Real-time Market Research

Marketing Intelligence & Planning

Volumn 11, Issue 7, 1993, Pages 29-38

  Sanchez, Ron ^a   Sudharshan, D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79751500219     PISSN: 02634503     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/02634509310051551     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Association of National Advertisers (1984), Prescription for New Product Success, New York
2. Buzzell, R.D. and Gale, B.T. (1987), The PMS Principles, Free Press, New York
3. Clark, K. and Fujimoto, T. (1991), Product Development Performance, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA
4. Cooper, R.G. and Kleinschmidt, E.J. (1986), “An Investigation into New Product Processi Steps, Deficiencies, and Impact”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 1986, Vol. 3, pp.71-85
5. Cusumano, M. (1989), “Toshiba: Linking Productivity and Re-Usability”, working paper, MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, MA. The Economist (1991), 12 January, p. 61
6. Green, P.E. and Krieger, A.M. (1989), “Recent Contributions of Optimal Product Positioning and Buyer Segmentation”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 41, pp. 127-41
7. Gruca, T., Kumar, R. and Sudharshan, D. (1988), “Product Positioning Strategies for Segment Pre-emption”, Proceeding of the 1988 AMA Educators’ Conference, American Marketing Association, Chicago, IL, pp. 47-52
8. Kalynaraman, G. and Urban, G.L. (1990), “Dynamic Effects of the Order of Entry on Market Share, Trial Penetration, and Repeat Purchase for Frequently Purchased Consumer Goods”, working paper, MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, MA
9. Mahajan, V. and Wind, J. (1991), “New Product Models: Practice, Shortcomings, and Desired Improvements”, Report Number 91-125, Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MA, October
10. Ratneshwar, S., Shocker, A.D. and Stewart, D.W. (1986), “Understanding the Attraction Effect: The Implications of Product Stimulus, Meaningfulness, and Familiarity”, working paper 85-13, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN
11. Robinson, W.T. (1988), “Sources of Pioneer Advantages: A Replication Applied to Industrial Goods Industries”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 25, pp. 87-94
12. Sanchez, R.A. (1991), “Strategic Flexibility, Reap Options, and Product-based Strategy”, MIT doctoral dissertation, Cambridge, MA
13. Sanderson, S. and Uzumeri, V. (1990), “Strategies for New Product Development and Renewal: Design-Based Incrementalism”, Rensalear Polytechnic Institute, working paper, Center for Science and Technology, Rensalear, NY
14. Shirley, G. (1990), “Models for Managing the Redesign and Manufacture of Product Sets”, Journal of Manufacturing Operations Management, Vol. 3, pp. 85-104
15. Sudharshan, D., May, J.H., and Gruca, T. (1988), “DIFFSTRAT: An Analytical Procedure Strategy”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 36, pp. 50-65
16. Ulrich, K. and Tung, K. (1991), “Fundamentals of Product Modularity”, working paper, MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, MA
17. Urban, G.L., Carter, T., Gaskin, S. and Mucha, Z. (1986), “Market Share Rewards to Pioneering Brands: An Empirical Analysis and Strategic Implications”, Management Science, Vol. 32, pp. 645-59
18. Wittink, D.R. and Cattin, P. (1989), “Commercial Use of Conjoint Analysis: An Update”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 53, pp. 91-96
19. Womack, J., Jones, T. and Roos, T. (1991), The Machine that Changed the World, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA