand other psychological treatments for adult depression: Meta-analytic study of publication bias. British Journal of Psychiatry 2010, 196:173-178. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.109.066001.
5. Cuijpers P., van Straten A., Bohlmeijer E., Hollon S.D., Andersson G. The effects of psychotherapy for adult depression are overestimated: A meta-analysis of study quality and effect size. Psychological Medicine 2010, 40:211-223. doi: 10.1017/S0033291709006114.
6. Driessen E., Cuijpers P., de Maat S.C.M., Abbass A.A., de Jonghe F., Dekker J.J.M. The efficacy of short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy for depression: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review 2010, 30:25-36. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2009.08.010.
7. Leichsenring F., Rabung S. Effectiveness of long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy: A meta-analysis. Journal of the American Medical Association 2008, 300:1551-1565. doi: 10.1001/jama.300.13.1551.
8. Leichsenring F., Rabung S. Analyzing effectiveness of long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy: In reply. Journal of the American Medical Association 2009, 301:932-933. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.181.
9. McKay D. Methods and mechanisms in the efficacy of psychodynamic psychotherapy. American Psychologist 2011, 66:147-148. doi: 10.1037/a0021195.
10. Shedler J.K. The efficacy of psychodynamic psychotherapy. American Psychologist 2010, 65:98-109. doi: 10.1037/a0018378.
11. Svartberg M., Styles T.C. Comparative effects of short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy: A meta-analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1991, 59:704-714. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.59.5.704.
12. Thombs B.D., Jewett L.R., Bassel M. Is there room for criticism of studies of psychodynamic psychotherapy?. American Psychologist 2011, 66:148-149. doi: 10.1037/a0021248.
13. Tryon W.W. Whatever happened to symptom substitution?. Clinical Psychology Review 2008, 28:963-968. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2008.02.003.
14. Tryon W.W., Tryon G.S. No ownership of common factors. American Psychologist 2011, 66:151-152. doi: 10.1037/a0021056.
15. Wachtel P.L. Psychoanalysis and behavior therapy: Toward an integration 1977, Basic Books, New York, NY.
16. Wachtel P.L. Psychoanalysis, behavior therapy, and the relational world 1997, Amercian Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
17. Wachtel P.L. Beyond " ESTs" : Problematic assumptions in the pursuit of evidence-based practice. Psychoanalytic Psychology 2010, 27:251-272. doi: 10.1037/a0020532.