Allometric and non-allometric consequences of inbreeding on Drosophila melanogaster wings

Biological Journal of the Linnean Society

Volumn 102, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 626-634

  Trotta, Vincenzo ^a   Cavicchi, Sandro ^a   Guerra, Daniela ^a   Andersen, Ditte H ^b   Babbitt, Gregory A ^c   Kristensen, Torsten N ^b   Pedersen, Kamilla S ^b   Loeschcke, Volker ^b   Pertoldi, Cino ^b,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^b AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^c ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d MAMMAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Poland)

Author keywords

Allometry; Wing shape

Indexed keywords

ALLOMETRY; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; FLY; INBREEDING AVOIDANCE; LABORATORY METHOD; POPULATION SIZE; SAMPLING; WING MORPHOLOGY;

DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER;

EID: 79851497858     PISSN: 00244066     EISSN: 10958312     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2010.01588.x     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Arnqvist G, Martensson T. 1998. Measurement error in geometric morphometrics: empirical strategies to assess and reduce its impact on measures of shape. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scentiarum Hungaricae 44: 73-96.
2. Baena-López LA, Baonza A, García-Bellido A. 2005. The orientation of cell divisions determines the shape of Drosophila organs. Current Biology 15: 1640-1644.
3. Baylac M, Penin X. 1998. Wing static allometry in Drosophila simulans males (Diptera, Drosophilidae) and its relationships with developmental compartments. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scentiarum Hungaricae 44: 97-112.
4. Biehs B, Sturtevant MA, Bier E. 1998. Boundaries in the Drosophila wing imaginal discs organize vein-specific genetic programs. Development 125: 4245-4257.
5. Birdsall K, Zimmerman E, Teeter K, Gibson G. 2000. Genetic variation for the positioning of wing veins in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution and Development 2: 16-24.
6. Bitner-Mathé BC, Klaczko LB. 1999. Size and shape heritability in natural populations of Drosophila mediopunctata: temporal and microgeographical variation. Genetica 105: 35-42.
7. Bitner-Mathé B, Peixoto AA, Klaczko LB. 1995. Morphological variation in a natural population of Drosophila mediopunctata: altitudinal cline, temporal changes and influence of chromosome inversions. Heredity 75: 54-61.
8. Bookstein FL. 1991. Morphometric tools for landmark data: geometry and biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Bookstein FL. 1996. Biometrics, biomathematics and the morphometric synthesis. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 58: 313-365.
10. Calboli FCF, Gilchrist GW, Partridge L. 2003. Different cell size and cell number contribution in two newly established and one ancient body size cline of Drosophila subobscura. Evolution 57: 566-573.
11. Calder WA. 1984. Size, function, and life history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Cavicchi S, Pezzoli MC, Giorgi G. 1981. Correlation between characters as related to developmental pattern in Drosophila. Genetica 56: 189-195.
13. Cavicchi S, Guerra D, Giorgi G, Pezzoli MC. 1985. Temperature-related divergence in experimental populations of Drosophila melanogaster. I. Genetic and developmental basis of wing size and shape variation. Genetics 109: 65-689.
14. Cavicchi S, Giorgi G, Natali V, Guerra D. 1991. Temperature-related divergence in experimental populations of Drosophila melanogaster. III. Fourier and centroid analysis of wing shape and relationship between shape variation and fitness. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 4: 141-159.
15. de Celis JF. 2003. Pattern formation in the Drosophila wing: the development of the veins. Bioassays 25: 443-451.
16. David JR, Bocquet C, De Scheemaeker-Louis M. 1977. Genetic latitudinal adaptation of Drosophila melanogaster: new discriminative biometrical traits between European and equatorial African populations. Genetics Research 30: 247-255.
17. David JR, Gibert P, Pétavy G, Capy P, Moreteau B. 2005. Isofemale lines in Drosophila: an empirical approach to quantitative trait analysis in natural populations. Heredity 94: 3-12.
18. David JR, Araripe LO, Bitner-Mathé BC, Capy P, Goñi B, Klaczko LB, Legout H, Martins MB, Vouidibio J, Yassin A, Moreteau B. 2006. Quantitative trait analysis and geographic variability of natural populations of Zaprionus indianus, a recent inveder in Brazil. Heredity 96: 53-62.
19. De Moed GH, De Jong G, Scharloo W. 1997. The phenotypic plasticity of wing size in Drosophila melanogaster: the cellular basis of its genetic variation. Heredity 79: 260-267.
20. Dryden IL, Mardia KV. 1998. Statistical shape analysis. Chichester: Wiley.
