DNA barcoding reveals new insights into the diversity of Antarctic species of Orchomene sensu lato (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Lysianassoidea)

Deep-Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography

Volumn 58, Issue 1-2, 2011, Pages 230-241

  Havermans, C ^a,b   Nagy, Z T ^a   Sonet, G ^a   De Broyer, C ^a   Martin, P ^a  

^a ROYAL BELGIAN INSTITUTE OF NATURAL SCIENCES   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Amphipoda; DNA barcoding; Genetic diversity; Lysianassoidea; Southern Ocean; Species

Indexed keywords

AMPHIPODA; DNA BARCODING; GENETIC DIVERSITY; LYSIANASSOIDEA; SOUTHERN OCEAN; SPECIES;

BIODIVERSITY; DNA; DNA SEQUENCES; NUCLEIC ACIDS;

GENES;

AMPHIPOD; BENTHOS; DISPERSAL; ENZYME ACTIVITY; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; GENE FLOW; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; PHYLOGENY; SPECIES DIVERSITY; SPECIES RICHNESS; TAXONOMY;

SOUTHERN OCEAN;

ABYSSORCHOMENE; ACANTHURUS; AMPHIPODA; CRUSTACEA; LYSIANASSOIDEA; ORCHOMENE; ORCHOMENELLA;

