Integrating toxicity testing in the wastewater management of chemical storage terminals - A proposal based on a ten-year study

Journal of Hazardous Materials

Volumn 186, Issue 2-3, 2011, Pages 1909-1915

  Rodrigues, Eleni Stark ^a,b   Umbuzeiro, Gisela de Aragão ^b,c  

^a Secretaria do Estado do Meio Ambiente   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Biodegradability; Chemical terminal effluent; Reuse; Toxicity; Vibrio fischeri

Indexed keywords

ACUTE TOXICITY TEST; AQUATIC ENVIRONMENTS; BEFORE AND AFTER; BIODEGRADABLE ORGANIC MATTER; CHEMICAL STORAGE; CHEMICAL TERMINALS; ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS; FINAL EFFLUENTS; LIQUID CHEMICALS; POLLUTION CONTROL AND PREVENTION; PRE-TREATMENT; RAIN WATER; REUSE; STORAGE TERMINALS; TOXIC SUBSTANCES; TOXICITY TEST; TOXICITY TESTING; TREATED EFFLUENT; VIBRIO FISCHERI; WASTE-WATER CONTROL; WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT;

BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; BIODEGRADATION; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CHEMICALS; DECISION MAKING; EFFLUENTS; INTEGRATION; OIL TERMINALS; OXYGEN; POLLUTION CONTROL; QUALITY CONTROL; WASTEWATER; WASTEWATER RECLAMATION; WATER CONSERVATION;

TOXICITY;

INDUSTRIAL EFFLUENT; INORGANIC COMPOUND; ORGANIC COMPOUND; RAIN;

BACTERIUM; BIODEGRADATION; BIOINDICATOR; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; DECISION MAKING; PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROPERTY; POLLUTION CONTROL; RAINWATER; RECYCLING; TOXICITY; WASTE MANAGEMENT; WASTEWATER;

AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT; ARTICLE; BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; BIODEGRADABILITY; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; DEGRADATION; ECOTOXICITY; EFFLUENT; EFFLUENT TOXICITY; MASS SPECTROMETRY; STORAGE; TOXICITY TESTING; VIBRIO FISCHERI; WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT; WASTE WATER RECYCLING; WATER POLLUTION CONTROL;

BIODEGRADATION, ENVIRONMENTAL; BIOLOGICAL ASSAY; BIOLOGICAL OXYGEN DEMAND ANALYSIS; BRAZIL; CHEMICAL INDUSTRY; INDUSTRIAL WASTE; OXYGEN; RECYCLING; TOXICITY TESTS; VIBRIO FISCHERI; WASTE DISPOSAL, FLUID; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

VIBRIO FISCHERI;

