A magnetic resonance spectroscopy driven initialization scheme for active shape model based prostate segmentation

Medical Image Analysis

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 214-225

  Toth, Robert ^a   Tiwari, Pallavi ^a   Rosen, Mark ^b   Reed, Galen ^c   Kurhanewicz, John ^c   Kalyanpur, Arjun ^d   Pungavkar, Sona ^e   Madabhushi, Anant ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d Teleradiology Solutions Pvt Ltd India   (India)

^e DR BALABHAI NANAVATI HOSPITAL   (India)

Author keywords

Active shape models (ASMs); In vivo MRI; Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS); Prostate segmentation; Spectral clustering

Indexed keywords

ACTIVE SHAPE MODELS; ANATOMICAL MODELS; AUTOMATED IDENTIFICATION; BIOMEDICAL IMAGERY; CLINICAL IMAGES; CLUSTERING SCHEME; HIGHLY-CORRELATED; IMAGE INTENSITY INFORMATION; IN VIVO MRI; IN-VIVO; INITIALIZATION METHODS; MANUAL SEGMENTATION; MODEL INITIALIZATION; MR IMAGES; MR SPECTROSCOPY; MULTIPROTOCOLS; POST TREATMENT; PRIMARY CONTRIBUTION; PROSTATE CANCERS; PROSTATE SEGMENTATION; PROSTATE VOLUME; QUANTITATIVE COMPARISON; READER VARIABILITY; SEGMENTATION METHODS; SEGMENTATION PERFORMANCE; SEGMENTATION RESULTS; SPATIAL LOCATION; SPECTRAL CLUSTERING; SPECTRAL SIGNAL; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STRUCTURAL IMAGING; TEXTURE FEATURES; TRUE POSITIVE;

DISEASES; EDGE DETECTION; FACE RECOGNITION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; SIGNAL DETECTION; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

IMAGE SEGMENTATION;

