How the social-evaluative context modulates processes of cognitive control

Psychological Research

Volumn 75, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 143-151

  Dreisbach, Gesine ^a   Böttcher, Svenja ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF REGENSBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; REACTION TIME; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT;

EID: 79751523140     PISSN: 03400727     EISSN: 14302772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-010-0298-z     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Ashby, F. G., Isen, A. M., & Turken, U. (1999). A neuropsychological theory of positive affect and its influence on cognition. Psychological Review, 106(3), 529-550.
2. Baron, R. S. (1986). Distraction/conflict theory: Progress and problems. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 1-40.
3. Blanton, H., & Stapel, D. A. (2008). Unconscious and spontaneous and ... complex: The three selves model of social comparison assimilation and contrast. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 1018-1032.
4. Callejas, A., Lupiàñez, J., Funes, M. J., & Tudela, P. (2005). Modulations among the alerting, orienting and executive control networks. Experimental Brain Research, 167, 27-37.
5. Dreisbach, G. (2006). How positive affect modulates cognitive control: The costs and benefits of reduced maintenance capability. Brain and Cognition, 60, 11-19.
6. Dreisbach, G., & Goschke, T. (2004). How positive affect modulates cognitive control: Reduced perseveration at the cost of increased distractibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 343-353.
7. Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception and Psychophysics, 16, 143-149.
8. Fan, J., McCandliss, B. D., Sommer, T., Raz, A., & Posner, M. I. (2002). Testing the efficiency and independence of attentional networks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 340-347.
9. Finkel, E. J., Campbell, W. K., Brunell, A. B., Dalton, A. N., Scarbeck, S. J., & Chartrand, T. L. (2006). High-maintenance interaction: Inefficient social coordination impairs self-regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 456-475.
10. Gable, P., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2010). The blues broadens, but the nasty narrows: Attentional consequences of negative affects low and high in motivational intensity. Psychological Science, 21, 211-215.
11. Hommel, B., Colzato, L. S., & van den Wildenberg, W. P. M. (2009). How social are task representations? Psychological Science, 20, 794-798.
12. Huguet, P., Gavaing, M. P., Monteil, J. M., & Dumas, F. (1999). Social presence effects in the Stroop task: Further evidence for an attentional view of social facilitation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1011-1025.
13. Karremans, J. C., Verwijmeren, T., Pronk, T. M., & Reitsma, M. (2009). Interacting with women can impair men's executive functioning. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1041-1044.
14. Klauer, K. C., Herfordt, J., & Voss, A. (2008). Social presence effects on the Stroop task: Boundary conditions and an alternative account. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 469-476.
15. Knoblich, G., & Sebanz, N. (2006). The social nature of perception and action. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 99-104.
16. Koch, S., Holland, R. W., Hengstler, M., & Knippenberg, A. (2009). Body Locomotion as Regulatory Process: Stepping Backward Enhances Cognitive Control. Psychological Science, 20, 549-550.
17. Koch, S., Holland, R. W., & Knippenberg, A. (2008). Regulating cognitive control through approach-avoidance motor actions. Cognition, 109, 132-144.
18. Lavie, N. (2005). Distracted and confused? Selective attention under load. Trends in Cognitive Science, 9, 75-82.
19. Lavie, N., Hirst, A., de Fockert, J. W., & Viding, E. (2004). Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 339-354.
20. Most, S. B., Laurenceau, J.-P., Graber, E., Belcher, A., & Smith, C. V. (2010). Blind jealousy? Romantic insecurity increases emotion-induced failures of visual perception. Emotion, 10, 250-256.
21. Muraven, M., & Baumeister, R. F. (2000). Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: Does self-control resemble a muscle? Psychological Bulletin, 126, 247-259.
22. Mussweiler, T., Rüter, K., & Epstude, K. (2004). The man who wasn't there. Subliminal social standards influence self-evaluation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 689-696.
23. Oaksford, M., Morris, F., Grainger, B., & Williams, J. M. G. (1996). Mood, reasoning, and central executive processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 477-493.
24. Olivers, C. N. L., & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2006). The beneficial effects of additional task load, positive affect, and instruction on the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 364-379.
25. Phillips, L. H., Bull, R., Adams, E., & Fraser, L. (2002). Positive mood and executive functions: Evidence from Stroop and fluency tasks. Emotion, 2, 12-22.
26. Richeson, J. A., & Shelton, J. N. (2003). When prejudice does not pay: Effects of interracial contact on executive function. Psychological Science, 14, 287-290.
27. Richeson, J. A., & Trawalter, S. (2005). Why do interracial interactions impair executive function? A resource depletion account. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 934-947.
28. Roepstorff, A., & Frith, C. (2004). What's at the top in the top-down control of action? Psychological Research, 68, 189-198.
29. Rowe, G., Hirsh, J. B., & Anderson, A. K. (2007). Positive affect increases the breadth of attentional selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(1), 383-388.
30. Scherer, K. R. (2001). Appraisal considered as a process of multi-level sequential checking. In K. R. Scherer, A. Schorr, & T. Johnstone (Eds.), Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research (pp. 92-120). New York: Oxford University Press.
31. Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., & Prinz, W. (2003). Representing others' actions: Just like one's own? Cognition, 88, B11-B21.
32. Vogt, J., De Houwer, J., Koster, E. H. W., van Damme, S., & Crombez, G. (2008). Allocation of spatial attention to emotional stimuli depends upon arousal and not valence. Emotion, 8, 880-885.
33. Wühr, P., & Huestegge, L. (2010). The impact of social presence on voluntary and involuntary control of spatial attention. Social Cognition, 28, 145-160.
34. Zajonc, R. B. (1965). Social facilitation. Science, 149, 269-274.