21. Dworkin I, Gibson G. 2006. Epidermal growth factor receptor and transforming growth factor- signaling contributes to variation for wing shape in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 173: 1417-1431.
22. Dworkin I, Palsson A, Gibson G. 2005. Replication of an Egfr-wing shape association in a wild-caught cohort of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 169: 2115-2125.
23. Falconer DS, Mackay TFC. 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics, 4th edn. Harlow: Longmans Green.
24. Gibert P, Capy P, Imasheva A, Moreteau B, Morin JP, Petavy G, David JR. 2004. Comparative analysis of morphological traits among Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans: genetic variability, clines and phenotypic plasticity. Genetica 120: 165-179.
25. Gilchrist AS, Azevedo RBR, Partridge L, O'Higgins P. 2000. Adaptation and constrain in the evolution of Drosophila melanogaster wing shape. Evolution and Development 2: 114-124.
26. Gilchrist GW, Huey RB, Serra L. 2001. Rapid evolution of wing size clines in Drosophila subobscura. Genetica 112: 273-286.
27. Gilchrist AS, Partridge L. 2001. The contrasting genetic architecture of wing size and shape in Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity 86: 144-152.
28. Gonzales-Gaitan M, Capdevilla MP, Garcia-Bellido A.1994.Cell proliferation patterns in the wing imaginal disc of Drosophila. Mechanisms of Development 40: 183-200.
29. Guerra D, Pezzoli MC, Giorgi G, Garoia F, Cavicchi S. 1997. Developmental constraints in the Drosophila wings. Heredity 79: 564-571.
30. Haldane JBS. 1955. The measurement of variation. Evolution 9: 484.
31. Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD. 2001. PAST: paleontological statistic software package for education and data analysis. Paleontologia Electronica 4: 9.
32. Huey RB, Gilchrist GW, Carlson ML, Berrigan D, Serra L. 2000. Rapid evolution of a geographical cline in size in an introduced fly. Science 287: 308-309.
33. James AC, Azevedo RBR, Partridge L. 1997. Genetic and environmental responses to temperature of Drosophila melanogaster from a latitudinal cline. Genetics 146: 881-890.
34. Joubert D, Bijlsma R. 2010. Interplay between habitat fragmentation and climate change: inbreeding affects the response to thermal stress in Drosophila melanogaster. Climate Research 43: 57-70.
35. Klingenberg CP, Zaklan SD. 2000. Morphological integration between developmental compartments in the Drosophila wing. Evolution 54: 1273-1285.
36. Klingenberg CP, Barluenga M, Meyer A. 2002. Shape analysis of symmetric structures: quantifying variation among individuals and asymmetry. Evolution 56: 1909-1920.
37. Kristensen TN, Sørensen AC, Sorensen D, Pedersen KS, Sørensen JG, Loeschcke V. 2005. A test of quantitative genetic theory using Drosophila - effects of inbreeding and rate of inbreeding on heritabilities and variance components. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 18: 763-770.
38. Kristensen TN, Barker JSF, Pedersen KS, Loeschcke V. 2008. Extreme temperatures increase the deleterious consequences of inbreeding under laboratory and semi-natural conditions. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences 275: 2055-2061.
39. Lecuit T, Brook WJ, Ng M, Calleja M, Sun H, Cohen SM. 1996. Two distinct mechanisms for long-range patterning by Decapentaplegic in the Drosophila wing. Nature 381: 387-393.
40. Misra RK, Reeve ECR. 1964. Clines in body dimensions in populations of Drosophila subobscura. Genetics Research 5: 240-256.
41. Monteiro LR. 1999. Multivariate regression models and geometric morphometrics: the search for causal factors in the analysis of shape. Systematic Biology 48: 192-199.
42. Moreto B, Imasheva AG, Moren ZF, David JR. 1998. Wing shape and developmental temperature in two Drosophila species: different wing regions exhibit different reaction norms. Genetika 34: 248-258.
43. Mosimann JE. 1970. Size allometry: size and shape variables with characterization of the lognormal and generalized gamma distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association 65: 930-945.
44. Nellen D, Bruke R, Struhl G, Basler K. 1996. Direct and long-range action of a DPP morphogen gradient. Cell 85: 357-368.
45. O'Higgins P. 2000. Quantitative approaches to the study of craniofacial growth and evolution: advances in morphometric techniques. In: O'Higgins P, Cohn M, eds. Development, growth and evolution. Implications for the study of the hominid skeleton. London: Linnean Society of London, Academic Press, 163-185.
46. Palsson A, Gibson G. 2004. Association between nucleotide variation in Egfr and wing shape in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 167: 1187-1198.
47. Partridge L, Barrie B, Fowler K, French V. 1994. Evolution and development of body size and cell size in Drosophila melanogaster in response to temperature. Evolution 48: 1269-1276.
