Duration of treatment and occlusal outcome using Damon3 self-ligated and conventional orthodontic bracket systems in extraction patients: A prospective randomized clinical trial

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 139, Issue 2, 2011, Pages

  Dibiase, Andrew T ^a   Nasr, Inas H ^b   Scott, Paul ^c   Cobourne, Martyn T ^b  

^a EAST KENT HOSPITALS UNIVERSITY NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^b KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c LEEDS DENTAL INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; AMBULATORY CARE; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EQUIPMENT; FEMALE; HOSPITAL MANAGEMENT; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MANDIBLE; METHODOLOGY; MULTICENTER STUDY; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; ORTHODONTICS; PEER REVIEW; PREMOLAR TOOTH; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TIME; TOOTH EXTRACTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADOLESCENT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; APPOINTMENTS AND SCHEDULES; BICUSPID; EQUIPMENT FAILURE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MANDIBLE; OFFICE VISITS; ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS; ORTHODONTICS, CORRECTIVE; PEER REVIEW, HEALTH CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS; TOOTH EXTRACTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 79551716586     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.07.020     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. K.W. Loh Rapid tooth movement with a low-force, low-friction bracket system J Clin Orthod 41 2007 451 457
2. D. Damon Damon system: the workbook 2004 Crown Orange County, CA
3. J.J. Eberting, S.R. Straja, and O.C. Tuncay Treatment time, outcome, and patient satisfaction comparisons of Damon and conventional brackets Clin Orthod Res 4 2001 228 234 (Pubitemid 33351682)
4. N.W. Harradine Self-ligating brackets and treatment efficiency Clin Orthod Res 4 2001 220 227 (Pubitemid 33351681)
5. D. Tagawa From good to great: the Damon system versus conventional appliances: a comparative study Clin Impressions 15 2006 4 9
6. N. Pandis, A. Polychronopoulou, and T. Eliades Self-ligating vs conventional brackets in the treatment of mandibular crowding: a prospective clinical trial of treatment duration and dental effects Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 132 2007 208 215
7. N. Pandis, A. Polychronopoulou, M. Makou, and T. Eliades Mandibular dental arch changes associated with treatment of crowding using self-ligating and conventional brackets Eur J Orthod 32 2009 248 253
8. A.M. Pringle, A. Petrie, S.J. Cunningham, and M. McKnight Prospective randomized clinical trial to compare pain levels associated with 2 orthodontic fixed bracket systems Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 136 2009 160 167
9. P. Scott, A.T. DiBiase, M. Sherriff, and M.T. Cobourne Alignment efficiency of Damon3 self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems: a randomized clinical trial Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 134 2008 470 e1-8
10. P. Scott, M. Sherriff, A.T. Dibiase, and M.T. Cobourne Perception of discomfort during initial orthodontic tooth alignment using a self-ligating or conventional bracket system: a randomized clinical trial Eur J Orthod 30 2008 227 232
11. P.G. Miles, R.J. Weyant, and L. Rustveld A clinical trial of Damon 2 vs conventional twin brackets during initial alignment Angle Orthod 76 2006 480 485 (Pubitemid 43692581)
12. N. Pandis, A. Polychronopoulou, and T. Eliades Active or passive self-ligating brackets? A randomized controlled trial of comparative efficiency in resolving maxillary anterior crowding in adolescents Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 137 2010 12.e1-6; discussion 12-3
13. S.S. Chen, G.M. Greenlee, J.E. Kim, C.L. Smith, and G.J. Huang Systematic review of self-ligating brackets Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 137 2010 726 e1-8
14. P.S. Fleming, and A. Johal Self-ligating brackets in orthodontics. A systematic review Angle Orthod 80 2010 575 584
15. F.R. Beckwith, R.J. Ackerman Jr., C.M. Cobb, and D.E. Tira An evaluation of factors affecting duration of orthodontic treatment Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 115 1999 439 447
16. M.A. Fisher, R.M. Wenger, and M.G. Hans Pretreatment characteristics associated with orthodontic treatment duration Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 137 2010 178 186
17. K.J. Skidmore, K.J. Brook, W.M. Thomson, and W.J. Harding Factors influencing treatment time in orthodontic patients Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 129 2006 230 238 (Pubitemid 43220299)
18. S. Richmond, W.C. Shaw, K.D. O'Brien, I.B. Buchanan, R. Jones, and C.D. Stephens The development of the PAR index (peer assessment rating): reliability and validity Eur J Orthod 14 1992 125 139
19. S. Richmond, W.C. Shaw, C.T. Roberts, and M. Andrews The PAR index (peer assessment rating): methods to determine outcome of orthodontic treatment in terms of improvement and standards Eur J Orthod 14 1992 180 187
20. R.M. Little, R.A. Riedel, and J. rtun An evaluation of changes in mandibular anterior alignment from 10 to 20 years postretention Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 93 1988 423 428
21. R.M. Little, T.R. Wallen, and R.A. Riedel Stability and relapse of mandibular anterior alignment-first premolar extraction cases treated by traditional edgewise orthodontics Am J Orthod 80 1981 349 365 (Pubitemid 12244378)
22. J.R. Mills The long-term results of the proclination of lower incisors Br Dent J 120 1966 355 363
23. P.S. Fleming, A.T. DiBiase, G. Sarri, and R.T. Lee Efficiency of mandibular arch alignment with 2 preadjusted edgewise appliances Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 135 2009 597 602
24. P.S. Fleming, A.T. DiBiase, and R.T. Lee Randomized clinical trial of orthodontic treatment efficiency with self-ligating and conventional fixed orthodontic appliances Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 137 2010 738 742
25. S. Ehsani, M.A. Mandich, T.H. El-Bialy, and C. Flores-Mir Frictional resistance in self-ligating orthodontic brackets and conventionally ligated brackets. A systematic review Angle Orthod 79 2009 592 601
26. S. Budd, J. Daskalogiannakis, and B.D. Tompson A study of the frictional characteristics of four commercially available self-ligating bracket systems Eur J Orthod 30 2008 645 653
27. M. Krishnan, S. Kalathil, and K.M. Abraham Comparative evaluation of frictional forces in active and passive self-ligating brackets with various archwire alloys Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 136 2009 675 682
28. K.F. Schulz, D.G. Altman, and D. Moher CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials BMJ 340 2010 c332