Distributive impacts of demand-based modelling

Transportmetrica

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 181-200

  Martens, Karel ^a   Hurvitz, Eyal ^b  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^b TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Accessibility; Distributive justice; Four step model; Social justice; Transport modelling

Indexed keywords

ACCESSIBILITY; DISTRIBUTIVE JUSTICE; FOUR-STEP MODEL; SOCIAL JUSTICE; TRANSPORT MODELLING;

INVESTMENTS; POPULATION DISTRIBUTION;

TRANSPORTATION;

EID: 79951497683     PISSN: 18128602     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/18128600903322333     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Altshuler, A., 1979. The Urban Transportation System. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Bates, J., 2000. History of demand modelling. In: D.A. Hensher and K.J. Button, eds. Handbook of Transport Modelling. Oxford: Pergamon, 11-34.
3. Beatley, T., 1988. Equity and distributional issues in infrastructure planning: a theoretical perspective. In: J. M. Stein, ed. Public Infrastructure Planning and Management. Newbury Park: Sage, 208-226.
4. Ben-Akiva, M. and Lerman, S.R., 1985. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Blumenberg, E.A., 2004. Engendering effective planning: spatial mismatch, low-income women, and transportation policy. Journal of the American Planning Association, 70 (3), 269-281.
6. Blumenberg, E.A. and Schweitzer, L.A., 2006. Devolution and transport policy for the working poor: the case of the US job access and reverse commute program. Planning Theory & Practice, 7 (1), 7-25.
7. Boschmann, E.E. and Kwan, M.-P., 2008. Toward socially sustainable urban transportation: progress and potentials. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 2 (3), 138-157.
8. Boucher, D. and Kelly, P., 1998. Introduction. In: D. Boucher and P. Kelly, eds. Social Justice: From Hume to Walzer. London/New York: Routledge, 1-16.
9. Braybrooke, D., 1987. Meeting Needs. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10. Castiglione, J., et al., 2006. Application of a travel demand microsimulation model for equity analysis. 84th annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board Record. Washington.
11. Cebollada, Á., 2008. Mobility and labour market exclusion in the Barcelona metropolitan region. Journal of Transport Geography, 17 (3), 226-233.
12. Cervero, R., 1981. Efficiency and equity impacts of current transit fare policies. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 799, 7-15.
13. Cha, H.-S. and Murray, A.T., 2002. Assessing Public Transit Service Equity in Colombus, Ohio. Los Angeles: The Association of American Geographers.
14. Committee for Determination of the State of the Practice in Metropolitan Area Travel Forecasting, 2007. Metropolitan Travel Forecasting: Current Practice and Future Direction. Washington DC: Transportation Research Board.
15. de Dios Ortuzar, J. and Willumsen, L.G., 2001. Modelling Transport. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
16. Deakin, E. and G. Harvey (1996) Transportation pricing strategies for California: an assessment of congestion, emissions, energy and equity impacts: final report. Report Prepared for the California Air Resources Board.
17. Dong, X., et al., 2006. Moving from trip-based to activity-based measures of accessibility. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 40 (2), 163-180.
18. Elster, J., 1992. Local Justice: How Institutions Allocate Scarce Goods and Necessary Burdens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Farrington, J. and Farrington, C., 2005. Rural accessibility, social inclusion and social justice: towards conceptualisation. Journal of Transport Geography, 13 (1 SPEC. ISS.), 1-12.
20. Garb, Y. and Levine, J., 2002. Congestion pricing's conditional promise: promotion of accessibility or mobility?. Transport Policy, 9 (3), 179-188.
21. Geurs, K.T. and Ritsema van Eck, J.R., 2001. Accessibility Measures: Review and Applications. Evaluation of Accessibility Impacts of Land-Use Transport Scenario's, and Related Social and Economic Impacts. Bilthoven: RIVM - National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (NL).
22. Handy, S.L. and Niemeier, D.A., 1997. Measuring accessibility: an exploration of issues and alternatives. Environment and Planning A, 29 (7), 1175-1194.
