Some methodological issues in biosurveillance

Statistics in Medicine

Volumn 30, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 403-415

  Fricker, Ronald D ^a  

^a NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Bioterrorism; Epidemiologic surveillance; Public health surveillance; Syndromic surveillance

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL WARFARE; BIOSTATISTICS; BIOSURVEILLANCE; CLASSIFICATION ALGORITHM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DISEASE SURVEILLANCE; EPIDEMIC; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM; PROBABILITY; PROCESS CONTROL; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RESEARCH PRIORITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARDIZATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL DISTRIBUTION; STOCHASTIC MODEL;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; BIOSTATISTICS; BIOSURVEILLANCE; BIOTERRORISM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EPIDEMIOLOGIC METHODS; GAME THEORY; HUMANS; INDUSTRY; MONTE CARLO METHOD; OPERATIONS RESEARCH; POPULATION SURVEILLANCE; PROBABILITY; QUALITY CONTROL; SYSTEMS THEORY;

EID: 79851469783     PISSN: 02776715     EISSN: 10970258     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sim.3880     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. U.S. Government, Homeland Security Presidential Directive 21: Public Health and Medical Preparedness, 2007. Accessed on-line at: on July 15, 2009.
2. Buehler JW, Sonricker A, Paladini M, Soper P, Mostashari F. Syndromic surveillance practice in the United States: findings from a survey of state, territorial, and selected local health departments. Advances in Disease Surveillance 2008; 6:(3):1-20.
3. Shmueli G, Burkom HS. Statistical Challenges Facing Early Outbreak Detection in Biosurveillance. Technometrics (Special Issue on Anomaly Detection). Accessed on-line at: on 27 September 2009.
4. Uscher-Pines L, Farrell CL, Babin SM, Cattani J, Gaydos CA, Hsieh Y, Moskal MD, Rothman RE. Framework for the development of response protocols for public health syndromic surveillance systems: case studies of 8 US states. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness 2009; 3:S29-S36.
5. Green M. Syndromic surveillance for detecting bioterrorist events-the right answer to the wrong question? Presentation given at the Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA, 9 June 2008.
6. Fricker Jr RD, Rolka HR. Protecting against biological terrorism: statistical issues in electronic biosurveillance. Chance 2006; 19:4-13.
7. Rolka HA. Data analysis research issues and emerging public health biosurveillance directions. In Statistical Methods in Counterterrorism: Game Theory, Modeling, Syndromic Surveillance, Wilson A, Wilson G, Olwell DH (eds). Springer: Berlin, 2006; 101-107.
8. Stoto MA, Schonlau M, Mariano LT. Syndromic surveillance: is it worth the effort? Chance 2004; 17:19-24.
9. Bravata DM, McDonald KM, Smithe WM, Rydzak C, Szeto H, Buckeridge DL, Haberland C, Owens DK. Systematic review: surveillance systems for early detection of bioterrorism-related diseases. Annals of Internal Medicine 2004; 140(11):910-922.
10. Reingold A. If syndromic surveillance is the answer, what is the question? Biosecurity and Bioterrorism: Biodefense Strategy, Practice, and Science 2003; 1:1-5.
11. Sosin DM. Syndromic surveillance: the case for skillful investment view. Biosecurity and Bioterrorism: Biodefense Strategy, Practice, and Science 2003; 1:247-253.
12. Cooper DL. Can syndromic surveillance data detect local outbreaks of communicable disease? A model using a historical Cryptosporidiosis outbreak. Epidemiology and Infection 2006; 134:13-20.
13. Smolinski MS, Hamburg MA, Lederberg J. Microbial Threats to Health: Emergence, Detection, and Response. National Academic Press: Washington, DC, 2003.
14. Stoto MA. Syndromic surveillance in public health practice. Presentation to Institute of Medicine Forum on Microbial Threats, Washington, DC, December 12, 2006.
15. Burkom H. Personal Communication. December 22, 2006.
16. Buckeridge DL, Owens DK, Switzer P, Frank J, Musen MA. Evaluating detection of an inhalational anthrax outbreak. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2006; 12(12):1942-1949.
17. wht3.com. Where's Osama? Accessed on-line at:. on September 28, 2009.
18. Fricker Jr RD, Chang JT. The repeated two-sample rank (RTR) procedure: a nonparametric multivariate individuals control chart, in draft. Available at: [10 July 2009].
19. Dembek ZF, Kortepeter MG, Pavlin JA. Discernment between deliberate and natural infectious disease outbreaks. Epidemiology and Infection 2007; 135:353-371.
20. Fraker SE, Woodall WH, Mousavi S. Performance metrics for surveillance schemes. Quality Engineering 2008; 20:451-464.
21. Woodall WH. Use of control charts in health-care and public-health surveillance (with Discussion). Journal of Quality Technology 2006; 38:89-104.
22. Rolka H, Burkom H, Cooper GF, Kulldorff M, Madigan D, Wong W. Issues in applied statistics for public health bioterrorism surveillance using multiple data streams: research needs. Statistics in Medicine 2007; 26:1834-1856.
23. Rolka H, Bracy D, Russell C, Fram D, Ball R. Using simulation to assess the sensitivity and specificity of a signal detection tool for multidimensional public health surveillance data. Statistics in Medicine 2005; 24:551-562.
24. Fricker Jr RD, Hegler BL, Dunfee DA. Comparing biosurveillance detection methods: EARS' versus a CUSUM-based methodology. Statistics in Medicine 2008; 27:3407-3429.
25. Fricker Jr RD, Knitt MC, Hu CX. Directionally sensitive MCUSUM and MEWMA procedures with application to biosurveillance. Quality Engineering 2008; 20:478-494.
26. Woodall WH, Grigg OA, Burkom HS. Research issues and ideas on health-related monitoring. In Frontiers in Statistical Quality Control 9, Lenz JJ, Wilrich P-Th (eds). Springer: Berlin, 2006; 101-107.
27. Fricker Jr RD. Directionally sensitive multivariate statistical process control methods with application to syndromic surveillance. Advances in Disease Surveillance 2007; 3. Available on-line at.
28. Groenewold MR. Comparison of two signal detection methods in a coroner-based system for near real-time mortality surveillance. Public Health Reports 2008; 122:521-530.
29. Stoto MA, Fricker Jr RD, Jain A, Diamond A, Davies-Cole JO, Glymph C, Kidane G, Lum G, Jones L, Dehan K, Yuan C. Evaluating statistical methods for syndromic surveillance. In Statistical Methods in Counterterrorism: Game Theory, Modeling, Syndromic Surveillance, and Biometric Authentication, Wilson A, Wilson G, Olwell DH (eds). Springer: Berlin, 2006; 141-172.
30. Hutwagner LC, Thompson WW, Seeman GM, Treadwell T. A simulation model for assessing aberration detection methods used in public health surveillance systems with limited baselines. Statistics in Medicine 2005; 24:543-550.
31. Hutwagner LC, Browne T, Seeman GM, Fleischauer AT. Comparing aberration detection methods with simulated data. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2005; 11:314-316.
32. Rogerson PA, Yamada I. Monitoring change in spatial patterns of disease: comparing univariate and multivariate cumulative sum approaches. Statistics in Medicine 2004; 23:2195-2214.
33. Siegrist D, Pavlin J. Bio-ALIRT biosurveillance detection algorithm evaluation. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 2004; 53(supplement):152-158.
34. Shmueli G. Accessed on-line at:. on October 8, 2008.
35. Fricker Jr RD, Banschbach D. Optimizing biosurveillance systems that use threshold based event detection methods. Information Fusion 2010; in press. Available online at.