Learning expressive percussion performance under different visual feedback conditions

Psychological Research

Volumn 75, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 107-121

  Brandmeyer, Alex ^a   Timmers, Renee ^b   Sadakata, Makiko ^a   Desain, Peter ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MUSIC; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SENSORY FEEDBACK;

FEEDBACK, SENSORY; HUMANS; LEARNING; MUSIC; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79751526037     PISSN: 03400727     EISSN: 14302772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-010-0291-6     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Annett, J. (1969). Feedback and human behavior. Penguin Education.
2. Cemgil, A. T., Desain, P., & Kappen, B. (2000). Rhythm quantization for transcription. Computer Music Journal, 24(2), 60-76.
3. Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8(4), 293-332.
4. Cheung, K.-W., Yeung, D.-Y., & Chin, R. (1998). A bayesian framework for deformable pattern recognition with application to handwriten character recognition. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 20(12), 1382-1388.
5. Clark, E. F. (1987). Categorical rhythm perception: an ecological perspective. In A. Gabrielsson (Ed.), Action and perception in rhythm and music. Royal Swedish Academy of Music.
6. Clark, E. F. (1993). Imitating and evaluating real and transformed musical performances. Music Perception, 10(3), 317-341.
7. Corbetta, M., Miezin, F. M., Dobmeyer, S., Shulman, G. L., & Petersen, S. E. (1991). Selective and divided attention during visual discriminations of shape, color, and speed: functional anatomy by positron emission tomography. Journal of Neuroscience, 11(8), 2383-2402.
8. Craik, F. I. M., Govoni, R., Naveh-Benjamin, M., & Anderson, N. D. (1996). The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 125(2), 159-180.
9. Dahl, S. (2000). The playing of an accent-preliminary observations from temporal and kinematic analysis of percussionists. Journal of New Music Research, 29(3), 225-233.
10. Desain, P., & Honing, H. (2003). The formation of rhythmic categories and metric priming. Perception, 32(3), 341-365.
11. Engle, R. W. (2002). Working memory capacity as executive attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(1), 19-23.
12. Escartí, A., & Guzmán, J. F. (1999). Effects of feedback on self-efficacy, performance and choice in an athletic task. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 11(1), 83-96.
13. Evans, J. (1960). An investigation of teaching machine variables using learning programs in symbolic logic. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.
14. Hoffren, J. (1964). A test of musical expression. Council for Research in Music Education, 2, 32-35.
15. Hoppe, D., Sadakata, M., & Desain, P. (2006). Development of real-time visual feedback assistance in singing training: a review. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 308-316.
16. Juslin, P., Friberg, A., Schoonderwaldt, E., & Karlsson, J. (2004). Feedback learning of musical expressivity. In A. Williamon (Ed.), Musical excellence. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
17. Kent, R. D. (1974). Auditory-motor formant tracking: a study of speech imitation. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 17, 203-222.
18. Knill, D. C., Kerstern, D., & Yuille, A. (1996). Introduction: a Bayesian formulation of visual perception. In D. C. Knill & W. Richards (Eds.), Perception as Bayesian inference (pp. 1-21). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. McPherson, G. E., & Schubert, E. (2004). Measuring performance enhancement in music. In A. Williamon (Ed.), Musical excellence. Oxford University Press.
20. Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 1-4.
21. Palmer, C. (1997). Music performance. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 115-138.
22. Pennington, M. C. (1999). Computer-aided pronunciation pedagogy: promise, limitations, directions. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 12(5), 427-440.
23. Person, R. S. (1993). The subjectivity of musical performance: an exploratory music-psychological real world enquiry into the determinants and education of musical reality. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK.
24. Repp, B. H. (2000). Pattern typicality and dimensional interactions in pianists' imitation of expressive timing and dynamics. Music Perception, 18(2), 173-211.
25. Repp, B. H., & Williams, D. R. (1985). Categorical trends in vowel imitation: preliminary observations from a replication experiment. Speech Communication, 4, 105-120.
26. Repp, B. H., & Williams, D. R. (1987). Categorical tendencies in imitating self-produced isolated vowels. Speech Communication, 6, 1-14.
27. Rosch, E. (2002). Principles of categorization. In Levitin, D. J. (Ed.), Cognitive psychology. MIT Press.
28. Rossiter, D., Howard, D. M., & DeCosta, M. (1996). Voice development under training with and without the influence of real-time visually presented feedback. Journal Acoustical Society of America, 99(5), 3253-3256.
29. Sadakata, M., Hoppe, D., Brandmeyer, A., Timmers, R., & Desain, P. (2008). Real-time visual feedback for learning to perform short rhythms with expressive variations in timing and loudness. Journal of New Music Research, 37(3), 207-220.
30. Semjen, A., & Garcia-Colera, A. (1986). Planning and timing of finger tapping sequences with a stressed element. Journal of Motor Behavior, 18, 287-322.
31. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257-285.
32. Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4(4), 295-312.
33. Tait, M. (1992). Teaching strategies and styles. In R. Cowell (Ed.), Handbook of research on music teaching and learning (p. 525-534). New York: Schirmer.
34. Temperley, D. (2007). Music and probability. MIT Press.
35. Thorpe, C. W., Callaghan, J., & van Doorn, J. (1999). Visual feedback of acoustic voice features: New tools for the teaching of singing. Australian Voice, 1(5), 32-39.
36. Walker, R. (1987). The effects of culture, environment, age, and musical training on choices of visual metaphors for sound. Percetpion and Psychophysics, 42, 491-502.
37. Welch, G. F. (1985). A schema theory of how children learn to sing in tune. Psychology of Music, 13, 3-18.
38. Welch, G. F., Himonides, E., Howard, D. M., & Brereton, J. (2004). Voxed: Technology as a meaningful teaching aid in the singing studio. In Proceedings of the conference on interdisciplinary musicology (cim04).
39. Welch, G. F., Howard, D. M., & Rush, C. (1989). Real-time visual feedback in the development of vocal pitch accuracy in singing. Psychology of Music, 17, 146-157.
40. Wickens, T. D. (2002). Elementary signal detection theory. Oxford University Press.
41. Wilson, P. H., Lee, Callaghan, J., & Thorpe, C. W. (2008). Learning to sing in tune: does real-time visual feedback help? Journal of Interdisciplinary Music Studies, 2(1-2), 157-172.