Using syntactic-based kernels for classifying temporal relations

Journal of Computer Science and Technology

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 68-80

  Abolghasem Mirroshandel, Seyed ^a   Ghassem Sani, Gholamreza ^a   Khayyamian, Mahdy ^a  

^a SHARIF UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

Author keywords

information retrieval; kernel function; support vector machines; temporal relation classification; text mining

Indexed keywords

DATA MINING; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES; SYNTACTICS; TEXT PROCESSING;

ACCURACY OF CLASSIFICATIONS; AUTOMATICALLY GENERATED; KERNEL FUNCTION; QUESTION ANSWERING; STATE-OF-THE-ART METHODS; SYNTACTIC FEATURES; TEMPORAL RELATION; TEXT MINING;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION);

EID: 79951485644     PISSN: 10009000     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11390-011-9416-7     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Mani I, Marc V, Wellner B, Lee C, Pustejovsky J. Machine learning of temporal relations. In Proc. ACL 2006, Sydney, Australia, Jul. 17-21, 2006, pp. 753-760.
2. Tatu M, Srikanth M. Experiments with reasoning for temporal relations between events. In Proc. Coling 2008, Manchester, UK, Aug. 18-22, 2008, pp. 857-864.
3. JF Allen 1984 Towards a general theory of action and time Artificial Intelligence 23 2 123 154 0567.68025 10.1016/0004-3702(84)90008-0 (Pubitemid 14646897)
4. Pustejovsky J, Hanks P, Sauri R, See A, Gaizauskas R, Setzer A, Radev D, Sundheim B, Day D, Ferro L, Lazo M. The TimeBank corpus. In Proc. Corpus Linguistics, Lancaster, UK, Mar. 28-31, 2003, pp. 647-656.
5. Chklovski T, Pantel P. Global path-based refinement of noisy graphs applied to verb semantics. In Proc. IJCNLP 2005, Jeju Island, Korea, Oct. 11-13, 2005, pp. 792-803.
6. Torisawa K. Acquiring inference rules with temporal constraints by using Japanese coordinated sentences and nounverb co-occurrences. In Proc. HLT NAACL 2006, Main conference, New York City, USA, Jun. 4-9, 2006, pp. 57-64.
7. Inui T, Inui K, Matsumoto Y. What kinds and amounts of causal knowledge can be acquired from text by using connective markers as clues? In Proc. 6th International Conference on Discovery Science, Sapporo, Japan, Oct. 17-19, 2003, pp. 180-193.
8. Zanaotto F M, Pennacchiotti M, Pazienza M T. Discovering asymmetric entailment relations between verbs using selectional preferences. In Proc. ACL 2006, Sydney, Australia, Jul. 17-21, 2006, pp. 849-856.
9. Chambers N, Wang S, Jurafsky D. Classifying temporal relations between events. In Proc. ACL 2007, Prague, Czech, Jun. 23-30, 2007, pp. 173-176.
10. Bethard S, Martin J H. Learning semantic links from a corpus of parallel temporal and causal relations. In Proc. ACL 2008, Columbus, USA, Jun. 15-20, 2008, pp. 177-180.
11. Bethard S, Corvey W, Klingenstein S, Martin J H. Building a corpus of temporal-causal structure. In Proc. Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC2008), Morroco, May 28-30, 2008, pp. 908-915.
12. S Bethard JH Martin S Klingenstein 2007 Finding temporal structure in text: Machine learning of syntactic temporal relations International Journal of Semantic Computing (IJSC) 1 4 441 457 10.1142/S1793351X07000238
13. M Lapata A Lascarides 2006 Learning sentence-internal temporal relations Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 27 85 117 1182.68176 (Pubitemid 44681374)
14. Bethard S, Martin J H, Klingenstein S. Timelines from text: Identification of syntactic temporal relations. In Proc. ICSC, Irvine, USA, Sept. 17-19, 2007, pp. 11-18.
15. Savova G, Bethard S, Styler W, Martin J H, Palmer M, Masanz J,Ward W. Towards temporal relation discovery from the clinical narrative. In Proc. American Medical Informatics Association, San Francisco, USA, Nov. 14-18, 2009, pp. 568-572.
