NATIONAL ATTITUDES REGARDING GENDER BIAS IN CHILD CUSTODY CASES

Family Court Review

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 208-223

  Dotterweich, Douglas ^a   McKinney, Michael ^a  

^a EAST TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79851497508     PISSN: 15312445     EISSN: 17441617     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.174-1617.2000.tb00570.x     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Economic report of the president. (1996). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
2. Missouri Task Force on Gender and Justice. Report of the Missouri Task Force on Gender and Justice. (1993, March). Jefferson City, Missouri.
3. Smoron, K. A. (1998). Conflicting roles in child custody mediation: Impartiality, neutrality and the best interests of the child. Family and Conciliation Courts Review, 36(2), 258–280.
4. Special Joint Committee on Gender Bias in the Courts. (May 1989). Gender bias in the courts. Annapolis, Maryland.
5. State Bar of Texas, Department of Research and Analysis. Gender Bias Task Force of Texas: Final Report. (February 1994). Austin, Texas.
6. Washington State Task Force on Gender and Justice in the Courts. Gender and justice in the courts: Appendixes. (1989). Olympia: Office of the Administrator for the Courts.
7. Wilker, N. J. (1989). Water on stone: A perspective on the movement to eliminate gender bias in the courts. State Court Journal, pp. 13–18.