Parts, Cavities, and Object Representation in Infancy

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 314-317

  Hayden, Angela ^a   Bhatt, Ramesh S ^a   Kangas, Ashley ^a   Zieber, Nicole ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

Infant perception; Infants' attention to object parts; Object representation; Part perception in infancy

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CHILD PSYCHOLOGY; HUMAN; INFANT; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; RECOGNITION; VIDEORECORDING;

ATTENTION; CHILD PSYCHOLOGY; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; INFANT; PHOTIC STIMULATION; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 79951527547     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0020987     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Arterberry M.E. Perceptual unit formation in infancy. Advances in psychology: Vol. 130. From fragments to objects-Segmentation and grouping in vision 2001, 37-69. Elsevier, New York, NY. T.F. Shipley, P.J. Kellman (Eds.).
2. Arterberry M.E., Yonas A. Infants' sensitivity to kinetic information for three-dimensional object shape. Perception & Psychophysics 1988, 44:1-6.
3. Arterberry M.E., Yonas A. Perception of three-dimensional shape specified by optic flow by 8-week-old infants. Perception & Psychophysics 2000, 62:550-556.
4. Baylis G.C., Driver J. Perception of symmetry and repetition within and across visual shapes: Part-descriptions and object-based attention. Visual Cognition 2001, 8:163-196.
5. Bertamini M. The importance of being convex: An advantage for convexity when judging positions. Perception 2001, 30:1295-1310.
6. Bertamini M. Who owns the contour of a visual hole?. Perception 2006, 35:883-894.
7. Bertamini M., Farrant T. Detection of change in shape and its relation to part structure. Acta Psychologica 2005, 120:35-54.
8. Bertamini M., Lawson R. Visual search for a circular region perceived as a figure versus as a hole: Evidence of the importance of part structure. Perception & Psychophysics 2006, 68:776-791.
9. Bertamini M., Lawson R. Rapid figure-ground responses to stereograms reveal an advantage for a convex background. Perception 2008, 37(4):483-494.
10. Bhatt R.S., Bertin E., Hayden A., Reed A. Face processing in infancy: Developmental changes in the use of different kinds of relational information. Child Development 2005, 76:169-181.
11. Bhatt R.S., Hayden A., Kangas A., Zieber N., Joseph J.E. Part perception in infancy: Sensitivity to the short-cut rule. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 2010, 72:1070-1078.
12. Bhatt R.S., Hayden A., Reed A., Bertin E., Joseph J.E. Infants' perception of information along object boundaries: Concavities versus convexities. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 2006, 94:91-113.
13. Bhatt R.S., Waters S.E. Perception of three-dimensional cues in early infancy. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 1998, 70:207-224.
14. Biederman I. Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review 1987, 94:115-147.
15. Bremner J.G. Perception and knowledge of the world. Introduction to infant development 2007, 137-152. Oxford University Press, New York, NY. 2nd ed. A. Slater, M. Lewis (Eds.).
16. De Winter J., Wagemans J. Segmentation of object outline into parts: A large scale integrative study. Cognition 2006, 99:275-325.
17. Gibson B.S. Visual attention and objects: One versus two or convex versus concave?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1994, 20:203-207.
18. Hayden A., Bhatt R.S., Quinn P.C. Perceptual organization based on illusory regions in infancy. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2008, 15:443-447.
19. Hoffman D.D., Richards W.A. Parts of recognition. Cognition 1984, 18:65-96.
20. Hulleman J., Humphreys G.W. Differences between searching among objects and searching among holes. Perception & Psychophysics 2005, 67(3):469-482.
21. Hulleman J., Olivers C.N.L. Concavities count for less in symmetry perception. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2007, 14(6):1212-1217.
22. Johnson S.P., Slater A. The development of intelligence in infancy. Introduction to infant development 2007, 103-118. Oxford University Press, New York, NY. 2nd ed. A. Slater, M. Lewis (Eds.).
23. Kellman P.J. The origin of object perception. Perceptual and cognitive development: Handbook of perception and cognition 1996, 3-48. Academic press, San Diego, CA. 2nd ed. R. Gelman, T.U. Au (Eds.).
24. Kellman P.J., Arterberry M.E. The cradle of knowledge: Development of perception in infancy 1998, MIT press, Cambridge, MA.
25. Koffka K. Principles of gestalt psychology 1935, Harcourt, Brace, & World, New York, NY.
26. Marr D., Nishihara H.K. Representation and recognition of three dimensional shapes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 1978, 200:269-294.
27. Nelson R., Thierman J., Palmer S.E. Shape memory for intrinsic versus accidental holes. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 2009, 71(1):200-206.
28. Palmer S.E. Hierarchical structure in perceptual representation. Cognitive Psychology 1977, 9:441-474.
29. Palmer S.E. Vision science: Photons to phenomenology 1999, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
30. Peterson M.A. On figures, grounds, and varieties of surface completion. Perceptual organization in vision: Behavioral and neural perspectives 2003, 87-116. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. R. Kimchi, M. Behrmann, C.R. Olson (Eds.).
31. Peterson M.A., Lampignano D.W. Implicit memory for novel figure-ground displays include a history of cross-border competition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2003, 29(4):808-822.
32. Peterson M.A., Salvagio E. Inhibitory competition in figure-ground perception: Context and convexity. Journal of Vision 2008, 8(16):1-13.
33. Peterson M.A., Skow E. Competition between shape properties in figure-ground perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2008, 34(2):251-267.
34. Quinn P.C. On the emergence of perceptual organization and categorization in young infants: Role for perceptual process and knowledge access. Child psychology: A handbook of contemporary issues 2006, 109-131. Psychology Press, Philadelphia, PA. 2nd ed. L. Balter, C. Tamis-LeMonda (Eds.).
35. Quinn P.C., Bhatt R.S., Hayden A. What goes with what? Development of perceptual grouping in infancy. Psychology of learning and motivation 2008, 49:105-146. Elsevier, San Diego, CA. B.H. Ross (Ed.).
36. Rosin P.L. Shape partitioning by convexity. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans 2000, 30:202-210.
37. Singh M., Hoffman D.D. Part-based representations of visual shape and implications for visual cognition. Advances in psychology: Vol. 130. From fragments to objects-Segmentation and grouping in vision 2001, 401-459. Elsevier, New York. T.F. Shipley, P.J. Kellman (Eds.).
38. Spelke E.S. Core knowledge. American Psychologist 2000, 55:1233-1243.
39. Vecera S.P., Behrmann M., Filapek J.C. Attending to parts of a single object: Part-based selection limitations. Perception & Psychophysics 2001, 63(2):308-321.