Why it was a great victory

New York Review of Books

Volumn 55, Issue 13, 2008, Pages

  Dworkin, Ronald ^a,b  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79951531446     PISSN: 00287504     EISSN: 19447744     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (10)

1. Boumediene et al. v. Bush, President of the United States, et al., decided June 12, 2008.
2. The Supreme Court Phalanx: The Court's New Right-Wing Bloc (New York Review Books, 2008).
3. Rasul et al. v. Bush, President of the United States, et al., decided June 28, 2004.
4. Detainee Treatment Act of 2005 (H.R. 2863, Title X).
5. Jennifer Daskal, "Lawless in Guan-tánamo," http://www.salon.com/news/ feature/2008/05/02/hamdan.
6. Scalia A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law (Princeton University Press, 1998).
7. "What the Court Really Said," The New York Review, August 12, 2004.
8. Andy Worthington, "Military Judge Dashes Hopes that Guantánamo Detainees Have Rights as Prisoners of War," www.huffington post.com/andyworthington/ military-judge-dashes-hop-b-77957.html.
9. "Terror & the Attack on Civil Liberties," The New York Review, November 6, 2003.
10. Anthony Dworkin, "The Supreme Court's Guantánamo Ruling and the Future of the War on Terror." See www.crimes ofwar.org/onnews/news habeas.html.