Graphic syntax and representational development

Drawing and the Non-Verbal Mind: A Life-Span Perspective

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 139-158

  Vinter, Annie ^a   Picard, Delphine ^b   Fernandes, Viviane ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE BOURGOGNE   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PAUL VALÉRY   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79651470510     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511489730.008     Document Type: Chapter

References (56)

1. Akshoomoff, N. A. and Stiles, J. (1995a). Developmental trends in visuospatial analysis and planning: I. Copying a complex figure. Neuropsychology, 9, 364– 77
2. Akshoomoff, N. A. and Stiles, J. (1995b). Developmental trends in visuospatial analysis and planning: 2. Memory for a complex figure. Neuropsychology, 9, 378–89
3. Barlow, C. M., Jolley, R. P., White, D. G. and Galbraith, D. (2003). Rigidity in children’s drawings and its relation with representational change. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 86, 124–52
4. Barrett, M., Beaumont, A. and Jennett, M. (1985). Some children do sometimes what they have been told to do: task demands and verbal instructions on children’s drawings. In N. H. Freeman and M. V. Cox (eds.), Visual order: the nature and development of pictorial representation (pp. 176–87). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
5. Berti, A. E. and Freeman, N. H. (1997). Representational change in resources for pictorial innovations: a three-component analysis. Cognitive Development, 12, 501–22
6. Bozeat, S., Lambon Ralph, M. A., Graham, K. S., Patterson, K., Wilkin, H., Rowland, J., Rogers, T. T. and Hodges, J. R. (2003). A duck with four legs: investigating the structure of conceptual knowledge using picture drawing in semantic dementia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 27–47
7. Bremner, G. and Moore, S. (1984). Prior visual inspection and object naming: two factors that enhance hidden-feature inclusion in young children’s drawings. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 2, 371–6
8. Carey, S. and Diamond, R. (1977). From piecemeal to configurational representation of faces. Science, 195, 312–14
9. Cox, M. V. (1992). Children’s drawings. Harmonds worth: Penguin
10. Davies, A. M. (1983). Contextual sensitivity in young children’s drawings. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 35, 478–86
11. Dukette, D. and Stiles, J. (1996). Children’s analysis of hierarchical patterns: evidence from a similarity judgment task. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 63, 103–40
12. Goodnow, J. and Levine, R. A. (1973). The grammar of action: sequence and syntax in children’s copying behaviour. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 82–98
13. Ingram, N. (1985). Three into two won’t go: symbolic and spatial coding processes in young children’s drawings. In N. H. Freeman and M. V. Cox (eds.), Visual order: the nature and development of pictorial representation (pp. 231–47). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
14. Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1990). Constraints on representational change: evidence from children’s drawing. Cognition, 34, 57–83
15. Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992). Beyond modularity: a developmental perspective on cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
16. Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1999). Taking development seriously. Human Development, 42, 325–7
17. Kemler Nelson, D. G. (1984). The effect of intention on what concepts are acquired. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 23, 734–59
18. Kemler Nelson, D. G. (1989). The nature and occurrence of holistic processing. In B. E. Shepp and S. Ballesteros (eds.), Object perception (pp. 357–86). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
19. Lange-Küttner, C. (1997). Development of size modification of human figure drawings in spatial axes systems of varying complexity. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 66, 264–78
20. Lange-Küttner, C. (2000). The role of object violations in the development of visual analysis. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 90, 3–24
21. Lange-Küttner, C. (2004). More evidence on size modification in spatial axes systems of varying complexity. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 88, 171–92
22. Lewis, C., Russell, C. and Berridge, D. (1993). When is a mug not a mug? Effects of content, naming, and instructions on children’s drawings. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 56, 291–302
23. Marot, V. and Vinter, A. (2003). Rôle de la complexité et de l’orientation d’une figure géométrique sur l’application des régles de production graphique chez l’enfant et l’adulte [The role of complexity and orientation of a geometric figure for the application of graphic production rules in the child and adult]. Archives de Psychologie, 70, 175–92
24. Marteniuk, R. G., McKenzie, C. L., Jeannerod, M., Athenes, S. and Dugas, C. (1987). Constraints on human armmovement trajectories. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 41, 365–78
25. Mounoud, P. (1988). The ontogenesis of different types of thought: language and motor behaviours as non-specific manifestations. In L.Weiskrantz (ed.), Thought without language (pp. 25–45). Oxford: Clarendon Press
