Teneral matings in fruit flies: Male coercion and female response

Animal Behaviour

Volumn 81, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 595-601

  Seeley, Corrine ^a   Dukas, Reuven ^a  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Drosophila melanogaster; Forced copulation; Fruit fly; Mate choice; Sexual conflict; Sexual selection

Indexed keywords

COPULATION; DIVERGENCE; FEMALE; FLY; MALE; MATE CHOICE; MATURATION; SEXUAL CONFLICT; SEXUAL SELECTION;

DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER;

EID: 79851508221     PISSN: 00033472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.12.003     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Arnqvist G., Rowe L. Sexual Conflict 2005, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
2. Clutton-Brock T.H., Parker G.A. Sexual coercion in animal societies. Animal Behaviour 1995, 49:1345-1365.
3. Coyne J.A., Orr H.A. Speciation 2004, Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
4. Crudgington H.S., Siva-Jothy M.T. Genital damage, kicking and early death. Nature 2000, 407:855-856.
5. Dukas R. Causes and consequences of male-male courtship in fruit flies. Animal Behaviour 2010, 80:913-919.
6. Eberhard W.G. Female Control: Sexual Selection by Cryptic Female Choice 1996, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
7. Fricke C., Bretman A., Chapman T. Sexual conflict. Evolutionary Behavioral Ecology 2010, 400-415. Oxford University Press, Oxford. D.F. Westneat, C.W. Fox (Eds.).
8. Gromko M.H., Gilbert D.G., Richmond R.C. Sperm transfer and use in the multiple mating system of Drosophila. Sperm Competition and the Evolution of Animal Mating Systems 1984, 371-425. Academic Press, Orlando, Florida. R.L. Smith (Ed.).
9. Hardeland R. Species differences in the diurnal rhythmicity of courtship behaviour within the melanogaster group of the genus Drosophila. Animal Behaviour 1972, 20:170-174.
10. Jagadeeshan S., Singh R.S. A time-sequence functional analysis of mating behaviour and genital coupling in Drosophila: role of cryptic female choice and male sex-drive in the evolution of male genitalia. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 2006, 19:1058-1070.
11. Krebs R.A. Function and genetics of long versus short copulations in the cactophilic fruit fly, Drosophila mojavensis (Diptera: Drosophilidae). Journal of Insect Behavior 1991, 4:221-233.
12. McKinney F., Derrickson S.R., Mineau P. Forced copulation in waterfowl. Behaviour 1983, 86:250-294.
13. Mallet J. What does Drosophila genetics tell us about speciation?. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 2006, 21:386-393.
14. Manning A. The control of sexual receptivity in female Drosophila. Animal Behaviour 1967, 15:239-250.
15. Markow T.A. Forced matings in natural populations of Drosophila. American Naturalist 2000, 156:100-103.
16. Moshitzky P., Fleischmann I., Chaimov N., Saudan P., Klauser S., Kubli E., Applebaum S.W. Sex-peptide activates juvenile hormone biosynthesis in the Drosophila melanogaster corpus allatum. Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology 1996, 32:363-374.
17. Noor M.A.F., Feder J.L. Speciation genetics: evolving approaches. Nature Reviews Genetics 2006, 7:851-861.
18. Pitnick S., Hosken D.J. Postcopulatory sexual selection. Evolutionary Behavioral Ecology 2010, 379-399. Oxford University Press, Oxford. D.F. Westneat, C.W. Fox (Eds.).
19. Price C.S.C., Dyer K.A., Coyne J.A. Sperm competition between Drosophila males involves both displacement and incapacitation. Nature 1999, 400:449-452.
20. Ram K.R., Wolfner M.F. A network of interactions among seminal proteins underlies the long-term postmating response in Drosophila. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 2009, 106:15384-15389.
21. Ritchie M. Sexual selection and speciation. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 2007, 38:79-102.
22. Rundle H.D., Boughman J.W. Behavioral ecology and speciation. Evolutionary Behavioral Ecology 2010, 471-487. Oxford University Press, Oxford. D.F. Westneat, C.W. Fox (Eds.).
23. Snook R.R., Hosken D.J. Sperm death and dumping in Drosophila. Nature 2004, 428:939-941.
24. Spieth H.T., Ringo J.M. Mating behavior and sexual isolation in Drosophila. The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila 1983, 345-384. Academic Press, London. M. Ashburner, H.L. Carson, J.N. Thompson (Eds.).
25. Thornhill R. Rape in Panorpa scorpionflies and a general rape hypothesis. Animal Behaviour 1980, 28:52-59.
26. Thornhill R. Alternative hypotheses for traits believed to have evolved by sperm competition. Sperm Competition and the Evolution of Animal Mating Systems 1984, 151-178. Academic Press, Orlando, Florida. R.L. Smith (Ed.).
27. Thornhill R., Alcock J. The Evolution of Insect Mating Systems 1983, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
28. Thornhill R., Palmer C. A Natural History of Rape: Biological Bases of Sexual Coercion 2000, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.