Review section symposium: The choice for europe: Social purpose and state power from messina to maastricht

Journal of European Public Policy

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 155-179

  Wallace, Helen ^a   Caporaso, James A ^b   Schampf, Fritz W ^c   Moravcsik, Andrew ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^c MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF SOCIETIES   (Germany)

^d HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79551703409     PISSN: 13501763     EISSN: 14664429     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/135017699343856     Document Type: Note

References (13)

1. Andrew Moravcsik, The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1998), pp. 77–85
2. Gary King, Robert O. Keohane and Sidney Verba, Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994), pp. 26–7.
3. Judith Goldstein and Robert Keohane (eds), Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1993).
4. Kathleen R. McNamara, The Currency of Ideas: Monetary Politics in the European Union (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1997)
5. Paul Krugman, Peddling Prosperity: Economic Sense and Nonsense in the Age of Diminished Expectations (New York: Norton, 1994)
6. Alberto Giovannini, ‘Economic and monetary union: what happened? Exploring the political dimension of optimum currency areas’, in Centre for Economic Policy Research, The Monetary Future of Europe (London: CEPR, 1993)
7. Peter A. Hall (ed.), The Political Power of Economic Ideas: Keynesianism across Nations (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1989).
8. James Alt, Jeffry Frieden, Michael Gilligan, Dani Rodrik and Ronald Rogowski, ‘The political economy of international trade: enduring puzzles and an agenda for inquiry,’ Comparative Political Studies 29(6) (December 1996): 689–717.
9. Karl-Orfeo Fioretos, ‘The anatomy of autonomy: interdependence, domestic balances of power, and European integration’, Review of International Studies 23(3) (July 1997): 293–320.
10. Daniel Wincott, ‘Institutional interaction and European integration: towards an everyday critique of liberal intergovernmentalism’, Journal of Common Market Studies 33(4) (December 1995): 597–609
11. Andrew Moravcsik, ‘Liberal intergovernmentalism and integration: a rejoinder’, Journal of Common Market Studies 33(4) (December 1995): 611–28
12. Paul Pierson, ‘The path to European Union: an historical institutionalist account’, Comparative Political Studies 29(2) (April 1996): 123–64.
13. Andrew Moravcsik, ‘Europe’s integration at century’s end’, in Moravcsik (ed.), Centralization or Fragmentation? Europe Facing the Challenges of Deepening Diversity, and Democracy (New York: Council on Foreign Relations Press, 1998), pp. 1–58.