ANATOMICAL VARIATION; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IN VIVO STUDY; LABORATORY AUTOMATION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATE SEGMENTATION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ALGORITHMS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; PROSTATE; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 79851508419     PISSN: 13618415     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2010.09.002     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Barqawi, A.B., Lu, L., Crawford, E.D., Fenster, A., Werahera, P.N., Kumar, D., Miller, S., Suri, J.S., 2007. Three different strategies for real-time prostate capsule volume computation from 3-D end-fire transrectal ultrasound. In: Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. pp. 816-818.
2. Betrouni N., Dewalle A.S., Puech P., Vermandel M., Rousseau J. 3D delineation of prostate, rectum and bladder on MR images. Computer Mediated Imaging and Graphics 2008, 32(7):622-630.
3. Brejl M., Sonka M. Object localization and border detection criteria design in edge-based image segmentation: automated learning from examples. IEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 2000, 19(10):973-985.
4. Catalona W. Measurement of prostate-specific antigen in serum as a screening test for prostate cancer. New England Journal of Medicine 1991, 324(17):1156-1161.
5. Chan I., William Wells I., Mulkern Robert V., Haker Steven, Zhang Jianqing, Zou Kelly H., Maier Stephan E., Tempany Clare M.C. Detection of prostate cancer by integration of line-scan diffusion, T2-mapping and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging; a multichannel statistical classifier. Medical Physics 2003, 30(9):2390-2398.
6. Chen T., Kim S., Goyal S., Jabbour S., Zhoy J., Rajagopal G., Haffty B., Yue N. Object-constrained meshless deformable algorithm for high speed 3d nonrigid registration between CT and CBCT. Medical Physics 2010, 37(1):197-210.
7. Chiu B., Freeman G.H., Salama M.M.A., Fenster A. Prostate segmentation algorithm using dyadic wavelet transform and discrete dynamic contour. Physics of Medical Biology 2004, 49(21):4943-4960.
8. Coakley F.V., Qayyum A., Kurhanewicz J. Magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopic imaging of prostate cancer. Journal of Urology 2003, 170(6):S69-S76.
9. Comaniciu D., Meer P. Mean shift: A robust approach toward feature space analysis. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 2002, 24(5):603-619.
10. Cootes, T.F., Taylor, C.J., 1994. Using grey-level models to improve active shape model search. 1994. In: Conference A: Computer Vision and Image Processing, Proceedings of the 12th IAPR International Conference on Pattern Recognition, vol. 1. pp. 63-67.
11. Cootes, T.F., Taylor, C.J., 2004. Statistical models of appearance for computer vision.
12. Cootes, T.F., Hill, A., Taylor, C.J., Haslam, J.. 1993. The use of active shape models for locating structures in medical images. In: IPMI. pp. 33-47.
13. Cootes T.F., Taylor C.J., Lanitis A. Multi-resolution search with active shape models. Computer Vision and Image Processing 1994, 1:610-612.
14. Cootes T.F., Taylor C.J., Cooper D.H., Graham J. Active shape models - their training and application. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 1995, 61(1):38-59.
15. Cosio F.A. Automatic initialization of an active shape model of the prostate. Medical Image Analysis 2008, 12(4):469-483.
16. Costa, J., Delingette, H., Novellas, S., Ayache, N., 2007. Automatic segmentation of bladder and prostate using coupled 3D deformable models. In: MICCAI. pp. 252-260.
17. de Bruijne M., Ginneken Bram van, Viergever M.A., Niessen W.J. Adapting Active Shape Models for 3D Segmentation of Tubular Structures in Medical Images 2003, vol. 2732. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp. 136-147.
18. Duda, R.O., Hart, P.E., Stork, D.G., 2001. Pattern Classification, second ed. Wiley-Interscience.
19. Flores-Tapia, D., Thomas, G., Venugopal, N., McCurdy, B., Pistorius, S., 2008. Semi automatic MRI prostate segmentation based on wavelet multiscale products. In: Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. pp. 3020-3023.
20. Gao Y., Sandhu R., Fichtinger G., Tannenbaum A. A coupled global registration and segmentation framework with application to magnetic resonance prostate imagery. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 2010.
21. Gong L., Pathak S.D., Haynor D.R., Cho P.S., Kim Y. Parametric shape modeling using deformable superellipses for prostate segmentation. IEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 2004, 23(3):340-349.