EID: 79851483146     PISSN: 09670645     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2010.09.028     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Allcock A.L., Breirley A.S., Thorpe J.P., Rodhouse P.G. Restricted gene flow and evolutionary divergence between geographically separated populations of the Antarctic octopus Pareledone turqueti. Marine Biology 2004, 129:97-102.
2. Arnaud P.M., Jazdzewski K., Presler P., Siciński J. Preliminary survey of benthic invertebrates collected by Polish Antarctic Expeditions in the Admiralty Bay (King George Island, South Shetlands, Antarctica). Polish Polar Research 1986, 7:7-24.
3. Arntz W.E., Brey T., Gallardo V.A. Antarctic zoobenthos. Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review 1994, 32:241-304.
4. Arntz W.E., Thatje S., Gerdes D., Gili J.M., Gutt J., Jacob U., Montiel A., Orejas C., Teixidó N. The Antarctic-Magellan connection: macrobenthos ecology on the shelf and upper slope, a progress report. Scientia Marina 2005, 69:237-269.
5. Astrin J.J., Huber B.A., Misof B., Klütch C.F.C. Molecular taxonomy in pholcid spiders (Pholcidae, Araneae): evaluation of species identification methods using COI and 16S rRNA. Zoologica Scripta 2006, 35:441-457.
6. Barnard J.L., Karaman G. The families and genera of marine Gammaridean Amphipoda (except marine Gammaroids). Part 1. Records of the Australian Museum 1991, 13:1-866.
7. Barrett R.D.H., Hebert P.D.N. Identifying spiders through DNA barcodes. Canadian Journal of Zoology 2005, 83:481-491.
8. Beaumont A.R., Wei J.H.C. Morphological and genetic variation in the Antarctic limpet Nacella concinna (Strebel, 1908). Journal of Molluscan Studies 1991, 57:443-450.
9. Bernardi G., Goswami U. Molecular evidence for cryptic species among the Antarctic fish Trematomus bernachii and Trematomus hansoni. Antarctic Science 1997, 9:381-385.
10. Bickford D., Lohman D.J., Sohdi N.S., Ng P.K.L., Meier R., Winker K., Ingram K.K., Das I. Cryptic species as a window on diversity and conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 2007, 22:148-155.
11. Blaxter M.L. Molecular systematics: counting angels with DNA. Nature 2003, 421:122-124.
12. Blaxter M.L. The promise of DNA taxonomy. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences 2004, 359:669-679.
13. Bouchet P. The magnitude of marine biodiversity. The Exploration of Marine Biodiversity 2006, 33-64. Scientific and Tecnological challenges, Fundacíon BBVA. C.M. Duarte (Ed.).
14. Brandt A. On the origin and evolution of Antarctic Peracarida (Crustacea, Malacostraca). Scientia Marina 1999, 63:261-274.
15. Brandt A. Evolution of Antarctic biodiversity in the context of the past: the importance of the Southern Ocean deep sea. Antarctic Science 2005, 17:509-521.
16. Brandt A., Gooday A.J., Brandão S.N., Brix S., Brökeland W., Cedhagen T., Choudhury M., Cornelius N., Danis B., De Mesel I., Diaz R.J., Gillan D.C., Ebbe B., Howe J.A., Janussen D., Kaiser S., Linse K., Malyutina M., Pawlowski J., Raupach M., Vanreusel A. First insights into the biodiversity and biogeography of the Southern Ocean deep sea. Nature 2007, 447:307-311.
17. Brey T., Dahm C., Gorny M., Klages M., Stiller M., Arntz W.E. Do Antarctic invertebrates show an extended level of eurybathy?. Antarctic Science 1996, 8:3-6.
18. Brökeland W., Raupach M.J. A species complex within the isopod genus Haploniscus (Crustacea: Malacostraca: Peracarida) from the Southern Ocean deep sea: a morphological and molecular approach. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 2008, 152:655-706.
19. Buhay J.E. "COI-like" sequences are becoming problematic in molecular systematic and DNA barcoding studies. Journal of Crustacean Biology 2009, 29:96-110.
20. Clarke A., Crame J.A. Diversity, latitude and time: patterns in the shallow sea. Marine Biodiversity: Patterns and Processes 1997, 122-147. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. R.F. Ormond, J.D. Gage, M.V. Angel (Eds.).
21. Crame J.A. An evolutionary perspective on marine faunal connections between southernmost South America and Antarctica. Scientia Marina 1999, 63:1-14.
22. Cristescu M.E.A., Hebert P.D.N. The "Crustacean Seas"-an evolutionary perspective on the Ponto-Caspian peracarids. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 2005, 62:505-717.
23. De Broyer, C., 1983. Recherches sur la systématique et l'évolution des crustacés amphipodes gammarides antarctiques et subantarctiques. Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium, Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis.
24. De Broyer C., Rauschert M., Scailteur Y. Structural and ecofunctional biodiversity of the benthic amphipod taxocenoses. The expedition ANTARKTIS XV/3 (EASIZ II) of Polarstern in 1998 1999, vol. 301:163-174. Berichte zur Polarforschung.
25. De Broyer C., Scailteur Y., Chapelle G., Rauschert M. Diversity of epibenthic habitats of gammaridean amphipods in the eastern Weddell Sea. Polar Biology 2001, 24:744-753.
26. De Broyer, C., Nyssen, F., Rauschert, M., Lörz, A.-N., Cariceo, Y., Ríos, C., 2003. Biodiversity, biogeography, phylogeny and trophodynamics of amphipod and isopod crustaceans. In: Arntz, W.E., Brey, T. (Eds.), Report of the R/V Polarstern Cruise ANT XIX/3 Lampos in 2002. Berichte zur Polar- und Meeresforschung 462, pp. 34-44.
