Genetic variation amongst and within the native provenances of pinus radiata d. don in south-eastern australia. 3. molecular and quantitative structure

Silvae Genetica

Volumn 59, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 289-298

  Raymond, C A ^a   Tibbits, J F G ^b   Henson, M ^c,d  

^a SOUTHERN CROSS UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c State Forests of New South Wales   (Australia)

^d EucalyptusBiz   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Californian collection; F st; Pinus radiata; Provenances; Qst; Structure

Indexed keywords

CALIFORNIAN COLLECTION; F ST; PINUS RADIATA; PROVENANCES; QST; STRUCTURE;

BAYESIAN NETWORKS; FORESTRY; GENES; STATISTICAL TESTS;

POPULATION STATISTICS;

AUSTRALIA; BIOLOGICAL POPULATIONS; FORESTRY; GENES; PINUS RADIATA; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STRUCTURES;

PINUS RADIATA; RADIATA;

EID: 79751470517     PISSN: 00375349     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. ADES, P. K. and J. A. SIMPSON (1991): Variation in susceptibility to Dothistroma needle blight among provenances of Pinus radiata var. radiata. Silvae Genetica 40: 6-13.
2. BURDON, R. D. (1992): Genetic survey of Pinus radiata. 9: General discussion and implications for genetic management. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science 22: 274-298.
3. BURDON, R. D. and C. B. Low (1992): Genetic survey of Pinus radiata. 6: wood properties: variation, heritabilities, and interrelationships with other traits. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science 22: 228-245.
4. BURDON, R. D., M. H. BANNISTER, H. A. I. MADGWICK and C. B. Low (1992): Genetic survey of Pinus radiata. 1: introduction, description of experiment, and basic methodology. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science 22: 119-137.
5. BURDON, R. D., R. E. GASKIN, J. A. ZABKIEWICZ and C. B. Low (1992): Genetic survey of Pinus radiata. 7: variation and inheritance of pinene composition in wood oleoresin. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science 22: 246-256.
6. BURDON, R. D., A. FIRTH, C. B. Low and M. A. MILLER (1997): Native provenances of Pinus radiata in New Zealand: performance and potential. New Zealand Forestry 41: 32-36.
7. BURDON, R. D., A. FIRTH, C. B. LOW and M. A. MILLER (1998): Multi-site provenance trials of Pinus radiata in New Zealand. Forest Genetic Resources 26: 3-8.
8. BUTCHER, T. B. and M. J. C. STUKELY (1997): Variation in natural populations of Pinus radiata in resistance to Phytopthora cinnamomi. IUFRO '97 Genetics of Radiata Pine, Rotorua, New Zealand, New Zealand Forest Research institute.
9. ELDRIDGE, K. G. (1978): Refreshing the genetic resources of radiata pine plantations. CSIRO Division of Forest Research, Genetics Section Report, No. 7, 120 pp.
10. GARNIER-GÉRÉ, P-H., A. C. MATHESON and P. K. ADES (1997): Assessment of the genetic potential for adaptation of natural provenances: case study of Pinus radiata. IUFRO'97 Genetics of radiata pine, Rotorua, New Zealand, FRI Bulletin.
11. GILMOUR, A. R., B. J. GOGEL, B. R. CULLIS, S. J. WELHAM and R. THOMPSON (2002): ASReml user guide release 1. VSN, Hemel Hempstead, UK.
12. JOHNSON, I. G., P. K. ADES and K. G. ELDRIDGE (1997): Growth of natural Californian provenances of Pinus radiata in New South Wales, Australia. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science 27: 23-38.
13. KARHU, A., C. VOGL, G. F. MORAN, J. C. BELL and O. SAVOLAINEN (2006): Analysis of microsatellite variation in Pinus radiata reveals effects of genetic drift but no recent bottlenecks. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 19: 167-175.
14. KINLOCH, B. B. and W. J. LIBBY (1997): Variation in susceptibility to Western gall rust in Pinus radiata and P. muricata. IUFRO '97 Genetics of Radiata Pine, Rotorua, New Zealand, New Zealand Forest Research institute.