23. Hay, A.M., 1995. Concepts of equity, fairness and justice in geographical studies. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 20, 500-508.
24. Hine, J.P. and Mitchell, F., 2001. Better for everyone? Travel experiences and transport exclusion. Urban Studies - Special Issue on 'The Barrier Free City: Possibilities and Prospects', 38 (2), 319.
25. Khisty, C.J., 1996. Operationalizing concepts of equity for public project investments. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1559, 94-99.
26. Lee, D.H., et al., 2006. Equity based land-use and transportation problem. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 40 (1), 75-93.
27. Lucas, K., 2006. Providing transport for social inclusion within a framework for environmental justice in the UK. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 40 (10), 801-809.
28. Martens, K., 2006a. Basing transport planning on principles of social justice. Berkeley Planning Journal, 19, 1-17.
29. Martens, K., 2006b. Integrating Considerations of Equity, Fairness and Justice in the Israeli Cost-Benefit Analysis. Jerusalem: Ministry of Transport.
30. Martens, K., 2008. Justice in transport: applying Walzer's 'spheres of justice' to the transport sector. 88th annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington DC, USA.
31. McNally, M.G., 2000a. The activity-based approach. In: D. A. Hensher and K. J. Button, eds. Handbook of Transport Modelling. Oxford: Pergamon, 53-69.
32. McNally, M.G., 2000b. The four-step model. In: D. A. Hensher and K. J. Button, eds. Handbook of Transport Modelling. Oxford: Pergamon, 35-52.
33. Meng, Q. and Yang, H., 2002. Benefit distribution and equity in road network design. Transportation Research Part B - Methodological, 36 (1), 19-35.
34. Miller, D., 1999a. Principles of Social Justice. Cambridge/London: Harvard University Press.
35. Miller, H.J., 1999b. Measuring space-time accessibility benefits within transportation networks: basic theory and computational procedures. Geographical Analysis, 31, 187-212.
36. Mogridge, M.J.H., 1997. The self-defeating nature of urban road capacity policy: a review of theories, disputes and available evidence. Transport Policy, 4 (1), 5-23.
37. Murray, A.T. and Davis, R., 2001. Equity in regional service provision. Journal of Regional Science, 41 (4), 577-600.
38. Pilko, P., 2007. Where to Allocate Regional Growth to Enhance Mobility, Washington DC Study. 87th annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, DC.
39. Portugali, J., 1980. Distribution, allocation, social structure and spatial form: elements of planning theory. Progress in Planning, 14 (3), 227-310.
40. Pucher, J., 1981. Equity in transit finance: distribution of transit subsidy benefit and costs among income classes. Journal of the American Planning Association, 47, 387-407.
41. Pucher, J., 1982. Discrimination in mass transit. Journal of the American Planning Association, 48 (3), 315-326.
42. Rawls, J., 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43. Replogle, M.A., 2000. Evaluating transportation equity: making the most of current regional models with step microsimulation analysis. Paper presented May 2000.
44. Sadurski, W., 1985. Giving Desert Its Due: Social Justice and Legal Theory. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
45. Sheppard, E., 1995. Modeling and Predicting Aggregate Flows. In: S. Hanson, ed. The Geography of Urban Transportation. New York/London: The Guilford Press, 100-128.
46. Slavin, H. and J. Lam (2001) Step microsimulation for transportation and equity analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington DC.
47. Smith, D.M., 1994. Geography and Social Justice. Cambridge: Blackwell.
48. Social Exclusion Unit (UK), 2003. Making the connections: final report on transport and social exclusion. Available from: http://www.socialexclusionunit.gov.uk/publications/reports/pdfs/SEU-Transport_Main.pdf [Retrieved 18 Sep 2003].
49. USDOT-FHWA, 2000. Transportation and environmental justice case studies. Available from: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/ej2000.htm and http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/ejustice/case/index.htm [Retrieved 10 Apr 2007].
50. Vigar, G., 2002. The Politics of Mobility: Transport, the Environment and Public Policy. London: Spon Press.
51. Walzer, M., 1983. Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality. New York: Basic Books.