Belief rough set classification for web mining based on dynamic core

Proceedings of the 2010 10th International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications, ISDA'10

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 403-408

  Trabelsi, Salsabil ^a   Elouedi, Zied ^a   Lingras, Pawan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE TUNIS   (Tunisia)

^b SAINT MARY S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BELIEF FUNCTION; BELIEF FUNCTION THEORY; BELONG TO; CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM; DATA SETS; DECISION ATTRIBUTE; DECISION RULES; EVALUATION CRITERIA; FEATURE SELECTION; LARGE DATABASE; ON DYNAMICS; ROUGH SET; ROUGH SET CLASSIFICATION; TIME REQUIREMENTS; TRANSFERABLE BELIEF MODEL; UNCERTAIN DATAS; WEB MINING; WEB USAGE; WEB USAGE MINING;

CLASSIFIERS; DECISION TREES; FEATURE EXTRACTION; INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS; ROUGH SET THEORY; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

DATA MINING;

EID: 79851498013     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ISDA.2010.5687230     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Elouedi, Z., Mellouli, K., Smets, P.: Belief decision trees: Theoretical foundations. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, Vol 28(2-3), 91124 (2001)
2. Elouedi, Z., Mellouli, K. and Smets, P.: Assessing sensor reliability for multisensor data fusion within the transferable belief model. IEEE Trans Syst Man cyben, Vol 34(1), (2004) 782-787.
3. Fixen, D. and Mahler, R.P.S.: The modified Dempster-Shafer approach to classification, IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern. Vol 27(1), (1997) 96-104. (Pubitemid 127770693)
4. Jousseleme, A.L., Grenier, D. and Bosse, E.: A new distance between two bodies of evidence. Information Fusion. Vol 2(2), (2001) 91-101. (Pubitemid 33632552)
5. Lingras, P. and West, C.: Interval Set Clustering of Web Users with Rough K-means, Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, Vol 23(1), 2004(5-16).
6. Maheswari, V. U., Siromoney, A. and Mehata, K. M.: The variable precision rough set model for web usage mining, Proc. 1st Asia-Pacific Conf. Web Intell. WI-2001, Maebashi, Japan, Oct. 2001.
7. Murphy, C.K.: Combining belief functions when evidence conflits, Decision Support Systems 29, (2000) 1-9.
8. Pawlak, Z.: Rough Sets. International journal of computer and information sciences, Vol 11(5), (1982) 341-356.
9. Pawlak, Z.: Rough Sets: Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning About Data. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishing, 1991.
10. Shafer, G.: A mathematical theory of evidence. Princeton University Press. Princeton, NJ, 1976.
11. Smets, P. and Kennes, R.: The transferable belief model. Artificial Intelligence, Vol 66 (2), (1994) 191-234.
12. Smets, P.: The transferable belief model for quantified belief representation. In D.M. Gabbay & P. Smets (Eds), Handbook of defeasible reasoning and uncertainty management systems, Vol 1, Doordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer, (1998) 267-301.
13. Smets, P.: Application of the transferable belief model to diagnostic problems. International journal of intelligent systems, Vol 13 (2-3), (1998) 127-157. (Pubitemid 128591038)
14. Trabelsi, S. and Elouedi, Z.: Learning decision rules from uncertain data using rough sets, The 8th International FLINS Conference on Computational Intelligence in Decision and Control, Madrid, Spain, September 21-24, World scientific, (2008) 114-119.
15. Trabelsi, S., Elouedi, Z. and Lingras, P.: Dynamic reduct from partially uncertain data using rough sets, RSFDGrC 2009, LNAI 5908, (2009) 160-167.
16. Trabelsi, S., Elouedi, Z. and Lingras, P.: Belief rough set classifier, Canadian AI 2009, LNAI 5549, (2009) 257-261.
17. Zouhal, L.M and Denoeux, T.: An evidence-theory k-NN rule with parameter optimization, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Vol 28(2), (1998) 263-271. (Pubitemid 128748625)