27. De Broyer C., Danis B., Heterier V. Biodiversity, phylogeny and trophodynamics of amphipod crustaceans in the Antarctic deep sea. The expedition ANTARKTIS XXII-3 of the Research Vessel Polarstern in 2005 2006, vol. 533:135-141. Berichte zur Polar- und Meeresforschung.
28. De Broyer C., Lowry J.K., Jazdzewski K., Robert H. Catalogue of the Gammaridean and Corophiidean Amphipoda (Crustacea) of the Southern Ocean with distribution and ecological data. Census of Antarctic Marine Life: Synopsis of the Amphipoda of the Southern Ocean 2007, vol. 77:1-325. Bulletin de l'Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, Biologie.
29. Folmer O., Black M., Hoeh R., Lutz R., Vrijenhoek R. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology 1994, 3:294-299.
30. Gentleman R., Carey V., Bates D., Bolstad B., Dettling M., Dudoit S., Ellis B., Gautier L., Ge Y., Gentry J., Hornik K., Hothorn T., Huber W., Iacus S., Irizarry R., Leisch F., Li C., Maechler M., Rossini A., Sawitzki G., Smith C., Smyth G., Tierney L., Yang J., Zhang J. Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics. Genome Biology 2004, 5:R80.
31. Grant R.A., Linse K. Barcoding Antarctic Biodiversity: current status and the CAML initiative, a case study of marine invertebrates. Polar Biology 2009, 32:1629-1637.
32. Gutt J., Fricke A., Teixidó N., Potthoff M., Arntz W.E. Mega-epibenthos at Bouvet Island (South Atlantic): a spatially isolated biodiversity hot spot on a tiny geological spot. Polar Biology 2006, 29:97-105.
33. Hajibabaei M., Janzen D.H., Burns J.M., Hallwachs W., Hebert P.D.N. DNA barcodes distinguish species of tropical Lepidoptera. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2006, 103:968-971.
34. Hajibabaei M., Singer G.A.C., Hebert P.D.N., Hickey D.A. DNA barcoding: how it complements taxonomy, molecular phylogenetics and population genetics. Trends in Genetics 2007, 23:167-172.
35. Havermans C., Nagy Z.T., Sonet G., De Broyer C., Martin P. Incongruence between molecular phylogeny and morphological classification in amphipod crustaceans: a case study of Antarctic lysianassoids. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 2010, 55:202-209.
36. Hebert P.D., Cywinska A., Ball S.L., deWaard J.R. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences 2003, 270:313-321.
37. Hebert P.D., Ratnasingham S., deWaard J.R. Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit I divergences among closely related species. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences 2003, 270(Suppl. 1):S96-S99.
38. Hebert P.D.N., Penton E.H., Burns J.M., Janzen D.H., Hallwachs W. Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgerator. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2004, 101:14812-14817.
39. Hebert P.D.N., Stoekcle M.Y., Zemlak T.S., Francis C.M. Identification of birds through DNA barcodes. PLoS Biology 2004, 2:1657-1663.
40. Held C. No evidence for slow-down of molecular substitution rates at subzero temperatures in Antarctic serolid isopods (Crustacea, Isopoda, Serolidae). Polar Biology 2001, 24:497-501.
41. Held C. Molecular evidence for cryptic speciation within the widespread Antarctic crustacean Ceratoserolis trilobitoides (Crustacea, Isopoda). Antarctic Biology in a Global Context 2003, 135-139. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands. A.H.L. Huiskes, W.W.C. Gieskes, J. Rozema, R.M.L. Schorno, S.M. van der Vies, W.J. Wolff (Eds.).
42. Held C., Wägele J.W. Cryptic speciation in the giant Antarctic isopod Glyptonotus antarcticus (Isopoda: Valvifera: Chaetiliidae). Scientia Marina 2005, 69:175-181.
43. Hou Z., Li Z., Li S. Identifying Chinese species of Gammarus (Crustacea: Amphipoda) using DNA barcoding. Current Zoology 2009, 55:158-164.
44. Janzen D.H., Hajibabaei M., Burns J.M., Hallwachs W., Remigio E., Hebert P.D.N. Wedding biodiversity inventory of a large and complex Lepidoptera fauna with DNA barcoding. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2005, 360:1835-1845.
45. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution 1980, 16:111-120.
46. Knowlton N. Sibling species in the sea. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1993, 24:189-216.
47. Knowlton N. Molecular genetic analyses of species boundaries in the sea. Hydrobiologia 2000, 420:73-90.
48. Lipscomb D., Platnick N., Wheeler Q. The intellectual content of taxonomy: a comment on DNA taxonomy. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 2003, 18:65-66.
49. Lörz A.-N., Brandt A. Phylogeny of Antarctic Epimeria (Epimeriidae: Amphipoda). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the UK 2004, 84:179-190.
50. Lörz A.-N., Held C. A preliminary molecular and morphological phylogeny of the Antarctic Epimeriidae and Iphimediidae (Crustacea, Amphipoda). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 2004, 31:4-15.
51. Lörz A.-N., Maas E.W., Linse K., Coleman C.O. Do circum-Antarctic species exist in peracarid Amphipoda? A case study in the genus Epimeria Costa, 1851 (Crustacea, Peracarida, Epimeriidae). Zookeys 2009, 18:91-128.
52. Mahon A.R., Arango C.P., Halanych K.M. Genetic diversity of Nymphon (Arthropoda: Pygcnogonida: Nymphonidae) along the Antarctic Peninsula with a focus on Nymphon australe Hodgson 1902. Marine Biology 2008, 155:315-323.
53. Meier R., Kwong S., Vaidya G., Ng P.K.L. DNA barcoding and taxonomy in Diptera: a tale of high intraspecific variability and low identification success. Systematic Biology 2006, 55:715-728.
