Access to arts beyond high school: Issues of demand and availability in American higher education

Arts Education Policy Review

Volumn 107, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 11-16

  Warburton, Edward C ^a  

^a Research for the National Dance Education Organization   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79951500256     PISSN: 10632913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3200/AEPR.107.6.11-16     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Barber, B. 1996. Serving democracy by serving the arts. Washington, DC: President’s Committee on the Arts and Humanities.
2. Berger, A., R. Kirshstein, and E. Rowe. 2001. Institutional policies and practices: Results from the 1999 National Study of Postsecondary Faculty, Institutional Survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
3. Bloom, A. 1987. The closing of the American mind. New York: Simon and Schuster.
4. Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University. 1998. Reinventing undergraduate education. New York: State University of New York at Stony Brook.
5. Breneman, D. W. 1994. Liberal arts colleges: Thriving, surviving, or endangered? Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
6. Broder, J. M. 2004. Governor seeks big cuts in California’s spending plan. New York Times, January 10.
7. Carey, N., B. Kleiner, R. Porch, and E. Farris. 2002. Arts education in public elementary and secondary schools: 1999-2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
8. Carey, N., M. Sikes, R. Foy, and J. Carpenter. 1995. Arts education in public elementary and secondary schools. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
9. Cataldi, E. F., E. M. Bradburn, and M. Fahimi. 2006. Background characteristics, work activities, and compensation of instructional faculty and staff: Fall 2003. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
10. College Board. 1999. Trends in college pricing. Washington, DC: College Board.
11. College Board. 2000. Trends in college pricing. Washington, DC: College Board.
12. Consortium of National Arts Education Associations. 1994. National standards for arts education. Reston, VA: Music Educators National Conference.
13. Dunn, O. J. 1961. Multiple comparisons among means. Journal of the American Statistical Association 56:52-64.
14. El-Khawas, E. 1995. Campus trends 1995. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
15. Fiske, E. B., ed. 1999. Champions of change: The impact of the arts on learning. Washington, DC: Arts Education Partnership and the President’s Committee on the Arts and Humanities.
16. Gappa, J. M., and D. W. Leslie. 1993. The invisible faculty: Improving the status of part-timers in higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
17. Gardner, H. 1991. The unschooled mind: How children think and how schools should teach. New York: Basic Books.
18. Gardner, H. 1999. The disciplined mind. New York: Penguin.
19. Glover, D., and B. Parsad. 2002. The gender and racial/ethnic composition of postsecondary instructional faculty and staff, 1992-98. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
20. Hagood, T. K. 2000. A history of dance in American higher education: Dance and the American university. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press.
21. Heilbrun, J., and C. M. Grey. 2001. The economics of art and culture. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.
22. Hovey, H. 1999. State spending for higher education in the next decade: The battle to sustain current support. San Jose, CA: National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education.
23. Huber, T. 1992. How professors play the cat guarding the cream. Fairfax, VA: George Mason University Press.
24. Kirshstein, R. J., N. Matheson, and Z. Jing. 1997. Instructional faculty and staff in higher education institutions: Fall 1987 and fall 1992. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
25. Kirshstein, R. J., A. O’Malley, and C. Rodriguez. 1996. Institutional responses to higher education cost pressures in the 1990s. Washington, DC: Pelavin Research Institute.
26. Longley, L., ed. 1999. Gaining the arts advantage: Lessons from school districts that value arts education. Washington, DC: Arts Education Partnership and the President’s Committee on the Arts and the Humanities.
27. National Endowment for the Arts. 1988. Toward civilization: A report on arts education. Washington, DC: National Endowment for the Arts.
28. Parsad, B., and D. Glover. 2002. Tenure status of postsecondary instructional faculty and staff: 1992-98. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
29. Persky, H. R., B. A. Sandene, and J. M. Askew. 1998. The NEAP 1997 arts report card: Eight grade findings from the National Assessment of Educational Progress. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
30. President’s Committee on the Arts and Humanities. 1997. Creative America: A report to the president. Washington, DC: President’s Committee on the Arts and Humanities.
31. Prioleau, D. 2001. Leadership of the arts in higher education. Journal of Dance Education 1 (2): 55-62.
32. Rappaport, S. 2003. Envisioning a new community for the arts. UC Santa Cruz Review 41 (2): 18-19.
33. Schmidt, P. 1999. As economy chugs along, states pour money into higher education. Chronicle of Higher Education, December 17, A28-A29.
34. Warburton, E. C., X. Chen, and E. M. Bradburn. 2002. Teaching with technology: Use of telecommunications technology by postsecondary instructional faculty and staff in fall 1998. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
35. Wilson, R. 1999. Yale relies on TA’s and adjuncts for teaching, report says. Chronicle of Higher Education, April 9, A15-A16.
36. Winter, Greg. 2004. College endowments make happy discovery: Black ink. New York Times, January 20, A17.
37. Zimbler, L. 2001. Background characteristics, work activities, and compensation of faculty and instructional staff in postsecondary institutions: Fall 1998. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
38. Zumeta, W. 2001. Higher education finance in the nineties: Lessons for the new millennium. In The NEA 2001 almanac of higher education, ed. National Education Association. Washington, DC: National Education Association.