Learning curves of harvester operators;Krivulje usavršavanja vozača harvestera

Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 89-97

  Purfürst, Frank Thomas ^a  

^a DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Harvester operations; Harvester operator; Harvester productivity; Human influence; Learning curves

Indexed keywords

HARVESTERS;

FORESTRY MACHINES; HARVESTER OPERATION; HARVESTER OPERATORS; HARVESTER PRODUCTIVITY; HIGH PRODUCTIVITY; HUMAN INFLUENCES; LEARNING CURVES; LONG TERM PRODUCTION; PERFORMANCE; PRODUCTION LOGGING;

PRODUCTIVITY;

FOREST INVENTORY; FORESTRY PRODUCTION; LEARNING; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS;

EID: 79851494068     PISSN: 18455719     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Björheden, R., 2000: Learning Curves in Tree Section hauling in Central Sweden. International Journal of Forest Engineering 12(1): 9-18.
2. Von Bodelschwingh, E., 2003: The new VALMET 801 combi first operational test results under central European conditions. In: Austro2003: High Tech Forest Operations for Mountainous Terrain, Austria, CDROM.
3. Von Bodelschwingh, E., Pausch, R., 2003: Der Valmet 801 Combi - erster Praxis Einsatz in Deutschland (VALMET 801 combi - first operational test results), AFZ-Der Wald 17: 858-860.
4. Calabrese, D., 2000: Canadian Switches to Mechanized, Cut-to-Length, TimberLine (Accessed: 11 April 2010).
5. Dinges, D., Kribbs, N., 1991: Sleep, Sleepiness, and Performance. In: Performing while sleepy: Effects of experimentally - inducet sleepiness., Wiley, Chichester; New York, Chapter 4, 97-128.
6. Dodd, K., McNeel, J., 1996: Factors Affecting Productivity of newly Established Thinning Operations. International Journal of Forest Engineering 7(2): 43-50.
7. Gabriel, O., 2005: Fahrer für Stendal (Harvester operator for Stendal). Forst & Technik 17(3): 26-27.
8. Garland, J., 1990: Assessing gains from woodsworker training, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 5: 227-242.
9. Gellerstedt, S., 2002: Operation of the Single-Grip Harvester: Motor-Sensory and Cognitive Work. International Journal of Forest Engeneering 13(2): 35-47.
10. Gellerstedt, S., Liden, E., Bohlin, F., 2005: Gesundheit und Leistung bei mechanisierter Waldarbeit. (Health and Performance in Mechanized Forest Operations), Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 45 p.
11. Harstela, P., 2004: The competence of the forest-machine operator and tacit knowledge. In: Simulator-based training of forest machine operators, Joensuu, Finland.
12. Heinimann, H. R., 1998: Produktivität und Einsatzbedingungen verschiedener Harvestertypen - eine statistische Auswertung aufgrund von Leistungsnachweisen (Productivity and operating conditions of various harvester types - a statistical analysis based on logging documents), Technical report, Department Wald und Holzforschung, Professur forstliches Ingenieurwesen, ETH Zürich.
13. Heinimann, R., 2001: Lernkurveneffekt eines Harvesterfahrers (Lerning curve effect of harvester operators). Unpublished Technical report, Department Wald und Holzforschung, Professur forstliches Ingenieurwesen, ETH Zürich.
14. Höllerl, H., 2005: Auf die Größe kommt es an - oder doch nicht? (The size is important - or not?). Forst & Technik 17(3): 16.
15. Jacke, H., 2000: Lernerfolg in der komplexen Steuerung von Forstmaschinen (Learning in the complex control of forestry machines). Forst & Technik 12(5): 4-7.
16. Jacke, H., Wagner, T., 2002: Einsichten aus einem virtuellen Wettbewerb - Teil 2 (Results from a virtual competition - part 2). Forst & Technik 14(2): 4-6.
17. Kärhä, K., Rönkkö, E., Bumse, S., 2004: Productivity and Cutting Costs of Thinning Harvesters. International Journal of Forest Engineering 15(2): 39-48.
18. Kirk, P., Byers, J., Parker, R., Sullman, M., 1997: Mechanisation Developments within the New Zealand Forest Industry: The Human Factors. International Journal of Forest Engineering 8(1): 75-80.
19. Löfgren, B., 2004: Simulator as a research tool. In: Simulator-based training of forest machine operators, Joensuu, Finland.
20. Loschek, J., Jirikowski, W., Pröll, W., Sperer, S., Tresniowski, S., 1998: Holz in der Durchforstung (Wood in thinning), Kooperationsabkommen Forst-Platte-Papier, Wien, 120 p.
21. Nicholls, A., Bren, L., Humphreys, N., 2004: Harvester Productivity and Operator Fatigue:Work Extended Hours. International Journal of Forest Engineering 15(2): 57-65.
22. Parker, R., Kirk, P., Sullman, M., 1996: Learning curves of mechanised harvester and forwarder operators. LIRO Report 21(29): 1-6.
23. Purfürst, F. T., 2009: Der Einfluss des Menschen auf die Leistung von Harvestersystemen (Human Influence on harvester productivity). PHD-Thesis, Technische Universität Dresden, Dr. Hut Verlag, Munich, 320 p.
24. Purfürst, F. T., Erler, J., 2006: The precision of productivity models for the harvester - do we forget the human factor. In: Precision Forestry in Plantations, Semi-Natural and Natural Forests, Proceedings of the International Precision Forestry Symposium, Stellenbosch University, South Africa, 465-475.
25. Purfürst, F. T., Erler, J., 2010: Human Influence on Productivity of Harvester Operations. Manuscript.
26. Ranta, P., 2004: The competence of the forest-machine operator and tacit knowledge. In: Simulator-based training of forest machine operators, Joensuu, Finland.
27. Skogforsk, 2008: Standard for Forest Data and communications - Main document. Technical report, Skogforsk, Sweden.
28. Stampfer, K., 1999: Lernkurveneffekte bei Forstmaschinenfühern (Learning curves of forest machinery operators). Arbeit imWald - Östereichische Forstzeitung 110(12): 1-2.
29. Stampfer, K., Gridling, H., Visser, R., 2002: Analyses of Parameters Affecting Helicopter Timber Extraction. International Journal of Forest Engeneering 13(2): 61-68.
30. Wagner, T., 2004: From the eighties up to the future - the development of forest machine simulators - A story of success? In: Simulator-based training of forest machine operators, Joensuu, Finland.