48. Partridge L, Langelan R, Fowler K, Zwaan B, French V. 1999. Correlated responses to selection on body size in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics Research Cambribge 79: 43-54.
49. Pedersen KS, Kristensen TN, Loeschcke V. 2005. Effects of inbreeding and rate of inbreeding in Drosophila melanogaster - Hsp70 expression and fitness. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 18: 756-762.
50. Penin X, Berge C, Baylac M. 2002. Ontogenetic study of the skull in modern humans and the common chimpanzees: neotenic hypothesis reconsidered with a tridimensional procrustes analysis. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 118: 50-62.
51. Pezzoli MC, Guerra D, Giorgi G, Garoia F, Cavicchi S. 1997. Developmental constraints and wing shape variation in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity 79: 572-577.
52. Prevosti A. 1955. Geographical variability in quantitative traits in populations of Drosophila subobscura. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 20: 294-298.
53. R Development Core Team. 2005. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at:
54. Reeve ECR, Robertson FW. 1952. Studies in quantitative inheritance. II. Analysis of a strain of Drosophila melanogaster selected for long wings. Journal of Genetics 51: 276-316.
55. Robertson FW. 1959. Studies in quantitative inheritance. XII. Cell size and number in relation to genetic and environmental variation to body size in Drosophila. Genetics 44: 869-895.
56. Robertson FW, Reeve ECR. 1952. Studies in quantitative inheritance. I. The effects of selection of wing and thorax length in Drosophila melanogaster. Journal of Genetics 50: 414-448.
57. Rohlf FJ, Marcus LF. 1990. A revolution in morphometrics. Trends in Ecology and Evoution 8: 129-132.
58. Rohlf FJ, Slice DE. 1990. Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Systematic Biology 39: 40-59.
59. Santos M, Iriarte PF, Céspedes W, Balanyà J, Fontdevila A, Serra L. 2004. Swift laboratory thermal evolution of wing shape (but not size) in Drosophila subobscura and its relationship with chromosomal inversion polymorphism. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 17: 841-855.
60. Santos M, Céspedes W, Balanyà J, Trotta V, Calboli FCF, Fontdevila A, Serra L. 2005. Temperature-related genetic changes in laboratory populations of Drosophila subobscura: evidence against simple climatic-based explanations for latitudinal clines. American Naturalist 165: 258-273.
61. Schmidt-Nielsen K. 1984. Scaling: why is animal size so important? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
62. Slice DE, Bookstein FL, Marcus LF, Rolf FJ. 1996. A glossary for geometric morphometrics. In: Marcus LF, Corti A, Loy A, Naylor GJP, Slice DE, eds. Advances in morphometrics, Vol. 284. New York, NY: Plenum Press, 531-551.
63. Stalker HD, Carson HL. 1947. Morphological variation in natural populations of Drosophila robusta Sturtevant. Evolution 1: 237-248.
64. Trotta V, Calboli FCF, Ziosi M, Guerra D, Pezzoli MC, David JR, Cavicchi S. 2006. Thermal plasticity in Drosophila melanogaster: a comparison of geographic populations. BMC Evolutionary Biology 6: 67.
65. Trotta V, Calboli FCF, Ziosi M, Cavicchi S. 2007. Fitness variation in response to artificial selection for reduced cell area, cell number and wing area in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. BMC Evolutionary Biology 7 (Suppl. 2): S10.
66. Vermeulen CJ, Bijlsma R. 2004. Characterization of conditionally expressed mutants affecting age-specific survival in inbred lines of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 167: 1241-1248.
67. Weber KE. 1990. Artificial selection on wing allometry in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 126: 975-989.
68. Weber KE. 1992. How small are the smallest selectable domains of form? Genetics 130: 345-353.
69. Weber K, Eisman R, Morey L, Patty A, Sparks J, Tausek M, Zeng ZB. 1999. An analysis of polygenes affecting wing shape on chromosome 3 in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 153: 773-786.
70. Weber K, Eisman R, Higgins S, Morey L, Patty A, Tausek M, Zeng ZB. 2001. An analysis of polygenes affecting wing shape on chromosome 2 in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 159: 1045-1057.
71. Wilkinson GS, Fowler K, Partridge L. 1990. Resistance of genetic correlation structure to directional selection in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 44: 1990-2003.
72. Wright LI, Tregenza T, Hosken DJ. 2008. Inbreeding, inbreeding depression and extinction. Conservation Genetics 9: 833-843.
73. Zimmerman E, Palsson A, Gibson G. 2000. Quantitative trait loci affecting components of wing shape in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 155: 671-683.