Treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: A randomized multicenter trial comparing sacrospinous fixation with vaginal hysterectomy (SAVE U trial)

BMC Women's Health

Volumn 11, Issue , 2011, Pages

  Detollenaere, Renée J ^a,e   den Boon, Jan ^a   Stekelenburg, Jelle ^b   Alhafidh, Akeel H H ^c   Hakvoort, Robert A ^d   Vierhout, Mark E ^e   van Eijndhoven, Hugo W F ^a  

^a Isala klinieken Zwolle ^*  (Netherlands)

^b MEDICAL CENTER LEEUWARDEN   (Netherlands)

^c Dept of Obstetrics and Gynaecology   (Netherlands)

^d Department of Orthopaedic Surgery   (Netherlands)

^e RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; DEFECATORY DISTRESS INVENTORY AND INCONTINENCE IMPACT QUESTIONNAIRE; EUROQOL 5D; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTICENTER STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECURRENT DISEASE; REOPERATION; SACROSPINOUS FIXATION; SEXUAL FUNCTION; SHORT FORM 36; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; URINARY INCONTINENCE SEXUAL QUESTIONNAIRE; UROGENITAL DISTRESS INVENTORY; UTERUS PROLAPSE; UTERUS SURGERY; VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY; AGED; BACK; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; LIGAMENT; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; STATISTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VAGINA; WOMEN'S HEALTH;

AGED; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; HYSTERECTOMY, VAGINAL; LIGAMENTS; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; QUALITY OF LIFE; SACROCOCCYGEAL REGION; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UTERINE PROLAPSE; VAGINA; WOMEN'S HEALTH;