22. Hastie T., Tibshirani R., Friedman J. The Elements of Statistical Learning 2009, Springer.
23. Hoffelt S.C., Marshall L.M., Garzotto M., Hung A., Holland J., Beer T.M. A comparison of CT scan to transrectal ultrasound measured prostate volume in untreated prostate cancer. International Journal of Radiation Oncology and Biological Physics 2003, 57(1):29-32.
24. Hom J.J., Coakley F.V., Simko J.P., Lu Y., Qayyum A., Westphalen A.C.A., Schmitt L.D., Carroll P.R., Kurhanewicz J. High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in patients with prostate cancer: MR and MR spectroscopic imaging features - initial experience. Radiology 2006, 242(2):483-489.
25. Hu Ning, Downey Dónal B., Fenster Aaron, Ladak Hanif M. Prostate boundary segmentation from 3D ultrasound images. Medical Physics 2003, 30(7):1648-1659.
26. Kaminski J.M., Hanlon A.L., Horwitz E.M., Pinover W.H., Mitra R.K., Hanks G.E. Relationship between prostate volume, prostate-specific antigen nadir, and biochemical control. International Journal of Radiation Oncology and Biological Physics 2002, 52(4):888-892.
27. Kim H., Buckley D.L., Peterson D.M., Duensing G.R., Caserta J., Fitzsimmons J., Blackband S.J. In vivo prostate magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopy at 3Tesla using a transceive pelvic phased array coil: preliminary results. Investigative Radiology 2003, 38(7):443-451.
28. Klein S., van der Heide U.A., Lips I.M., van Vulpen M., Staring M., Pluim J.P.W. Automatic segmentation of the prostate in 3D MR images by Atlas matching using localized mutual information. Medical Physics 2008, 35(4):1407-1417.
29. Kumar R., Nayyar R., Kumar V., Gupta N.P., Hemal A.K., Jagannathan N.R., Dattagupta S., Thulkar S. Potential of magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging in predicting absence of prostate cancer in men with serum prostate-specific antigen between 4 and 10ng/ml: a follow-up study. Technology and Engineering 2008, 72(4):859-863.
30. Kurhanewicz J., Vigneron D.B., Hricak H., Narayan P., Carroll P., Nelson S.J. Three-dimensional h-1 MR spectroscopic imaging of the in situ human prostate with high (0.24-0.7cm3) spatial resolution. Radiology 1996, 198(3):795-805.
31. Kurhanewicz J., Swanson M.G., Nelson S.J., Vigneron D.B. Combined magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopic imaging approach to molecular imaging of prostate cancer. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2002, 16(4):451-463.
32. Ladak H.M., Mao Y., ad Wang F., Downey D.B., Steinman D.A., Fenster A. Prostate boundary segmentation from 2D ultrasound images. Medical Physics 2000, 27(8):1777-1788.
33. Ledoit O., Wolf M. A well-conditioned estimator for large-dimensional covariance matrices. Journal of Multivariate Analysis 2004, 88(2).
34. Liu,X. Langer, D.L., Haider, M.A., Van der Kwast, T.H., Evans, A.J., Wernick, M.N., Yetik, I.S., 2009. Unsupervised segmentation of the prostate using MR images based on level set with a shape prior. In: Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc., vol. 1. pp. 3613-3616.
35. Madabhushi A., Udupa J.K. Interplay between intensity standardization and inhomogeneity correction in MR image processing. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 2005, 24(5):561-576.
36. Madabhushi A., Udupa J.K. New methods of MR image intensity standardization via generalized scale. Medical Physics 2006, 33(9):3426-3434.
37. Madabhushi A., Feldman M.D., Metaxas D.N., Tomaszeweski J., Chute D. Automated detection of prostatic adenocarcinoma from high-resolution ex vivo MRI. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaginag 2005, 24(12):1611-1625.
38. Madabhushi A., Udupa J.K., Souza A. Generalized scale: theory, algorithms, and application to image inhomogeneity correction. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 2006, 101(2):100-121.
39. Makni, N., Puech, P., Lopes, R., Viard, R., Colot, O., Betrouni, N., 2008. Automatic 3D segmentation of prostate in MRI combining a priori knowledge, Markov fields and Bayesian framework. In: Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. pp. 2992-2995.
40. Mitchell S.C., Bosch J.G., Lelieveldt B.P.F., van der Geest R.J., Reiber J.H.C., Sonka M. 3-D active appearance models: segmentation of cardiac MR and ultrasound images. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 2002, 21(9):1167-1178.
41. Mitechel M. An Introduction to Genetic Algorithms 1998, MIT Press.
42. Montagnat J., Delingette H. Volumetric Medical Images Segmentation Using Shape Constrained Deformable Models 1997, vol. 1205. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp. 13-22.
43. MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging of prostate cancer prior to radical prostatectomy: a prospective multi-institutional clinicopathological study. http://www.acrin.org/Portals/0/Protocols/6659/A6659partial_summary.pdf.
44. Nathan M.S., Seenivasagam K., Mei Q., Wickham J.E.A., Miller R.A. Transrectal ultrasonography: why are estimates of prostate volume and dimension so inaccurate?, 1996, vol. 77(3). Blackwell Science Ltd., pp. 401-407.
45. Pathak S.D., Chalana V., Haynor D.R., Kim Y. Edge-guided boundary delineation in prostate ultrasound images. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 2000, 19(12):1211-1219.
46. Seghers D., Loeckx D., Maes F., Vandermeulen D., Suetens P. Minimal shape and intensity cost path segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 2007, 26(8):1115-1129.
47. Smyth P.P., Taylor C.J., Adams J.E. Automatic measurement of vertebral shape using active shape models. Image and Vision Computing 1997, 15(8):575-581.
48. Testa C., Schiavina R., Lodi R., Salizzoni E., Corti B., Farsad M., Kurhanewicz J., Manferrari F., Brunocilla E., Tonon C., Monetti N., Castellucci P., Fanti S., Coe M., Grigioni W.F., Martorana G., Canini R., Barbiroli B. Prostate cancer: sextant localization with MR imaging, MR spectroscopy, and 11c-choline PET/CT claudia testa. Radiology 2007, 244:797-806.
49. Tiwari, P., Madabhushi, A., Rosen, M., 2007. A hierarchical unsupervised spectral clustering scheme for detection of prostate cancer from magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). In: MICCAI. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. pp. 278-286.
50. Tiwari, P., Rosen, M., Madabhushi, A., 2008. Consensus-locally linear embedding (C-LLE): application to prostate cancer detection on magnetic resonance spectroscopy. In: MICCAI. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2. pp. 330-338.
51. Tiwari P., Rosen M., Madabhushi A. A hierarchical spectral clustering and non-linear dimensionality reduction scheme for detection of prostate cancer from magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Medical Physics 2009, 36(9):3927-3939.
52. Toth, R., Chappelow, J., Rosen, M., Pungavkar, S., Kalyanpur, A., Madabhushi, A., 2008. Multi-attribute, non-initializing, texture reconstruction based ASM (MANTRA). In: MICCAI. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1. pp. 653-661.
53. Toth, R., Doyle, S., Pungavkar, S., Kalyanpur, A., Madabhushi, A., 2009. Weritas: Weighted ensemble of regional image textures for asm segmentation. In: SPIE Medical Imaging, vol. 7260.
54. van Ginneken B., Frangi A.F., Staal J.J., Romeny B., Viergever M.A. Active shape model segmentation with optimal features. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 2002, 21(8):924-933.
55. Vilanova J.C., Barcelo J. Prostate cancer detection: magnetic resonance (MR) spectroscopic imaging. Abdominal Imaging 2007, 253-262.
56. Wang W., Shan S., Gao W., Cao B., Yin B. An improved active shape model for face alignment. Multimodal Interfaces 2002, 523-528.
57. Warfield S.K., Zou K.H., Wells W.M. Validation of Image Segmentation and Expert Quality with an Expectation-Maximization Algorithm 2002, vol. 2488. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 298-306.
58. Warfield S.K., Zou K.H., Wells W.M. Simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (staple): an algorithm for the validation of image segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 2004, 23(7):903-921.
59. Zaider M., Zelefsk M.J., Lee E.K., Zakian K.L., Amols H.I., Dyke J., Cohen G., Hu Y., Endi A.K., Chui C., Koutcher J.A. Treatment planning for prostate implants using magnetic-resonance spectroscopy imaging. International Journal of Radiation Oncology and Biological Physics 2000, 47(2):1085-1096.
60. Zhou J., Kim S., Jabbour S., Goyal S., Haffty B., Chen T., Levinson L., Metaxas D., Yue N.J. A 3D global-to-local deformable mesh model based registration and anatomy-constrained segmentation method for image guided prostate radiotherapy. Medical Physics 2010, 37(3):1298-1308.
61. Zhu, Y., Zwiggelaar, R., Williams, S., 2003. Prostate segmentation: a comparative study. Medical Image Understanding and Analysis. 129-132.
62. Zhu Yanong, Fisher Mark, Zwiggelaar Reyer Improving asm search using mixture models for grey-level profiles. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2005, vol. 3522:292-299. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg. J.S. Marques, N.P. de la Blanca, P. Pina (Eds.).
63. Zwiggelaar, R., Zhu, Y., Williams, S., 2003. Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis. Semi-automatic Segmentation of the Prostate, pp. 1108-1116.