EID: 79751536957     PISSN: 03043894     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.12.083     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. São Paulo Decree No. 8468/76. Law of São Paulo State 1976, State Official Press, São Paulo, September 9th.
2. Brazil CONAMA Resolution 357 of 17/03/2005. Federal Legislation 2005, Union Official Press, Brasília, March 18th.
3. EC, Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control Directive (IPPC), Directive 2008/1/EC of the European parliament and of the council, January, 15th. , 2008 (accessed on September, 4th, 2010). http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do%3Furi=OJ%3AL%3A2008%3A024%3A0008%3A0029%3AEN%3APDF.
4. Metcalf L., Eddy H.P. Wastewaster Engeneering Treatment in Reuse 2003, Mcgraw Hill, Boston, p. 1819. 4.ed.
5. UNECE. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. Environmental Hazard. Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS). ANNEX 9. , 2009 (accessed on September 4th, 2010). http://www.unece.org/trans/danger/publi/ghs/ghs_rev03/English/13e_annex9.pdf.
6. Sapia P.M.A.S., Morita D.M. Criteria for receipt of non-domestic wastewater into public sewer systems: a critical analysis. Eng. Sanit. Amb. 2003, 8(3):145-156.
7. Mendonça E., Picado A., Paixão S.M., Silva L., Cunha M.A., Leitão S., Moura I., Cortez C., Brito F. Ecotoxicity tests in the environmental analysis of wastewater treatment plants: case study in Portugal. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 163:665-670.
8. USEPA.United States Environmental Protection Agency Technical Support Document for Water Quality-Based Toxics Control, EPA/505/2-90-001 1991, Office of Water, Washington, DC.
9. EC Water Framework Directive (WFD). Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council 2000.
10. ECETOC, Whole Effluent Assessment, Technical Report no. 94, European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals, Brussels, Belgium, 2004.
11. EC, Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council 2006.
12. CCME. Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment. Developing Biocriteria as a Water Quality Assessment Tool in Canada. , 2006. http://www.ccme.ca/assets/pdf/biocriteria_report_e_web_1.0.pdf.
13. ANZECC, ARMCANZ Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council and Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand. Australian and New Zealand guidelines for fresh and marine water quality 2000, Canberra, Australian.
14. Power E.A., Boumphrey R.S. International trends in bioassay use for effluent management. Ecotoxicology 2004, 13:377-398.
15. CETESB. Environmental Company of São Paulo. Control Manual Ecotoxicological Wastewater, São Paulo, Brazil, 2009.
16. CODESP. Dock Company of São Paulo. Santos Port Authority. 2008 Annual Report. , 2009. http://www.portodesantos.com.br/relatorio/Relatorio2008.pdf.
17. APHA-AWWA-WEF. American Public Health Association; American Water Works Association; Water Environment Federation. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 21th ed., Washington, DC, 2005.
18. ISO Water quality - Determination of ammonium nitrogen - Method by flow analysis (CFA and FIA) and spectrometric detection 2005, ISO 11732, International Standard Organization.
19. USEPA. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Test methods, SW-846, USEPA Office, Washington, DC, 2006. http://www.epa.gov/epaoswer/hazwaste/test/main.htm%23table.
20. ISO Water quality - Determination of the inhibitory effect of water samples on the light emission of Vibrio fischeri (Luminescent bacteria test) - Part 3: Method using freeze-dried bacteria 2007, ISO 11348-3, International Standard Organization.
21. Costa Neto de Oliveira P.L. Statistics 2002, Edgard Blücher, São Paulo.
22. Dalzell D.J.B., Alte S., Aspichueta E., de La Sota A., Etxebarria J., Gutierrez M., Hoffmann C.C., Sales D., Obst U., Christofi N. A comparison of five rapid direct toxicity assessment methods to determine toxicity of pollutants to activated sludge. Chemosphere 2002, 47(5):535-545.
23. Knie J.L.W., Lopes E.W.B. Ecotoxicological Tests: Methods, Techniques and Applications 2004, FATMA/GTZ, Florianópolis.
24. Guerra R. Ecotoxicological and chemical evaluation of phennolic compouds in industrial effluents. Chemosphere 2001, 44:1737-1747.
25. Nieto R. Ecotoxicological characterization of industrial wastewater. Rev. Sanean. Amb. 2001, 74:30-40.
26. ® to assess toxicity removal of industrial effluents from the industrial district of Camaçari (BA, Brazil). Chemosphere 2005, 58:1277-1281.
27. Zambon R.C., Morita D.M., Souza P.A. Mathematical model for removal of volatile organic compounds in diffuse air drag units. Eng. Sanit. Amb. 2003, 8:59-68.
28. USEPA. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Effluent Guidelines Transportation Equipment Cleaning, Office of Water, Washington, DC, 2009.
29. USEPA. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Water Recycling and Reuse: The Environmental Benefits. EPA 909-F-98-001, Region IX, San Francisco, CA, 1998.
30. USEPA. United States Environmental Protection Agency Guidelines for Water Reuse. EPA/625/R-04/108, Office of Water, Washington, DC 2004.
31. Jennings V.L.K., Rayner-Brandes M.H., Bird.F D.J. Assessing chemical toxicity with the bioluminescent Photobacterium (Vibrio fischeri): a comparison of three commercial systems. Water Res. 2001, 35:3448-3456.
32. Chapman P.M. Whole effluent toxicity testing-usefulness, level of protection, and risk assessment. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2000, 19:3-13.
33. Chapman P.M. Determining when contamination is pollution-weight of evidence determinations for sediments and effluents. Environ. Int. 2007, 33:492-501.
34. Daniel M., Sharpe A., Driver J., Knight A.W., Keenan P.O., Walmsley R.M., Robinson A., Zhang T., Rawson D. Results of a technology demonstration project to compare rapid aquatic toxicity screening tests in the analysis of industrial effluents. J. Environ. Monit. 2004, 6:855-865.
35. Ronco A., Rossini G.B., Sobrero C., Apartin C., Castillo G., Díaz-Baez M.C., Ramírez A.E., Ahumada I., Mendoza J. The application of hazard assessment schemes using the watertox toxicity testing battery. Small-scale Freshwater Toxicity Investigations 2005, Vol. 2:233-256. Springer Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
36. CETESB. Environmental Company of São Paulo. Technical Report: Review of the Applicability of V. fischeri Test in Field Analysis, Using a Portable Luminometer, São Paulo, Brazil (2009) 25 p.