EID: 79851512703     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726874     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6874-11-4     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Slieker-ten Hove MC, Pool-Goudzwaard AL, Eijkemans MJ, Steegers-Theunissen RP, Burger CW, Vierhout ME. The prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse symptoms and signs and their relation with bladder and bowel disorders in a general female population. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2009, 20:1037-45. 10.1007/s00192-009-0902-1, 2721135, 19444368.
2. Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 1997, 89:501-6. 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00058-6, 9083302.
3. Altman D, Granath F, Cnattingius S, Falconer C. Hysterectomy and risk of stress-urinary-incontinence surgery: nationwide cohort study. Lancet 2007, 370:1494-9. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61635-3, 17964350.
4. Mant J, Painter R, Vessey M. Epidemiology of genital prolapse: observations from the Oxford Family Planning Association Study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997, 104:579-85. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb11536.x, 9166201.
5. Blandon RE, Bharucha AE, Melton LJ, Schleck CD, Babalola EO, Zinsmeister AR, Gebhart JB. Incidence of pelvic floor repair after hysterectomy: A population-based cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007, 197:664. 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.08.064, 2562278, 18060973.
6. Marchionni M, Bracco GL, Checcucci V, Carabaneanu A, Coccia EM, Mecacci F, Scarselli G. True incidence of vaginal vault prolapse. Thirteen years of experience. J Reprod Med 1999, 44:679-684.
7. Barrington JW, Edwards G. Posthysterectomy vault prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2000, 11:241-245. 10.1007/s001920070033, 11005477.
8. Dällenbach P, Kaelin-Gambirasio I, Jacob S, Dubuisson JB, Boulvain M. Incidence rate and risk factors for vaginal vault prolapse repair after hysterectomy. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2008, 19:1623-9.
9. Dällenbach P, Kaelin-Gambirasio I, Dubuisson JB, Boulvain M. Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse repair after hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 2007, 110:625-32.
10. Hefni M, El-Toukhy T, Bhaumik J, Katsimanis E. Sacrospinous cervicocolpopexy with uterine conservation for uterovaginal prolapse in elderly women: an evolving concept. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003, 188:645-50. 10.1067/mob.2003.75, 12634635.
11. Morgan DM, Rogers MA, Huebner M, Wei JT, Delancy JO. Heterogeneity in anatomic outcome of sacrospinous ligament fixation for prolapse: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2007, 109:1424-33. 10.1097/01.AOG.0000264066.89094.21, 17540817.
12. Diwan A, Rardin CR, Kohli N. Uterine preservation during surgery for uterovaginal prolapse: a review. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2004, 15:286-92.
13. Dietz V, de Jong J, Huisman M, Schraffordt Koops S, Heintz P, van der Vaart CH. The effectiveness of the sacrospinous hysteropexy for the primary treatment of uterovaginal prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2007, 18:1271-6. 10.1007/s00192-007-0336-6, 17384894.
14. Dietz V, Huisman M, de Jong J, Heintz P, van der Vaart CH. Functional outcome after sacrospinous hysteropexy for uterine descensus. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2008, 19:747-52. 10.1007/s00192-007-0520-8, 2335287, 18297228.
15. Maher CF, Cary MP, Slack MC, Murray CJ, Milligan M, Schluter P. Uterine preservation or hysterectomy at sacrospinous colpopexy for uterovaginal prolapse?. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2001, 12:381-385. 10.1007/s001920170017, 11795641.
16. Brummen HJ, van de Pol G, Aalders CIM, Heintz APM, van der Vaart. Sacrospinous hysteropexy compared to vaginal hysterectomy as primary surgical treatment for a descensus uteri: effect on urinary symptoms. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2003, 14:350-355. 10.1007/s00192-003-1084-x, 14618315.
17. Hefni MA, El-Toukhy TA. Long-term outcome of vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for marked uterovaginal and vault prolapse. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2006, 127:257-263. 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.11.028, 16377061.
18. Dietz V, van der Vaart CH, van der Graaf Y, Heintz P, Schraffordt Koops SE. One-year follow-up after sacrospinous hysteropexy and vaginal hysterectomy for uterine descent: a randomized study. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2010, 21:209-16. 10.1007/s00192-009-1014-7, 2808513, 19834635.
19. Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JO, Klarskov P, Shull BL, Smith AR. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996, 175:10-7. 10.1016/S0002-9378(96)70243-0, 8694033.
20. Hall AF, Theofrastous JP, Cundiff GW, Harris RL, Hamilton LF, Swift SE, Bump RC. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the proposed International Continence Society, Society of Gynecologic Surgeons, and American Urogynecologic Society pelvic organ prolapse classification system. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996, 175:1467-70. 10.1016/S0002-9378(96)70091-1, 8987926.
21. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD. SF-36 physical and mental component summary measures-a users' manual 1994, Boston: New England Medical Center, The Health Institute.
22. van der Zee KI, Sanderman R. Het meten van de gezondheidstoestand met de Rand-36, een handleiding 1993, Groningen: Noordelijk centrum voor gezondheidsvraagstukken.
23. van der Vaart CH, de Leeuw JR, Roovers JP, Heintz AP. Measuring health-related quality of life in women with urogenital dysfunction: the urogenital distress inventory and incontinence impact questionnaire revisited. Neurourol Urodyn 2003, 22:97-104. 10.1002/nau.10038, 12579625.
24. Roovers JP, van der Bom JG, van der Vaart CH, Heintz AP. Prediction of findings at defecography in patients with genital prolapse. BJOG 2005, 112:1547-1553. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00734.x, 16225577.
25. Dolan P. Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care 1997, 35:1095-1108. 10.1097/00005650-199711000-00002, 9366889.
26. Lamers LM, Stalmeier PF, McDonnell J, Krabbe PF, van Busschbach JJ. Measuring the quality of life in economic evaluations: the Dutch EQ-5D tariff. NTVG 2005, 149:1574-8.
27. Espuña Pons M. Sexual health in women with pelvic floor disorders: measuring the sexual activity and function with questionnaires - a summary. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2009, 20:S65-S71.
28. Schweitzer KJ, de Jong M, Milani AL. Prolaps en seks: hoe meten we de relatie?. NTOG 2008, 121:79-82.
29. Vroege JA. De vragenlijst voor het signaleren van seksuele dysfuncties (VSD). Bruikbaarheid in de klinische praktijk 2003, Delft.
30. Kluivers KB, Hendriks JC, Mol BW, Bongers MY, Vierhout ME, Brölmann HA, de Vet HC. Clinimetric properties of 3 instruments measuring postoperative recovery in a gynecologic surgical population. Surgery 2008, 144:12-21. 10.1016/j.surg.2008.03.027, 18571580.