The Australian 'FORM' approach to guideline development: The quest for the perfect system

BMC Medical Research Methodology

Volumn 11, Issue , 2011, Pages

  Dahm, Philipp ^a   Djulbegovic, Benjamin ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUSTRALIA; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; REVIEW;

AUSTRALIA; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC;

EID: 79851513188     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712288     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-17     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Are guidelines following guidelines? The methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines in the peer-reviewed medical literature. TM Shaneyfelt MF Mayo-Smith J Rothwangl, JAMA 1999 281 20 1900 1905 10.1001/jama.281.20.1900 10349893 (Pubitemid 29242803)
2. The origins, evolution, and future of The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. M Starr I Chalmers M Clarke AD Oxman, Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2009 25 Suppl 1 182 195 10.1017/S026646230909062X 19534840
3. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. DL Sackett WM Rosenberg JA Gray RB Haynes WS Richardson, BMJ 1996 312 7023 71 72 8555924
4. Of studies, syntheses, synopses, summaries, and systems: the "5S" evolution of information services for evidence-based health care decisions. RB Haynes, ACP J Club 2006 145 3 8 17080967
5. AGREE II: Advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care. B Sibbald MC Brouwers ME Kho GP Browman JS Burgers F Cluzeau G Feder B Fervers ID Graham J Grimshaw SE Hanna P Littlejohns J Makarski L Zitzelsberger, J Clin Epidemiol
6. Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence. S West V King TS Carey KN Lohr N McKoy SF Sutton L Lux, Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ) 2002 47 1 11 11979732
7. Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: critical appraisal of existing approaches The GRADE Working Group. D Atkins M Eccles S Flottorp GH Guyatt D Henry S Hill A Liberati D O'Connell AD Oxman B Phillips H Schunemann TT Edejer GE Vist JW Williams Jr The GRADE Working Group, BMC Health Serv Res 2004 4 1 38 10.1186/1472-6963-4-38 15615589
8. FORM: An Australian method for formulating and grading recommendations in evidence-based clinical guidelines. S Hillier K Grimmer-Somers T Merlin P Middleton J Salisbury R Tooher A Weston, BMC Med Res Methodol
9. What is "quality of evidence" and why is it important to clinicians? GH Guyatt AD Oxman R Kunz GE Vist Y Falck-Ytter HJ Schunemann for the GRADE Working Group, BMJ 2008 336 7651 995 998 10.1136/bmj.39490.551019.BE 18456631 (Pubitemid 351656090)
10. Going from evidence to recommendations. GH Guyatt AD Oxman R Kunz Y Falck-Ytter GE Vist A Liberati HJ Schunemann for the GRADE Working Group, BMJ 2008 336 7652 1049 1051 10.1136/bmj.39493.646875.AE 18467413
11. An emerging consensus on grading recommendations? G Guyatt G Vist Y Falck-Ytter R Kunz N Magrini H Schunemann, ACP J Club 2006 144 1 8 A9 16388549
12. A critical appraisal of standard guidelines for grading levels of evidence. PC Gugiu MR Gugiu, Eval Health Prof 2010 33 3 233 255 10.1177/0163278710373980 20801972
13. Evidence-based medicine: a unified approach. DM Eddy, Health Aff (Millwood) 2005 24 1 9 17 10.1377/hlthaff.24.1.9 15647211 (Pubitemid 40173932)