Generalized extreme value (GEV)-based error structures for multiple discrete-continuous choice models

Transportation Research Part B: Methodological

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 474-489

  Pinjari, Abdul Rawoof ^a  

^a University of South Florida   (United States)

Author keywords

Cross nested error structure; Discrete continuous models; GEV; Kuhn Tucker (KT) demand systems; MDCEV; Multiple discreteness

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; SPECIFICATIONS;

CONTINUOUS MODELS; ERROR STRUCTURES; KUHN-TUCKER; MDCEV; MULTIPLE DISCRETENESS;

ERRORS;

DISCRETE CHOICE ANALYSIS; ESTIMATION METHOD; HETEROGENEITY; HOUSEHOLD EXPENDITURE; NUMERICAL MODEL; PARAMETERIZATION; PROBABILITY; TRANSPORTATION;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 79951511872     PISSN: 01912615     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2010.09.004     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. BLS (2003) 2002 Consumer Expenditure Interview Survey Public Use Microdata Documentation. U.S. Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics, Washington, DC, http://www.bls.gov/cex/csxmicrodoc.htm#2002.
2. Ben-Akiva, M., Francois, B., 1983. μ-homogeneous Generalized Extreme Value Model. Working paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
3. Bhat C.R. A multiple discrete-continuous extreme value model: formulation and application to discretionary time-use decisions. Transportation Research Part B 2005, 39(8):679-707.
4. Bhat C.R. The multiple discrete-continuous extreme value (MDCEV) model: role of utility function parameters, identification considerations, and model extensions. Transportation Research Part B 2008, 42(3):274-303.
5. Bierlaire M. A theoretical analysis of the cross-nested logit model. Annals of Operations Research 2006, 144(1):287-300.
6. Bodea, T.D., Garrow, L.A., 2006. The importance of synthetic datasets in empirical testing: comparison of NL with MNL with error components models. In: Proceedings of the European Transport Conference, Strasbourg, September 2006.
7. Chu, C.A., 1989. Paired combinatorial logit model for travel demand analysis. In: Proceedings of 5th World Conference on Transportation Research, vol. 4. Ventura, CA, pp. 295-309.
8. Daly A., Bierlaire M. A general and operational representation of generalized extreme value models. Transportation Research Part B 2006, 40(4):285-305.
9. Ferdous N., Pinjari A.R., Bhat C.R., Pendyala R.M. A comprehensive analysis of household transportation expenditures relative to other goods and services: an application to united states consumer expenditure data. Transportation 2010, 37(3):363-390.
10. Hanemann, W.M., 1978. A Methodological and Empirical Study of Recreation Benefits from Water Quality Improvement. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Economics, Harvard University.
11. Kim J., Allenby G.M., Rossi P.E. Modeling consumer demand for variety. Marketing Science 2002, 21(3):229-250.
12. Kapur A., Bhat C.R. On modeling adults' daily time use by activity purpose and accompaniment arrangement. Transportation Research Record 2007, 2021:18-27.
13. Koppelman F.S., Wen C.-H. The paired combinatorial logit model: properties, estimation and application. Transportation Research Part B 2000, 34(2):75-89.
14. McFadden D. Modelling the choice of residential location. Spatial Interaction Theory and Residential Location 1978, 75-96. Amsterdam, North-Holland. A. Karlquist (Ed.).
15. McFadden D. Computing willingness-to-pay in random utility models. Trade, Theory and Econometrics: Essays in Honor of John S. Chipman 1999, 253-274. Routledge, London. J.C. Moore (Ed.).
16. McNeil A.J., Frey R., Embrechts P. Quantitative Risk Management: Concepts, Techniques and Tools 2005, Princeton University Press.
17. NBER, 1980-2003. The National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Archive of Consumer Expenditure Survey Microdata Extracts. http://www.nber.org/data/ces_cbo.html.
18. Newman, J., 2009. Systematically Heterogeneous Covariance in Network GEV Models. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Choice Modeling Conference, Harrogate, April 2009.
19. Pinjari A.R., Bhat C.R. A multiple discrete-continuous nested extreme value model: formulation and application to non-worker activity time-use and timing behavior on weekdays. Transportation Research Part B 2010, 44(4):562-583.
20. Sener I.N., Copperman R.B., Pendyala R.M., Bhat C.R. An analysis of children's leisure activity engagement: examining the day of week, location, physical activity level, and fixity dimensions. Transportation 2008, 35(5):673-696.
21. Small K. A discrete choice model for ordered alternatives. Econometrica 1987, 55(2):409-424.
22. Spissu E., Pinjari A.R., Bhat C.R., Pendyala R.M., Axhausen K.W. An analysis of weekly out-of-home discretionary activity participation and time-use behavior. Transportation 2009, 36(5):483-510.
23. von Haefen R.H., Phaneuf D.J. Kuhn-Tucker demand system approaches to nonmarket valuation. Applications of Simulation Methods in Environmental and Resource Economics 2005, Springer. R. Scarpa, A.A. Alberini (Eds.).
24. Vovsha P. Cross-nested logit model: an application to mode choice in tel-aviv metropolitan area. Transportation Research Record 1997, 1645:133-142.
25. Wales T.J., Woodland A.D. Estimation of consumer demand systems with binding non-negativity constraints. Journal of Econometrics 1983, 21(3):263-285.
26. Wen C.-H., Koppelman F.S. The generalized nested logit model. Transportation Research Part B 2001, 35(7):627-641.
27. Wu F., Valdez E.A., Sherris M. Simulating exchangeable multivariate Archimedean copulas and its applications. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation 2006, 36(5):1019-1034.