Characterization of AhMITE1 transposition and its association with the mutational and evolutionary origin of botanical types in peanut (Arachis spp.)

Plant Systematics and Evolution

Volumn 291, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 153-158

  Gowda, M V C ^a   Bhat, R S ^a   Sujay, V ^a   Kusuma, P ^a   Varshakumari, ^a   Bhat, S ^a   Varshney, R K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (India)

^b INTERNATIONAL CROPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR THE SEMI ARID TROPICS ICRISAT   (India)

Author keywords

AhMITE1; Allopolyploidy; Botanical types; Peanut; Subspecies; Transposition activation

Indexed keywords

ARACHIS; ARACHIS HYPOGAEA; ARACHIS MONTICOLA;

EID: 79951512444     PISSN: 03782697     EISSN: 16156110     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00606-010-0373-3     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Bhat RS, Patil VU, Chandrashekar TM, Sujay V, Gowda MVC, Kuruvinashetti MS (2008) Recovering flanking sequence tags of miniature inverted-repeat transposable element by thermal asymmetric interlaced-PCR in peanut. Curr Sci 95: 452-453.
2. Chen ZJ (2007) Genetic and epigenetic mechanisms for gene expression and phenotypic variation in plant polyploids. Annu Rev Plant Biol 58: 377-406.
3. Cronn R, Wendel JF (2004) Cryptic trysts, genomic mergers, and plant speciation. New Phytol 161: 133-142.
4. Favero AP, Simpson CE, Valls JFM, Vello NA (2006) Study of the evolution of cultivated peanut through crossability studies among Arachis ipaensis, A. duranensis, and A. hypogaea. Crop Sci 46: 1546-1552.
5. Gowda MVC, Nadaf HL, Sheshagiri R (1996) The role of mutations in intraspecific differentiation of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Euphytica 90: 105-113.
6. Gowda MVC, Bhat RS, Motagi BN, Sujay V, Varshakumari, Bhat S (2010) Association of high-frequency origin of late leaf spot resistant mutants with AhMITE1 transposition in peanut. Plant Breed 129: 567-569.
7. Halward TM, Thomas Stalker H, Larue EA, Kochert G (1991) Genetic variation detectable with molecular markers among unadapted germplasm resources of cultivated peanut and related wild species. Genome 34: 1013-1020.
8. Harlan JR, de Wet JMJ (1975) On Ö Winge and a prayer: the origins of polyploidy. Bot Rev 41: 361-390.
9. He G, Prakash C (2001) Evaluation of genetic relationships among botanical varieties of cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) using AFLP markers. Genet Resour Crop Evol 48: 347-352.
10. Jiang N, Bao Z, Zhang X, Hirochika H, Eddy SR, McCouch SR et al (2003) An active DNA transposon family in rice. Nature 421: 163-167.
11. Khedikar Y, Gowda M, Sarvamangala C, Patgar K, Upadhyaya H, Varshney R (2010) A QTL study on late leaf spot and rust revealed one major QTL for molecular breeding for rust resistance in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Theor Appl Genet. doi: 10. 1007/s00122-010-1366-x.
12. Kikuchi K, Terauchi K, Wada M, Hirano HY (2003) The plant MITE mPing is mobilized in anther culture. Nature 421: 167-170.
13. Knauft DA, Gorbet DW (1989) Genetic diversity among peanut cultivars. Crop Sci 29: 1417-1422.
14. Kochert G, Stalker HT, Gimenes M, Galgaro L, Lopes CR, Moore K (1996) RFLP and cytogenetic evidence on the origin and evolution of allotetraploid domesticated peanut, Arachis hypogaea (Leguminosae). Am J Bot 83: 1282-1291.
15. Krapovickas A (1969) The origin, variability and spread of the groundnut (Arachis hypogaea). In: Ucko RJ, Dimbledy WC (eds) The domestication and exploitation of plant and animals. Gerald Duckworth Co. Ltd, London, pp 427-441.
16. Krapovickas A (1973) Evolution of the genus Arachis. In: Moav R (ed) Agricultural genetics-selected topics. Wiley, New York, pp 135-151.
17. Krapovickas A, Rigoni VA (1957) Nuevas especies de Arachis vinculadas al problema del origen del mani. Darwiniana 11: 431-455.
18. Leitch IJ, Bennett MD (1997) Polyploidy in angiosperms. Trends Plant Sci 2: 470-476.
19. Liu B, Wendel JF (2003) Epigenetic phenomena and the evolution of plant allopolyploids. Mol Phylogenet Evol 29: 365-379.
20. Madlung A, Tyagi AP, Watson B, Jiang H, Kagochi T, Doerge RW et al (2005) Genomic changes in synthetic Arabidopsis polyploids. Plant J 41: 221.
