Effects of syngas type on the operation and performance of a gas turbine in integrated gasification combined cycle

Energy Conversion and Management

Volumn 52, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 2262-2271

  Kim, Young Sik ^a   Lee, Jong Jun ^a   Kim, Tong Seop ^a   Sohn, Jeong L ^b  

^a Inha University   (South Korea)

^b Center for Next Generation Heat Exchangers   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Compressor surge; Gas turbine; Integrated gasification combined cycle; Integration degree; Syngas type; Turbine metal temperature

Indexed keywords

COMPRESSOR SURGES; CONTROL RANGE; FIRING TEMPERATURE; FUEL HEATING; HEATING VALUE; INTEGRATED GASIFICATION COMBINED CYCLE; INTEGRATION APPROACH; MASS FLOW; METAL TEMPERATURE; NET SYSTEMS; NITROGEN FLOW; OFF-DESIGN ANALYSIS; OPTIMAL INTEGRATION; POWER OUT PUT; RESTRICTED OPERATIONS; SURGE MARGIN; SYN-GAS; TURBINE OPERATION; TWO PARAMETER;

GAS COMPRESSORS; GAS TURBINES; GASIFICATION; HEATING; INTEGRATION; METALS; SYNTHESIS GAS; THERMOELECTRIC POWER; TURBOMACHINE BLADES;

COMPRESSIBILITY OF GASES;

EID: 79751527397     PISSN: 01968904     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2011.01.009     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. J.P. Longwell, E.S. Rubint, and J. Wilson Coal: energy for the future Energy Combust 22 1995 269 360
2. Dennis RA, Shelton WW, Le P. Development of baseline performance values for turbines in existing IGCC applications. ASME paper GT2007-28096; 2007.
3. Farmer R, editor. Status of active IGCC plant projects, vol. 39, No. 1. Gas Turbine World; 2009. p. 26-34.
4. Parkinson G. OEMs getting ready for coal gasification, vol. 45. Turbomachinery International; 2004. p. 6-8.
5. Farmer R. GE reference plant targeting COE parity with SPCP plants, vol. 37, No. 1. Gas Turbine World; 2007. p. 37-41.
6. Farmer R, editor. Mitsubishi 250 MW demo plant on target for mid-2007 testing, vol. 37, No. 1. Gas Turbine World; 2007. p. 41-5.
7. Farmer R, editor. Siemens reference plant rated 630 MW net 38% HHV efficiency, vol. 37, No. 1. Gas Turbine World; 2007. p. 46-50.
8. 2-capture for hard coal and lignite Energy Convers Manage 51 2010 2179 2187
9. Brdar RD, Jones RM. GE IGCC technology and experience with advanced gas turbines. GE Power Systems, GER-4207; 2000.
10. Bradley T, Fadok J. Advanced hydrogen turbine development update. ASME paper GT2009-59105; 2009.
11. 2 capture study in advanced integrated gasification combined cycle Appl Therm Eng 27 2007 2693 2702 (Pubitemid 47268808)
12. 2 removal Energy 33 2008 874 881 (Pubitemid 351609251)
13. Dennis RA, Harp R. Overview of the US department of energy's office of fossil energy advanced turbine program for coal based power systems with carbon capture. ASME paper GT2007-28338; 2007.
14. Julianne MK. Fossil energy power plant desk reference. DOE/NETL-2007;1282.
15. C. Costas, H. Ioannis, and P. Andreas Assessment of integrated gasification combined cycle technology competitiveness Renew Sustain Energy Rev 12 2008 2452 2464
16. J.J. Lee, Y.S. Kim, K.S. Cha, T.S. Kim, J.L. Sohn, and Y.J. Joo Influence of system integration options on the performance of an integrated gasification combined cycle power plant Appl Energy 86 2009 1788 1796
17. M. Rieger, R. Pardemann, H. Rauchfuβ, and B. Meyer Effects of ASU integration on IGCC performance and gas turbine operation VGB Power Technol 88 2008 102 107
18. Oluyede EO, Phillips JN. Fundamental impact of firing syngas in gas turbines. ASME paper 2007-27385; 2007.
19. Y.S. Kim, J.J. Lee, K.S. Cha, T.S. Kim, J.L. Sohn, and Y.J. Joo Performance analysis of a syngas-fed gas turbine considering the operating limitations of its components Appl Energy 87 2010 1602 1611
20. Z. Ligang, and F. Edward Comparison of shell, texaco, BGL and KRW gasifiers as part of IGCC plant computer simulations Energy Convers Manage 46 2005 1767 1779
21. S. Osamu, Y. Akira, and K. Yoshinori The development of advanced energy technologies in Japan IGCC: a key technology for the 21st century Energy Convers Manage 43 2002 1221 1233
22. 2 from coal with commercially ready technology, part A: performance and emissions Int J Hydrogen Energy 30 2007 747 767 (Pubitemid 40430610)
23. GE Power-Enter Software. GateCycle ver 6.0; 2006.
24. Hoffmann J, Tennant J, Stiegel GJ. Comparison of Pratt and Whitney Rocketdyne IGCC and commercial IGCC performance. DOE/NETL-401/062006.
25. Farmer R, editor. Gas turbine world, handbook. Pequot Publishing Inc.; 2009.
26. Brooks FJ. GE gas turbine performance characteristics. General Electric Report GER-3567H.
27. Palmer CA, Erbes MR. Simulation methods used to analyze the performance of the GE PG6541B gas turbines utilizing low heating value fuels. ASME IGTI Cogen-Turbo'94, vol. 9; 1994. p. 337-46.
28. Kim TS, Ro ST. Comparative evaluation of the effect of turbine configuration on the performance of heavy-duty gas turbines. ASME paper 95-GT-334; 1995.
29. Consonni S, Lozza G, Macchi E. Turbomachinery and off-design aspects in steam-injected gas cycles. In: 23rd Intersociety energy conversion engineering conference, vol. 4; 1983. p. 99-108.
30. Boyce MP. Gas turbine engineering handbook, 2nd ed. Houston: Gulf Professional Publishing; 2002. p. 414-25.