15. LATTA, R. G. (2003): Gene flow, adaptive population divergence and comparative population structure across loci. New Phytologist 161: 51-58.
16. LIBBY, W. J. (1997): Native origins of domesticated radiata pine. In: BURDON, R. D. and MOORE, J. M. IUFRO '97 Genetics of Radiata Pine. FRI Bulletin No. 203. Rotorua New Zealand, pp. 9-25.
17. MCKAY, J. K. and R. G. LATTA (2002): Adaptive population divergence: markers, QTL and traits. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17: 285-291.
18. MERILÁ, J. and P. CRNOKRAK (2001): Comparison of genetic differentiation at marker loci and quantitative traits. Journal Evolutionary Biology 14: 892-903.
19. MILLAR, C. I. (1986): The Californian closed cone pines (Subsection Oocarpae Little and Critchfield) - a taxonomie history and review. Taxon 35: 657-670.
20. MILLAR, C. I. (1997): Quaternary evolution of Pinus radiata. IUFRO '97 Genetics of Radiata Pine, Rotorua New Zealand, New Zealand Forest Research Institute.
21. st under neutrality. Genetics 180: 1023-1037.
22. MORAN, G. F., J. C. BELL and K G. ELDRIDGE (1988): The genetic structure and the conservation of the five natural populations of Pinus radiata. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 18: 506-514.
23. MORAN, G. F. and J. C. BELL (1987): The origin and genetic diversity of Pinus radiata in Australia. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 43: 616-622.
24. PRITCHARD, J. K., M. STEPHENS and P. DONNELLY (2000): Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945-959.
25. PRITCHARD, J., D. FALUSH and M. STEPHENS (2002): Inference of population structure in recently admixed populations. American Journal of Human Genetics 71: 177-177.
26. RAYMOND, C. A. and M. HENSON (2009): Genetic variation within the native provenances of Pinus radiata D. Don. 1. Growth and form to age 26 years. Silvae Genetica 58: 242-252.
27. RAYMOND, C. A., M. HENSON and B. JOE (2009): Genetic variation within the native provenances of Pinus radiata D. Don. 2. Wood density and stiffness at age 26 years. Silvae Genetica, 58: 192-204.
28. ROGERS, D. L. (2002): In situ Genetic Conservation of Monterey pine (Pinus radiata D. Don): Information and Recommendations. University of California, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Genetic Conservation Program Report No. 26. Davis, California, USA.
29. ROSENBERG, N. A. (2005): Algorithms for selecting informative marker panels for population assignment. Journal of Computational Biology 12: 1183-1201.
30. ROSENBERG, N. A., T. BURKE, K. ELO, M. W FELDMANN, P. J. FREIDLIN, M. A. M. GROENEN, J. HILLEL, A. MAKI-TANILA, M. TIXIER-BOICHARD, A. VIGNAL, K. WIMMERS and S. WEIGEND (2001): Empirical evaluation of genetic clustering methods using multilocus genotypes from 20 chicken breeds. Genetics 159: 699-713.
31. ROSENBERG, N. A., L. Li, R. WARD and J. K. PRITCHARD (2003): Informativeness of genetic markers for inference of ancestry. American Journal of Human Genetics 73: 1402-1422.
32. ROSENBERG, N. A., S. MAHAJAN, S. RAMACHANDRAN, C. F. ZHAO, J. K. PRITCHARD and M. W. FELDMAN (2005): Clines, clusters, and the effect of study design on the inference of human population structure. Plos Genetics 1: 660-671.
33. STEANE, D. A., N. CONOD, R. C. JONES, R. E. VAILLANCOURT, B. M. POTTS (2006): A comparative analysis of population structure of a forest tree, Eucalyptus globulus (Myrtaceae), using microsatellite markers and quantitative traits. Tree Genetics & Genomes 2: 30-38.
34. VOGL, C., A. KARHU, G. MORAN and O. SAVOLAINEN (2002): High resolution analysis of mating systems: inbreeding in natural populations of Pinus radiata. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 15: 433-439.