26. Mounoud, P. (1996). A recursive transformation of central cognitive mechanisms: the shift from partial to whole representation. In P. Sameroff and M. Haith (eds.), Reason and responsibility: the passage through childhood (pp. 85–110). Chicago: University of Chicago Press
27. Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: the precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353–83
28. Nicholls, A. and Kennedy, J. M. (1992). Drawing development: from similarity of features to direction. Child Development, 63, 227–41
29. Nihei, Y. (1983). Developmental changes in covert principles for the organization of strokes in drawing and handwriting. Acta Psychologica, 54, 846–9
30. Ninio, A. and Lieblich, A. (1976). The grammar of action: phrase structure in children’s copying. Child Development, 47, 846–9
31. Perruchet, P. and Vinter, A. (2002). The self-organizing consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25, 297–330
32. Piaget, J. and Inhelder, B. (1956). The child’s conception of space. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul
33. Picard, D. and Durand, K. (2005). Are young children’s drawings canonically biased? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 90, 48–64
34. Picard, D. and Vinter, A. (1999). Representational flexibility in children’s drawing: effects of age and verbal instructions. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 17, 605–22
35. Picard, D. and Vinter, A. (2005). Development of graphic formulas for the depiction of familiar objects. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29, 418–32
36. Picard, D. and Vinter, A. (2006). Decomposing and connecting object representations in 5- to 9-yearold children’s drawing behaviour. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 17, 529–45
37. Picard, D. and Vinter, A. (2007). Relationship between procedural rigidity and inter-representational change in children’s drawing behaviour. Child Development, 74, 521–41
38. Phillips, W. A., Inall, M. and Lauder, E. (1985). On the discovery, storage and use of graphic descriptions. In N. H. Freeman and M. V. Cox (eds.), Visual order: the nature and development of pictorial representation (pp. 122–34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
39. Schyns, P. G. and Rodet, L. (1997). Categorization creates functional features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 681– 96
40. Simner, M. L. (1981). The grammar of action and children’s printing. Developmental Psychology, 20, 136–42
41. Spensley, F. and Taylor, J. (1999). The development of cognitive flexibility: evidence from children’s drawings. Human Development, 42, 300–24
42. Stiles, J. (1995). The early use and development of graphic formulas: two case study reports of graphic formula production by 2- to 3-year-old children. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 18, 127–49
43. Sutton, P. J. and Rose, D. H. (1998). The role of strategic visual attention in children’s drawing development. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 68, 87–107
44. Tada, W. L. and Stiles, J. (1996). Developmental change in children’s analysis of spatial patterns. Developmental Psychology, 3, 951–70
45. Van Sommers, P. (1984). Drawing and cognition: descriptive and experimental studies of graphic production processes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
46. Vinter, A. (1990). Manual imitations and reaching behaviors: an illustration of action control in infancy. In C. Bard, M. Fleury and L. Hay (eds.), Development of eye–hand coordination across the life span (pp. 157–87). Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press
47. Vinter, A. (1994). Hierarchy among graphic production rules: a developmental approach. In C. Faure, P. Keuss, G. Lorette and A. Vinter (eds.), Advances in handwriting and drawing: a multidisciplinary approach (pp. 275–88). Paris: Europia
48. Vinter, A. (1999). How meaning modifies drawing behaviour in children. Child Development, 70, 33–49
49. Vinter, A. and Detable, C. (2003). Implicit learning in children and adolescents with mental retardation. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 108, 94– 107
50. Vinter, A. and Marot, V. (2007). The development of context sensitivity in children’s graphic copying strategies. Developmental Psychology, 43, 94– 110
51. Vinter, A. and Meulenbroek, R. (1993). The role of manual dominance and visual feedback in circular drawing movements. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 25, 11–37
52. Vinter, A. and Perruchet, P. (1999). Isolating unconscious influences: the neutral parameter procedure. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52, 857– 75
53. Vinter, A. and Perruchet, P. (2000). Implicit learning in children is not related to age: evidence from drawing behaviour. Child Development, 71, 1223–40
54. Vinter, A. and Perruchet, P. (2002). Implicit motor learning through observational training in adults and children. Memory and Cognition, 30, 256–61
55. Vinter, A. and Picard, D. (1996). Drawing behaviour in children reflects internal representational changes. In M. Simner, G. Leedham and A. Thomassen (eds.), Handwriting and drawing research (pp. 171–85). Amsterdam: IOS Press
56. Zhi, Z., Thomas, G. V. and Robinson, E. J. (1997). Constraints on representational changes: drawing a man with two heads. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 15, 275–90