Assessing risk of bias in randomized controlled trials

Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 296-297

  Purgato, Marianna ^a   Corrado, Barbui ^a   Cipriani, Andrea ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VERONA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Bias; Outcome reporting; Quality; Randomised controlled trial

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EPIDEMIOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); RISK ASSESSMENT; STATISTICS;

BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 79751492825     PISSN: 1121189X     EISSN: 20381816     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1705/539.6423     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Cipriani A. & Geddes J.R. (2009). What is a randomised controlled trial? Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale 18, 191-194.
2. Cipriani A., Purgato M. & Barbui C. (2009). Why internal and external validity of experimental studies are relevant for clinical practice? Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale 18, 101-103.
3. Jüni P., Altman D.G. & Egger M. (2001). Systematic reviews in health care: assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. British Medical Journal 323, 42-46. (Pubitemid 32682008)
4. Moher D., Jadad A.R., Nichol G., Penman M., Tugwell P. & Walsh S. (1995). Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists. Controlled Clinical Trials 16, 62-73.
5. Schulz K.F., Altman D.G., Moher D. & CONSORT Group (2010). CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. British Medical Journal 340, c332.