Designing effective and efficient incentive policies for renewable energy in generation expansion planning

Applied Energy

Volumn 88, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 2201-2209

  Zhou, Ying ^a   Wang, Lizhi ^a   McCalley, James D ^a  

^a Iowa State University of Science and Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

Bilevel optimization; Generation expansion planning; Incentive policy; Inverse optimization; Mandatory policy; Renewable energy

Indexed keywords

COAL INDUSTRY; COAL TRANSPORTATION; EXPANSION; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS; OPTIMIZATION; PLANNING; WIND POWER;

BI-LEVEL OPTIMIZATION; GENERATION EXPANSION PLANNING; INCENTIVE POLICY; INVERSE OPTIMIZATION; MANDATORY POLICY; RENEWABLE ENERGIES;

INVESTMENTS;

COAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ELECTRICITY GENERATION; ENERGY PLANNING; ENERGY USE; INCENTIVE; NUMERICAL MODEL; OPTIMIZATION; RENEWABLE RESOURCE;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 79951513022     PISSN: 03062619     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.12.022     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Energy Information Administration. http://www.eia.doe.gov.
2. States with Renewable Portfolio Standards. http://apps1.eere.energy.gov/states/maps/renewable_portfolio_states.cf.
3. Ahmed S., King A.J., Parija G. A multi-stage stochastic integer programming approach for capacity expansion under uncertainty. J Global Optim 2003, 26:3-24.
4. Ahuja R.K., Orlin J.B. Inverse optimization. Oper Res 2001, 49(5):771-783.
5. Antunes C.H., Martins A.G., Brito I.S. A multiple objective mixed integer linear programming model for power generation expansion planning. Energy 2004, 29:613-627.
6. Berry T., Jaccard M. The renewable portfolio standard: design considerations and an implementation survey. Energy Policy 2001, 29:263-277.
7. Blok K. Renewable energy policies in the European Union. Energy Policy 2006, 34:251-255.
8. Bloom J. Long-range generation planning using decomposition and probabilistic simulation. IEEE Trans Power Apparatus Syst 1982, 101(4):797-802.
9. Chuang A.S., Wu F., Varaiya P. A game-theoretic model for generation expansion planning: problem formulation and numerical comparisons. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2001, 16(4):885-891.
10. Chupka M.W. Designing effective renewable markets. Electricity J 2003, 16(4):46-57.
11. Duan Z, Wang L. Heuristic algorithms for the inverse mixed integer linear programming problem. J Global Optim 2011.
12. Annual Coal Report 2002, DOE/EIA-0584 (2002), Washington, DC; 2003.
13. Annual Energy Outlook 2005, DOE/EIA-0383 (2005), Washington, DC, February 2005.
14. Annual Energy Review 2002, DOE/EIA-0384 (2002), Washington, DC, October 2003.
15. DOE EIA Report: DOE/EIA-0554, June 2008 on " Generation Technologies Cost. http://www.eia.doe.gov/fuelelectric.html.
16. Fuss S., Szolgayova J., Obersteiner M., Gusti M. Investment under market and climate policy uncertainty. Appl Energy 2008, 85(8):708-721.
17. Goulder L.H. Carbon tax design and US industry performance. Tax Policy Econ 1992, 6:59-104.
18. Heuberger C. Inverse combinatorial optimization: a survey on problems, methods, and results. J Comb Optim 2004, 8:329-361.
19. Hofman K., Li X. Canada's energy perspectives and policies for sustainable development. Appl Energy 2009, 86(4):407-415.
20. Loiter J.M., Norberg-Bohm V. Technology policy and renewable energy: public roles in the development of new energy technologies. Energy Policy 1999, 27:85-97.
21. Lopez J.A., Ponnambalam K., Quintana V.H. Generation and transmission expansion under risk using stochastic programming. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2009, 22(3):1369-1378.
22. Majumdar S., Chattopadhyay D. A model for integrated analysis of generation capacity expansion and financial planning. IEEE Trans Power Syst 1999, 14(2):466-471.
23. Menke W. Geophysical data analysis: discrete inverse theory 1989, Academic Press, San Diego.
24. Meza J.L.C., Yildirim M.B., Masud A.S.M. A model for the multiperiod multiobjective power generation expansion problem. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2007, 22(2):871-878.
25. Mitchell C., Bauknecht D., Connor P.M. Effectiveness through risk reduction: a comparison of the renewable obligation in england and wales and the feed-in system in Germany. Energy Policy 2006, 24:297-305.
26. Mo B., Hegge J., Wangensteen I. Stochastic generation expansion planning by means of stochastic dynamic programming. IEEE Trans Power Syst 1991, 6(2):662-668.
27. Murphy F.H., Smeers Y. Generation capacity expansion in imperfectly competitive restructured electricity markets. Oper Res 2005, 53(4):646-661.
28. Nontechnical barriers to solar energy use: review of recent literature. http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy07osti/40116.pdf.
29. Nemet G.F., Baker E. Demand subsidies versus R& D: comparing the uncertain impacts of policy on a pre-commercial low-carbon energy technology. Energy J 2009, 30(4):873-894.
30. Palmer K., Burtraw D. Cost-effectiveness of renewable electricity policies. Energy Econ 2005, 27:873-894.
31. Quelhas A. Economic efficiency of the energy flows from the primary resource suppliers to the electric load centers. Ph.D. dissertation, Iowa State University; 2006.
32. Rader N.A., Norgaard R.B. Efficiency and sustainability in restructured electricity markets: the renewables portfolio standard. Electricity J 1996, 9(6):37-49.
33. Schweppe F.C., Caramanis M.C., Tabors R.E., Bohn R.E. Spot pricing of electricity 1998, Kluwer Academics Publishers, Boston.
34. Solomon B.D., Banerjee A. A global survey of hydrogen energy research, development and policy. Energy Policy 2006, 34(7):781-792.
35. Stigson P., Dotzauer E., Yan J. Improving policy making through government-industry policy learning: the case of a novel Swedish policy framework. Appl Energy 2009, 86(4):399-406.
36. Wang L. Cutting plane algorithms for the inverse mixed integer linear programming problem. Oper Res Lett 2009, 37(2):114-117.
37. World Energy Assessment. 2004. http://www.undp.org/energy/weaover2004.htm.
38. Zhou Y, Wang L, McCalley JD. Effective incentives design for renewable energy generation expansion planning: an inverse optimization approach. In: Proceedings of the IEEE PES general meeting; 2010.