21. Masterson J (1994) Stomatal size in fossil plants: evidence for polyploidy in majority of angiosperms. Science 264: 421-424.
22. McClintock B (1984) The significance of responses of the genome to challenge. Science 226: 792-801.
23. Motagi BN, Gowda MVC, Sheshagiri R (1996) Mutants resistant to foliar diseases in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Curr Sci 71: 582-584.
24. Mouli C, Kale DM, Patil SH (1979) Sequential flowering large pod Trombay groundnuts (Abst.) Symposium on the Role of Induced Mutations in Crop Improvement Hyderabad, India.
25. Nageswara Rao G (2007) Statistics for agricultural sciences. Oxford and IBH Publishing company, New Delhi, pp 98-99.
26. Naito K, Cho E, Yang G, Campbell MA, Yano K, Okumoto Y et al (2006) Dramatic amplification of a rice transposable element during recent domestication. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 17620-17625.
27. Nakazaki T, Okumoto Y, Horibata A, Yamahira S, Teraishi M, Nishida H et al (2003) Mobilization of a transposon in the rice genome. Nature 421: 170-172.
28. Paik-Ro OG, Smith RL, Knauft DA (1992) Restriction fragment length polymorphism evaluation of six peanut species within the Arachis section. Theor Appl Genet 84: 201-208.
29. Patel M, Jung S, Moore K, Powell G, Ainsworth C, Abbott A (2004) High-oleate peanut mutants result from a MITE insertion into the FAD2 gene. Theor Appl Genet 108: 1492-1502.
30. Perry A (1968) A radiation breeding experiment with peanuts, iv. Effects of the vegetative and reproductive phases of the branching system (NC4-18. 5 KR). Rad Bot 8: 109-119.
31. Prasad MVR (1989) Genetic differentiation in Arachis hypogaea L. In: Farook SA, Khan IA (eds). Recent advances in genetics and cytogenetics. Premier Publishing House Hyderabad, India, pp 53-55.
32. Prasad MVR, Kaul S, Jain HK (1984) Induced mutants of Peanut for canopy and pod bearing characters. Indian J Genet 44: 25-34.
33. Ravi K, Hari U, Sangam D, David H, Varshney RK (2010) Genetic relationships among seven sections of genus Arachis studied by using SSR markers. BMC Plant Biol 10: 15.
34. Shan X, Liu Z, Dong Z, Wang Y, Chen Y, Lin X et al (2005) Mobilization of the active MITE transposons mPing and Pong in rice by introgression from wild rice (Zizania latifolia Griseb.). Mol Biol Evol 22: 976-990.
35. Singh AK (1988) Putative genome donors of Arachis hypogaea (Fabaceae), evidence from crosses with synthetic amphidiploids. Plant Syst Evol 160: 143-151.
36. Singh AK, Gurtu S, Jambunathan R (1993) Phylogenetic relationships in the genus Arachis based on seed protein profiles. Euphytica 74: 219-225.
37. Singh AK, Smartt J, Simpson CE, Raina SN (1998) Genetic variation vis-à-vis molecular polymorphism in groundnut, Arachis hypogaea L. Genet Resour Crop Evol 45: 119-126.
38. Soltis DE, Soltis PS (1995) The dynamic nature of polyploid genomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92: 8089-8091.
39. Stebbins GL (1951) Variation and evolution in plants. Columbia University Press, New York.
40. van den Broeck D, Maes T, Sauer M, Zethof J, De Keukeleire P, D'hauw M et al (1998) Transposon Display identifies individual transposable elements in high copy number lines. Plant J 13: 121-129.
41. Varshney RK, Bertioli DJ, Moretzsohn MC, Vadez V, Krishnamurthy L, Aruna R et al (2009) The first SSR-based genetic linkage map for cultivated groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Theor Appl Genet 118: 729-739.
42. Wessler SR (1998) Transposable elements associated with normal plant genes. Physiol Plant 103: 581-586.
43. Wessler SR (2001) Plant transposable elements. A hard act to follow. Plant Physiol 125: 149-151.
44. Wessler SR, Bureau TE, White SE (1995) LTR-retrotransposons and MITEs: important players in the evolution of plant genomes. Curr Opin Genet Dev 5: 814-821.
45. Young ND, Weeden NF, Kochert G (1996) Genome mapping in legumes (Family Fabaceae). In: Paterson AH (ed) Genome mapping in plants. Landes Biomedical Press, Austin, pp 211-277.
46. Zhang Q, Arbuckle J, Wessler SR (2000) Recent, extensive, and preferential insertion of members of the miniature inverted-repeat transposable element family Heartbreaker into genic regions of maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97: 1160-1165.