16. Lapata, M. Lascarides A. Inferring sentence-internal temporal relations. In Proc. NAACL 2004, Boston, USA, May 2-7, pp. 153-160.
17. Bethard S, Martin J H. CU-TMP: Temporal relation classification using syntactic and semantic features. In Proc. SemEval 2007, Prague, Czech, Jun. 23-24, 2007, pp. 129-163.
18. Chambers N, Jurafsky D. Jointly combining implicit constraints improves temporal ordering. In Proc. EMNLP2008, Hawaii, USA, Oct. 25-27, 2008, pp. 698-706.
19. Puscasu G. Wvali: Temporal relation identification by syntactico-semantic analysis. In Proc. SemEval 2007, Prague, Czech, Jun. 23-24, pp. 484-487.
20. Bramsen P, Deshpande P, Lee Y K, Barzilay R. Inducing temporal graphs. In Proc. EMNLP2006, Sydney, Australia, Jul. 22-23, 2006, pp. 189-198.
21. Boguraev B, Ando K. Timeml-compliant text analysis for temporal reasoning. In Proc. IJCAI 2005, Edinburgh, UK, Jul. 30-Aug. 5, 2005, pp. 997-1003.
22. Bethard S. Finding event, temporal and causal structure in text: A machine learning approach [Ph.D. Dissertation]. University of Colorado at Boulder, 2007.
23. Mirroshandel S A, Khayyamian M, Ghassem-Sani G R. Using tree kernels for classifying temporal relations between events. In Proc. PACLIC 2009, Hong Kong, China, Dec. 3-5, 2009, pp. 355-364.
24. Mirroshandel S A, Khayyamian M, Ghassem-Sani G R. Event-time temporal relation classification using syntactic tree kernels. In Proc. The 4th Language and Technology Conference (LTC2009), Poznan, Poland, Nov. 6-8, 2009, pp. 300-304.
25. Abe S, Inui K, Matsumoto Y. Two-phased event relation acquisition coupling the relation-oriented and argument-oriented approaches. In Proc. Coling 2008, Manchester, UK, Aug. 18-22, 2008, pp. 1-8.
26. Harris Z. Mathematical Structure of Language. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1968.
27. Lin D, Pantel P. DIRT - Discovery of inference rules from text. In Proc. The 7th ACM SIGKDD, San Francisco, USA, Aug. 26-29, 2001, pp. 323-328.
28. Szpektor I, Tanev H, Dagan I. Scaling Web-based acquisition of entailment relations. In Proc. EMNLP2004, Barcelona, Spain, Jul. 25-26, 2004, pp. 41-48.
29. Pekar V. Acquisition of verb entailment from text. In Proc. HLT NAACL Main Conference, New York, USA, Jun. 4-9, 2006, pp. 49-56.
30. Torisawa K. Acquiring inference rules with temporal constraints by using Japanese coordinated sentences and noun-verb co-occurrences. In Proc. The Human Language Technology Conference of the NAACL, Main Conference, New York, New York, USA, Jun. 4-9, 2006, pp. 57-64.
31. Boser B E, Guyon I M, Vapnik V N. A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers. In Proc. COLT1992, Pittsburgh, USA, Jul. 27-29, 1992, pp. 144-152.
32. Cortes C, Vapnik V. Support-vector networks. In Proc. Conference of Machine Learning, Tahoe City, USA, Jul. 9-12, 1995, pp. 273-297.
33. Collins M, Duffy N. Convolution kernels for natural language. In Proc. NIPS 2001, Vancouver, Canada, Dec. 3-8, 2001, pp. 625-632.
34. Khayyamian M, Mirroshandel, S A, Abolhassani H. Syntactic tree-based relation extraction using a generalization of Collins and Duffy convolution tree kernel. In Proc. HLT NAACL, Boulder USA, May 31-Jun. 5, 2009, pp. 66-71.
35. Moschitti A. Syntactic kernels for natural language learning: The semantic role labeling case. In Proc. HLT NAACL, New York, USA, Jun. 4-9, 2006, pp. 97-100.
36. Zhang M, Zhang J, Su J, Zhou G D. A composite kernel to extract relations between entities with both flat and structured features. In Proc. ACL 2006, Sydney, Australia, Jul. 17-21, 2006, pp. 825-832.
37. Mani I, Wellner B, Verhagen M, Pustejovsky J. Three approaches to learning Tlinks in TimeML. Technical Report, CS-07-268, Brandeis University, Walthan, USA, 2007.
38. Chang C C, Lin C J. Libsvm: A library for support vector machines. 2001, http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/cjlin/libsvm.
39. The Stanford Natural Language Processing Group, http://nlp.stanford.edu/ software/index.shtml.