54. Meier R., Zhang G., Ali F. The use of mean instead of smallest interspecific distances exagerates the size of the "barcoding gap" and leads to misidentification. Systematic Biology 2008, 57:809-813.
55. Meyer C.P., Paulay G. DNA barcoding: error rates based on comprehensive sampling. PLoS Biology 2005, 3:e422.
56. Moritz C., Cicero C. DNA barcoding: promise and pitfalls. PloS Biology 2004, 2:e354.
57. Nei M., Kumar S. Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetics 2000, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 331 pp.
58. Novotny V., Basset Y., Miller S.E., Weiblen G.D., Bremer B., Cizek L., Drozd P. Low host specificity of herbivorous insects in a tropical forest. Nature 2002, 416:841-844.
59. Page T.J., Linse K. More evidence of speciation and dispersal across the Antarctic Polar Front through molecular systematics of Southern Ocean Limatula (Bivalvia: Limidae). Polar Biology 2002, 25:818-826.
60. Paradis E., Claude J., Strimmer K. APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 2004, 20:289-290.
61. Quek S.P., Davies S.J., Itino T., Pierce N.E. Codiversification in an ant-plant mutualism: stem texture and the evolution of host use in Crematogaster (Formicidae: Myrmicinae) inhabitants of Macaranga (Euphorbiaceae). Evolution 2004, 58:554-570.
62. Raupach M.J., Wägele J.-W. Distinguishing cryptic species in Antarctic Asellota (Crustacea: Isopoda)-a preliminary study of mitochondrial DNA in Acanthaspidia drygalskii. Antarctic Science 2006, 18:191-198.
63. Raupach M.J., Malyutina M., Brandt A., Wägele J.-W. Molecular data reveal a highly diverse species flock within the munnopsoid deep-sea isopod Betamorpha fusiformis (Barnard, 1920) (Crustacea: Isopoda: Asellota) in the Southern Ocean. Deep-Sea Research II 2007, 54:1820-1830.
64. Saitou N., Nei M. The neighbour-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution 1987, 4:406-425.
65. Schander C., Willassen E. What can biological barcoding do for marine biology?. Marine Biology Research 2005, 1:79-83.
66. Schindel D.E., Miller S.E. DNA barcoding a useful tool for taxonomists. Nature 2005, 435:17.
67. Slattery P.N., Oliver J.S. Scavenging and other feeding habits of lysianassid amphipods (Orchomene spp.) from McMurdo Sound, Antarctica. Polar Biology 1986, 6:171-177.
68. Smith P.J., Steinke D., McVeagh S.M., Stewarts A.L., Struthers C.D., Roberts C.D. Molecular analysis of Southern Ocean skates (Bathyraja) reveals a new species of Antarctic skate. Journal of Fish Biology 2008, 73:1170-1182.
69. Strugnell J.M., Rogers A.D., Prodöhl P.A., Collins M.A., Allcock A.L. The thermohaline expressway: the Southern Ocean as a centre of origin for deep-sea octopuses. Cladistics 2008, 24:853-860.
70. Tamura K., Dudley J., Nei M., Kumar S. MEGA4: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution 2007, 24:1596-1599.
71. Thatje S., Hillenbrand C-D., Larter R. On the origin of the Antarctic marine benthic community structure. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 2005, 20.
72. Thomson M.R.A. Geological and paleoenvironmental history of the Scotia Sea region as a basis for biological interpretation. Deep-Sea Research II 2004, 51:1467-1487.
73. d'Udekem d'Acoz C., Robert H. Systematic and ecological diversity of amphipods. The expedition ANTARKTIS-XXIII/8 of the Research Vessel "Polarstern" in 2006/2007 2008, vol. 569:48-56. Berichte zur Polar- und Meeresforschung.
74. Vogler A.P., Monaghan M.T. Recent advances in DNA taxonomy. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 2007, 45:1-10.
75. Ward R.D., Zemlak T.S., Innes B.H., Last P.R., Hebert P.D.N. DNA barcoding Australia's fish species. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2005, 360:1847-1857.
76. Watling L.E., Thurston M.H. Antarctica as an evolutionary incubator: evidence from the cladistic biogeography of the amphipod family Iphimediidae. Origins and Evolution of the Antarctic Biota 1989, 297-313. The Geological Society, London. J.A. Crame (Ed.).
77. Waugh J. DNA barcoding in animal species: progress, potential and pitfalls. Phylogenetics and systematics. Bioessays 2007, 29:188-197.
78. Whitworth T.L., Dawson R.D., Magalon H., Baudry E. DNA barcoding cannot reliably identify species of the blowfly genus Protocalliphora (Diptera: Calliphoridae). Proceedings of the Royal Society, B, Biological Sciences 2007, 274:1731-1739.
79. Wiemers M., Fiedler K. Does the DNA barcoding gap exist?-A case study in blue butterflies (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Frontiers in Zoology 2007, 4:8.
80. Will K.W., Rubinoff D. Myth of the molecule: DNA barcodes for species cannot replace morphology for identification and classification. Cladistics 2004, 20:47-55.
81. Wilson N.G., Hunter R.L., Lockhart S.J., Halanych K.M. Multiple lineages and absence of panmixia in the "circumpolar" crinoid Promachocrinus kerguelensis from the Atlantic sector of Antarctica. Marine Biology 2007, 152:895-904.
82. Witt J.D.S., Blinn D.W., Hebert P.D.N. The recent evolutionary origin of the phenotypically novel amphipod Hyalella montezuma offers an ecological explanation for morphological stasis in a closely allied species complex. Molecular Ecology 2003, 12:405-413.
83. Witt J.D.S., Threloff D.L., Hebert P.D.N. DNA barcoding reveals extraordinary cryptic diversity in an amphipod genus: implications for desert spring conservation. Molecular Ecology 2006, 15:3073-3082.